Yael Cohen1,2, Hagai Yasuor3, Dmitry Tworowski4, Elazar Fallik1, Elena Poverenov1. 1. Agro-Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Center, Institute of Postharvest and Food Sciences, Agriculture Research Organization, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel. 2. Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel. 3. Department of Vegetables and Field Crops, Agriculture Research Organization, Gilat Center, M.P. Negev 85280, Israel. 4. Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel.
Abstract
This paper reports one-step synthesis of polysaccharide-based nanovehicles, capable of transporting ionic zinc via plant cuticle without auxiliary stimulation. Delivery of highly hydrophilic nutritive microelements via the hydrophobic cuticle of plant foliage is one of the major challenges in modern agriculture. In traditional nutrition via roots, up to 80% of microelements permeate to soil and get wasted; therefore, foliar treatment is an environmentally and economically preferable alternative. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) was modified to amphiphilic N-octylamide-derivative (CMC-8), which spontaneously self-assemble to nanovehicles. It was found that hydrophobic substituents endow a biopolymer with unexpected affinity toward a hydrophilic payload. CMC-8 nanovehicles effectively encapsulated ionic zinc (ZnSO4) and delivered it upon foliar application to pepper (Capsicum annuum) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Zinc uptake and translocation in plants were monitored by SEM-EDS and fluorescence microscopic methods. In planta monitoring of the carrier was done by labeling nanovehicles with fluorescent carbon dots. Three-dimensional (3-D) structural modeling and conformational dynamics explained the CMC-8 self-assembly mechanism and zinc coordination phenomenon upon introduction of hydrophobic substituents.
This paper reports one-step synthesis of polysaccharide-based nanovehicles, capable of transporting ionic zinc via plant cuticle without auxiliary stimulation. Delivery of highly hydrophilic nutritive microelements via the hydrophobic cuticle of plant foliage is one of the major challenges in modern agriculture. In traditional nutrition via roots, up to 80% of microelements permeate to soil and get wasted; therefore, foliar treatment is an environmentally and economically preferable alternative. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) was modified to amphiphilic N-octylamide-derivative (CMC-8), which spontaneously self-assemble to nanovehicles. It was found that hydrophobic substituents endow a biopolymer with unexpected affinity toward a hydrophilic payload. CMC-8 nanovehicles effectively encapsulated ionic zinc (ZnSO4) and delivered it upon foliar application to pepper (Capsicum annuum) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Zinc uptake and translocation in plants were monitored by SEM-EDS and fluorescence microscopic methods. In planta monitoring of the carrier was done by labeling nanovehicles with fluorescent carbon dots. Three-dimensional (3-D) structural modeling and conformational dynamics explained the CMC-8 self-assembly mechanism and zinc coordination phenomenon upon introduction of hydrophobic substituents.
In modern
plant cultivation,
there is a heavy shortage of nutritional microelements from natural
sources, and their external supply has been practiced worldwide.[1,2] Plant nutrition is routinely done via root systems
using irrigation with nutrient-rich water (fertigation) or by adding
solid fertilizers to soil. However, the root-based nutrition approach
suffers from serious drawbacks, such as (a) low efficacy and economical
invalidity, because most of the supplied bioactive compound does not
reach the plant but is washed away with irrigation or rainwater ;
(b) undesired environmental impact and pollution of ground water;
and (c) lack of control of the amount of active agents intake by plants.[3] In the foliar nutrition, microelements are directly
applied on plant leaves,[4] an economically
and environmentally favorable alternative[5] that also benefits from higher efficacy.[6,7] The
main problem associated with foliar application is the obstruction
of hydrophilic nutritional microelement penetration by lipophilic
cuticles on plant leaves.[8,9] Microelements can enter
the leaves through stomata but not as a mass flow.[9−12] Numerous studies have been dedicated
to understanding foliar uptake of ionic solutes by investigating the
influence of humidity, temperature, microelement ion size, and surfactants
on this process.[12−14] Zinc microelement is necessary for normal plant development.
