Literature DB >> 32196720

The impact of oro-facial appearance on oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review.

Pernilla Larsson1,2,3,4, Lars Bondemark5, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson1,3.   

Abstract

Esthetics in the oro-facial region are important for perceived oral health and a common reason for treatment of discoloured, missing or crowded teeth. As one of the fundamental bricks of a patient's oral health, changes in the domain of oro-facial esthetics resides within the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of an individual. Four main dimensions, oral function, oro-facial pain, oro-facial appearance and psychosocial impact, are suggested to cover the concept of OHRQoL. The aim of this systematic review was to map the impact from oral conditions with principal impact on the oro-facial appearance dimension of OHRQoL (PROSPERO: CRD42017064033). Publications were included if they reported Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) mean or median domain scores for patients with esthetic treatment need relating to tooth wear, orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, frontal tooth loss or tooth whitening. A search in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO 8 June 2017 and updated 14 January 2019, identified 2,104 abstracts. After screening of abstracts, 1607 articles were reviewed in full text and 33 articles included. These 33 articles reported OHIP-data for 9409 patients grouped in 63 patient populations. Median oro-facial appearance impact scores on a standardised 0-8 scale, for populations with treatment need relating to tooth wear, orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, frontal tooth loss and tooth whitening, ranged from 0.13 for tooth wear to 3.04 for tooth whitening populations. In conclusion, a moderate impact for the oro-facial appearance dimension of OHRQoL was found in patients with different conditions with esthetically related treatment need.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental esthetics; oral health; patient-reported outcomes; physical appearance; quality of life

Year:  2020        PMID: 32196720     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  12 in total

1.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE AND SCORING OF ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE VERSIONS.

Authors:  M T John; M Omara; N Su; T List; S Sekulic; B Häggman-Henrikson; C M Visscher; K Bekes; D R Reissmann; K Baba; O Schierz; N Theis-Mahon; K Fueki; T Stamm; L Bondemark; I Oghli; A van Wijk; P Larsson
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.267

Review 2.  Oral frailty indicators to target major adverse health-related outcomes in older age: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vittorio Dibello; Frank Lobbezoo; Madia Lozupone; Rodolfo Sardone; Andrea Ballini; Giuseppe Berardino; Anita Mollica; Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Giovanni De Pergola; Roberta Stallone; Antonio Dibello; Antonio Daniele; Massimo Petruzzi; Filippo Santarcangelo; Vincenzo Solfrizzi; Daniele Manfredini; Francesco Panza
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 7.581

3.  Development and validation of the Italian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-I).

Authors:  Edoardo Rella; Paolo De Angelis; Tiziano Nardella; Antonio D'Addona; Paolo Francesco Manicone
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Psychosocial changes in patients submitted to orthodontic surgery treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Isabela Bittencourt Basso; Flavio Magno Gonçalves; Agnes Andrade Martins; Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder; Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira; José Stechman-Neto; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Odilon Guariza-Filho; Cristiano Miranda de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  STANDARDIZATION OF DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT USING OHIP-5 - VALIDATION OF "RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE AND SCORING OF ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE VERSIONS".

Authors:  M T John
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.

Authors:  Mohammed Nasser Alhajj; Zaihan Ariffin; Asja Celebić; Abdulaziz A Alkheraif; Abdullah G Amran; Ibrahim A Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Anxiety in Chinese Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Zhuojun Xie; Chao Yang; Yuxi Zhao; Yichun Yang; Weiyao Xia; Yuan Zong; Ting Chi; Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang; Caixia Gong
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  The Implementation of PROMs/PREMs in the Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes: A Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Peerapong Santiwong; Kanakorn Sommaluan; Sivakorn Mokkasak; Chutiphon Rachuratchata; Thara Rattanaopas; Kawin Sipiyaruk
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 9.  Dental patients' functional, pain-related, aesthetic, and psychosocial impact of oral conditions on quality of life-Project overview, data collection, quality assessment, and publication bias.

Authors:  Stella Sekulic; Mike T John; Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson; Nicole Theis-Mahon
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 10.  Including the patient's oral health perspective in evidence-based decision-making.

Authors:  Danna R Paulson; Swaha Pattanaik; Phonsuda Chanthavisouk; Mike T John
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.595

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.