Its deficiency is associated with the disruption of enzymatic processes,
leading to inhibition of photosynthesis, increasing membrane leakiness,
and other harmful processes.[15,16]With significant
progress in materials science and nanotechnology,
advanced delivery systems have been suggested for agricultural applications
in general and for foliar delivery in particular.[17−19] The advanced
nanomaterials that have been reported to pass through plant cuticle
are nanostructured liquid crystalline particles,[20] coated gold nanoparticles,[21] aerosol nanoparticles,[22]etc. Specifically, for transcuticular delivery of microelements, biofunctional
microgels,[23] nanoparticle–liposome
composites,[24] and metal–organic
frameworks (MOFs)[25] were reported. In the
design of all these advanced nanomaterials, the nature of the carrier
material plays a crucial role in their success. Among the different
carriers for plant application, polysaccharides seem to be very promising
candidates, as they are green, biocompatible, and inexpensive. Polysaccharides
have been successfully applied for biomedical, food, and cosmetics
applications.[26−28] In plants, polysaccharide-based systems were reported
to perform foliar delivery of hydrophobic cargo, such as pesticides
and hormones.[29−32] Delivery of microelements remains quite naive for polysaccharide-based
delivery systems. To the best of our knowledge, only one work, where
the foliar delivery of zinc was done by nanoparticles that were formed
by reacting chitosan with tripolyphosphate cross-linker, has been
reported in this regard.[33]The modified
amphiphilic polysaccharides that are capable of spontaneous
self-assembling are regarded to be the next-generation delivery materials
as they have demonstrated excellent performance in drug delivery.[34−36] Recently, it was reported that self-assembling modified polysaccharides
are capable of successfully transporting molecular cargo via hydrophobic biological barriers. For instance, they showed efficient
transdermal delivery of hydrophilic molecules.[37−40] The successful transdermal delivery
encouraged us to examine self-assembled polysaccharides for foliar
delivery of nutrients in plants. However, this objective is very challenging,
as it involves encapsulation and transportation of extremely hydrophilic
ionic microelements across the highly hydrophobic cuticle of the leaves.[41] In addition, plants can be pH-sensitive; therefore,
using polysaccharides that do not require acidic or basic pH for their
dissolving are desired.In this paper, we aimed to develop a
polysaccharide-based system,
capable of encapsulating a hydrophilic plant nutrient, ionic zinc,
and deliver it through the hydrophobic cuticular leaves. Carboxymethyl
cellulose (CMC) was modified to form amphiphilic N-octylamide-derivative (CMC-8) vehicles that have effectively encapsulated
zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) and delivered it via foliar application to pepper (Capsicum annuum) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Fluorescent carbon dots were synthesized and covalently
attached to CMC-8 vehicles for in planta monitoring
of their uptake and translocation by the plant leaves. Molecular dynamic
calculations explained the self-assembly mechanism of CMC-8 and the
observed phenomenon, where introduction of hydrophobic substituents
provided the modified polysaccharide with an ability to coordinate
and transport the highly hydrophilic payload.
Results and Discussion
N-Octylamide-substituted CMC polysaccharide, termed
CMC-8, was synthesized via a one-pot reaction between
carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and octyl amine, utilizing N-hydroxysuccinimide as a catalyst and 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodiimide
hydrochloride as a coupling agent (Figure ). Octyl substituents provided the polysaccharide
with amphiphilicity, allowing spontaneous self-assemble to form nanosized
aggregates above the “critical aggregation concentration”,
found to be 0.62 ± 0.12 mg/mL. Notably, the original CMC did
not show any aggregation and self-assembly ability. Transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) confirmed the formation of CMC-8 nanostructures (Figure ). A distinctive
along-chain modification mode provided the resulting CMC-8 with a
dynamic structure enabling encapsulation of not only hydrophobic but
also hydrophilic and even ionic guests. Unlike classic micelles, which
possess a hydrophobic core and hydrophilic shell, the CMC-8 aggregates
have simultaneous hydrophilic and hydrophobic areas and were further
confirmed in this work by molecular modeling and conformational analysis.
Figure 1
(A) Synthesis
of N-octyl-amide polysaccharide
CMC-8 and (B) schematic representation of the formation of self-assembled
aggregate of CMC-8.
Figure 7
TEM images of (A) CMC-8
and (B) CMC-8-CDs in aqueous media in concentration
of 15 mg/mL. Scale bar is set to 100 nm. (C) Zinc (Zn) and sulfur
(S) weight percentage (wt %), calculated by EDS, in presence (+) and
absence (−) of 500 ppm of ZnSO4 for CMC-8 (gray)
and CMC-8-CDs (blue).
(A) Synthesis
of N-octyl-amide polysaccharide
CMC-8 and (B) schematic representation of the formation of self-assembled
aggregate of CMC-8.The ATR-FTIR and 1H NMR spectroscopy confirmed the formation
and isolation of CMC-8 product with no trace of the reactants (Figure A, B). ATR-FTIR spectrum
showed an aliphatic peak at 1317 cm–1, related to
the coupled octyl chain (alkane, C–H, bending); the amide carbonyl
and N–H bending frequencies and C–N stretch frequencies
appeared at 1580 cm–1 1249 cm–1, respectively. 1H NMR scans have displayed the aliphatic
protons of the coupled alkyl chain at 0.86–1.91 ppm and α
amide protons at 2.9 ppm. The degree of CMC-8 substitution was calculated
using total organic carbon method and was found to be 22%.
Figure 2
(A) ATR-FTIR
spectra, (B) 400 MHz 1H NMR spectra, (C)
TGA diagrams with the derivative curves in the inset (C.1 and C.2)
and (D) DSC diagrams of the original CMC and CMC-8.
(A) ATR-FTIR
spectra, (B) 400 MHz 1H NMR spectra, (C)
TGA diagrams with the derivative curves in the inset (C.1 and C.2)
and (D) DSC diagrams of the original CMC and CMC-8.Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning
calorimetry
(DSC) studies of CMC-8 were performed and compared to that of the
original CMC (Figure C, D). The modification did not lead to drastic changes in the thermal
profile of the modified polymer. In TGA, CMC displayed a relatively
linear pattern, while CMC-8 displayed a declining pattern until the
large pyrolytic events occurred at 290.9 and 290.4 °C (according
to their derivative curves) with weight loss of 47.9% and 52.9% and
overall weight loss of 66.6% and 79.0% for CMC and CMC-8, respectively.
CMC-8 displayed an additional event at 190.3 °C, which might
be related to the breaking down of the amide bonds between the aliphatic
chains and CMC.[42] In DSC studies, CMC and
CMC-8 also showed similar diagrams with the decomposition temperatures
above 280 °C, indicating thermal resistance. Although octyl amine
substitution barely affected the polymer’s thermal stability,
the two polymers displayed differences in their decomposition patterns,
evidencing modification.The CMC-8 and CMC polymers were examined
by gel permeation chromatography,
utilizing dextran as a calibrating standard to determine the number-average
molecular weight (Mn) as a function of
retention time, resulting in Mn of 1277
kDa for CMC-8 and 154 kDa for CMC. It is important to note that spatial
structure significantly influences polymer’s retention time.
Because the original CMC has no assembling abilities and CMC-8 is
a self-assembled aggregate, the received Mn values illustrate a difference between the two polymers but cannot
be taken for precise evaluation of molecular weight.[43]
Computational Modeling Study
Three-dimensional structural
modeling, continuum electrostatics calculations, and analysis of polymer
chain conformational dynamics were performed to get insight into the
self-assembly mechanism of CMC-8 and to understand how the introduction
of hydrophobic substituents has led to the enhancement in affinity
to highly hydrophilic ionic zinc. The molecular composition of the
studied polymers is extremely complex and was found to contain 27
different types of monomers (Figures S1–S3). Based on these monomers, a library of random 100 and 1000 length
polymer chains was generated (as described in Experimental
Section). It was found that negative electrostatic potential
is nonuniformly distributed along the polymer chain but is concentrated
near 2,3,6-tri-O-(carboxymethyl)glucose monomers possessing the highest
negative total charge of −3e. Theoretically,
there are ∼29–30 such negative potential sites per one
1000 monomer length CMC molecule and ∼22 sites per one 1000
monomer length CMC-8 molecule (Figure ). It is reasonable to assume these negatively charged
sites are favorable for Zn2+ binding.
Figure 3
Color maps represent
the 3D distribution of the electrostatic potential
along CMC (A and B) and CMC-8 (C) chain ranging from the negative
(red and yellow) to the neutral and positive (green and blue) values.
Positive Zn2+ ions shown as small dark-blue spheres tend
to diffuse into the negative electrostatic potential areas. Structures
and surface maps were visualized in Chimera.[44]
Color maps represent
the 3D distribution of the electrostatic potential
along CMC (A and B) and CMC-8 (C) chain ranging from the negative
(red and yellow) to the neutral and positive (green and blue) values.
Positive Zn2+ ions shown as small dark-blue spheres tend
to diffuse into the negative electrostatic potential areas. Structures
and surface maps were visualized in Chimera.[44]Interestingly, according to experimental
data, despite the similar
and even lower amount of potential Zn2+ binding sites,
CMC-8 is a more pronounced Zn2+ carrier compared to the
unmodified CMC. This phenomenon was further explained by conformational
dynamics analysis, which revealed that hydrophobic interactions between
the alkyl substituents in CMC-8 drive the self-assembly of semiflexible
polymer chains and promote the formation of compact structures (Figure ). Because of such
aggregation, stronger electrostatic potential is generated by several
negatively charged sites, forming the areas with strong electrostatic
affinity toward Zn2+ ions. On the other hand, the unmodified
CMC polymers do not undergo self-assembly, and the negative electrostatic
potential generated by a single charged site is not sufficient for
the strong binding of Zn2+.
Figure 4
CMC-8 molecules. (A)
Three polymer molecules (green sticks) form
an alkyl-8 hydrophobic cluster (green spheres). For clarity, only
10 polymer molecules (white and green sticks) are shown. (B) The red
“cloud” represents strong negative electrostatic potential
generated by the cluster of 9 COO– groups (red sticks).
Positive Zn2+ ions (small dark-blue spheres) tend to move/diffuse
into the areas of the negative electrostatic potential. The alkyl
hydrophobic cluster (green spheres) is created by 5 alkyl groups.
(C) Same as panel B except for the green color change. The binding
stoichiometry in atomic detail: The alkyl-8 hydrophobic cluster is
created by 5 alkyl groups from three polymer molecules 1 (green),
2 (lemon), and 3 (forest); each alkyl from the molecule 2 interacts
with one alkyl of the molecule 3, and one of the “lemon”
alkyl groups also binds with the “green” alkyl of the
molecule 1. Figures were prepared in PyMOL.[45]
CMC-8 molecules. (A)
Three polymer molecules (green sticks) form
an alkyl-8 hydrophobic cluster (green spheres). For clarity, only
10 polymer molecules (white and green sticks) are shown. (B) The red
“cloud” represents strong negative electrostatic potential
generated by the cluster of 9 COO– groups (red sticks).
Positive Zn2+ ions (small dark-blue spheres) tend to move/diffuse
into the areas of the negative electrostatic potential. The alkyl
hydrophobic cluster (green spheres) is created by 5 alkyl groups.
(C) Same as panel B except for the green color change. The binding
stoichiometry in atomic detail: The alkyl-8 hydrophobic cluster is
created by 5 alkyl groups from three polymer molecules 1 (green),
2 (lemon), and 3 (forest); each alkyl from the molecule 2 interacts
with one alkyl of the molecule 3, and one of the “lemon”
alkyl groups also binds with the “green” alkyl of the
molecule 1. Figures were prepared in PyMOL.[45]The close insight into the mechanism
of Zn coordination by the
self-assembled CMC-8 is illustrated as follows. In CMC-8, there are
approximately six to seven “hydrophobic spots” with
alkyl–alkyl chain interactions that can trigger a hydrophobic
patch formation and spontaneous self-assembly. For example, three
polymer molecules (green sticks, Figure A) form an alkyl hydrophobic cluster (green
spheres). In proximity to the alkyl cluster (∼10–15
Å apart), carboxy groups from different polymer chains create
the Zn2+ binding site (red area, Figure A). Upon a closer look on the binding site,
the red “cloud” around the red sticks represents strong
negative electrostatic potential generated by the cluster of nine
COO– groups. Mobile Zn2+ cations (dark-blue
spheres) tend to move toward the area on strong negative potential
(Figure B).More atomic details on the binding stoichiometry are highlighted
in Figure C. Specifically,
the alkyl hydrophobic cluster is created by five alkyl groups from
three different polymer molecules (green-1, lemon-2, and forest-3):
each alkyl from the lemon molecule interacts with one alkyl from the
forest molecule. In addition, one lemon’s alkyl group interacts
with green’s alkyl. The carboxyl cluster composition (red sticks)
includes four and three carboxy groups from the green and lemon polymers,
respectively, and three carboxyls from a nearby environment “white”
molecule (Figure C).
The electrostatic potential (red “cloud”), generated
by this acidic cluster can accumulate up to 7–8 Zn2+ ions (dark-blue spheres). Figure represents a typical pattern of interactions that
drive the self-assembly of CMC-8 aggregates and their ability of Zn2+ binding.Thus, although pristine CMC has numerous
sites for ionic interactions
between Zn2+ and COO–, these interactions
are dynamic and Zn ions can easily decoordinate in an aqueous solution.
On the other hand, in the self-assembled CMC-8, clouds of negative
electrostatic potential are generated by numerous COO– groups. In such clouds, electrostatic interactions with Zn2+ ions are stronger. In addition, because of trapping inside the nanovehicle
that also has hydrophobic moieties, Zn2+ ion migration
back to the bulk aqueous solution is therefore restricted/limited.
Together these factors endow CMC-8 with stronger Zn2+ encapsulation
capability in comparison to the unmodified polymer.
Foliar Delivery
of Ionic Zinc
The ability of CMC-8
to serve as nanovehicles for delivery of ionic zinc was examined.
Zinc is a vital microelement for plant nutrition, and foliar delivery
of zinc is extremely challenging because the highly hydrophilic nature
of zinc ions obstructs their permeation via the hydrophobic
barrier of the plant cuticle.[46] The aqueous
solution of CMC-8 loaded with ZnSO4 (500 ppm) was dropped
on the leaf of pepper plant (C. annuum), and the microelement’s distribution in the leaf petiole
was monitored using zinc-staining fluorescence dye (Zinpyr-1). The
delivery of ionic zinc by unmodified CMC and ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA), the traditional chelating agent used for foliar application
of microelements, were also examined for comparison. Distilled water
treatment, without the addition of zinc, was used as a negative control.
It can be seen that CMC-8 delivery systems resulted in a significant
increase of zinc concentration in qualitative and quantitative measurements,
indicating their ability to enhance the foliar delivery of highly
hydrophilic ionic zinc. EDTA and unmodified CMC did not result in
any significant increase. CMC-8 treatment did not show any visual
toxicity. The treated leaves remained green, healthy, and unharmed,
as can be seen in their images that were taken 24 h after the treatment
(Figure ).
Figure 5
(A–F)
Fluorescence stereoscope images and (G) fluorescence
quantification concentration of zinc stained with zynpir-1 (10 μM
for 1 h in the dark at room temp). Fluorescent images are cross sections
of pepper leaf petiole down the treated area in the presence of CMC-8,
EDTA, and CMC delivery systems. Zinc concentration was set to 500
ppm. All samples were tested in eight repetitions. Distilled water
treatment, MgSO4, and CMC-8 were used as the negative controls.
Values with different letters are significantly different according
to Tukey HSD test at p ≤ 0.05. (H and I) Pepper
leaf images after 24 h (H) control and (I) CMC-8 treatments.
(A–F)
Fluorescence stereoscope images and (G) fluorescence
quantification concentration of zinc stained with zynpir-1 (10 μM
for 1 h in the dark at room temp). Fluorescent images are cross sections
of pepper leaf petiole down the treated area in the presence of CMC-8,
EDTA, and CMC delivery systems. Zinc concentration was set to 500
ppm. All samples were tested in eight repetitions. Distilled water
treatment, MgSO4, and CMC-8 were used as the negative controls.
Values with different letters are significantly different according
to Tukey HSD test at p ≤ 0.05. (H and I) Pepper
leaf images after 24 h (H) control and (I) CMC-8 treatments.Zinc uptake and translocation in plants were monitored
by energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in conjunction with scanning electron
microscope (EDS-SEM) and fluorescence microscope. In addition to monitoring
zinc payload, we also aimed to view the in planta carrier, CMC-8. For this purpose, CMC-8 vehicles were labeled with
fluorescent carbon dots (CD). The CD labeling method possesses numerous
advantages in comparison to traditional fluorophores, because CDs
do not affect solubility or activity of the labeled molecule.[47,48] In this work, CDs were prepared via hydrothermal
carbonization of polysaccharide chitosan[49] and covalently attached to CMC-8 by amidation reaction resulting
in photoluminescent CMC-8-CDs with a maximal emission intensity at
470 nm (Figures and S5).
Figure 6
Synthesis of CDs (A) and the labeled CMC-8-CDs
(C). Fluorescence
presentation of chitosan CDs (B). CLSM images of labeled CMC-8-CDs.
Scale bar is set to 5 μm (D).
Synthesis of CDs (A) and the labeled CMC-8-CDs
(C). Fluorescence
presentation of chitosan CDs (B). CLSM images of labeled CMC-8-CDs.
Scale bar is set to 5 μm (D).CMC-8 nanovehicles and the labeled nanovehicles (CMC-8-CDs) were
characterized for their size, zinc encapsulation ability, and stability
using TEM, SEM-EDS, and ζ-potential-DLS methods.TEM images of CMC-8 and CMC-8-CDs present similar pattern, with
numerous nanostructures of up to 15–40 nm size (the particle
size range was calculated based on over 70 measurements of individual
structures). SEM-EDS results indicated similar encapsulation ability
for CMC-8 and the labeled CMC-8-CDs nanovehicles in the presence of
500 ppm ZnSO4 (Figure ).TEM images of (A) CMC-8
and (B) CMC-8-CDs in aqueous media in concentration
of 15 mg/mL. Scale bar is set to 100 nm. (C) Zinc (Zn) and sulfur
(S) weight percentage (wt %), calculated by EDS, in presence (+) and
absence (−) of 500 ppm of ZnSO4 for CMC-8 (gray)
and CMC-8-CDs (blue).ζ-Potential measures
aggregation resistance of colloidal
dispersion; the higher the absolute ζ-potential values, the
more stable a dispersion is. Because CMC-based structures are negatively
charged, their ζ-potentials are negative. ζ-Potential
values of CMC-8 and CMC-8-CDs showed similar, highly negative values
of −54.4 and −55.4 mV, respectively, indicating the
good stability of the prepared nanovehicles. Upon the addition of
ZnSO4, ζ-potential values became less negative because
of the encapsulation of positively charged ionic zinc, resulting in
−23.3 and −25.4 mV for CMC-8+Zn and CMC-8-CDs+Zn, respectively
(Table S1).The tomato (S. lycopersicum) leaf’s
tip was dipped into aqueous solutions of the labeled CMC-8-CDs loaded
with ZnSO4, and movement of the nanovehicles was monitored
by EDS-SEM and fluorescence stereoscope. The EDS-SEM shows the increased
densities of carbon originated from the CMC-8 carrier; zinc and sulfur
originated from the payload. The fluorescence stereoscope images were
in correspondence with EDS-SEM, implying transportation of the loaded
CMC-8 through the vascular system of the plant. These observations
confirm the ability of CMC-8 vehicles to move against the water transport,
from the leaf tip downward the leaf petiole (Figure ).
Figure 8
(A) Leaf dipping experience illustration. (B)
Fluorescence stereoscope
and (C–H) EDS images of tomato leaf dipped into CMC-8-CDs solution,
after 24 h.
(A) Leaf dipping experience illustration. (B)
Fluorescence stereoscope
and (C–H) EDS images of tomato leaf dipped into CMC-8-CDs solution,
after 24 h.Thus, CMC-8 nanovehicles show
aptitude to transport ionic zinc
through plant cuticle without an external stimulation. Despite the
acquired hydrophobicity, CMC-8 has effectively encapsulated and delivered
the highly hydrophilic payload to pepper and tomato plants upon foliar
application. Notably, the unmodified CMC did not show any increase
in the Zn content (Figure ). In addition, the labeling experiments showed that nanovehicles
enter the plant together with the loaded zinc. The size and amphiphilicity
of the nanovehicles imply their possibility of crossing the cuticle
by a cuticular or stomatal pathway and symplastic or apoplastic transport.[21] All the mentioned possibilities can be a potential
mechanism that still needs to be clarified.These results present
an interesting phenomenon, where introduction
of hydrophobic substituents endow the polysaccharide with affinity
toward the ionic microelement. In general, modification of delivery
systems with hydrophobic substituents leads to an increase in their
affinity toward hydrophobic payloads. Encapsulation of ionic microelements
in the lipid systems such as liposomes has been done;[24] however, to the best of our knowledge, an increase of the
delivery system’s affinity toward a highly hydrophilic payload
due to modification with hydrophobic substituents has never been reported.
Conclusions
An amphiphilic polysaccharide-based delivery
system, CMC-8, was
synthesized, comprehensively characterized, and found to undergo spontaneous
aggregation to form soft nanovehicles. The prepared nanovehicles effectively
coordinated ionic zinc and demonstrated a capability to pass through
the plant cuticle barrier without any external stimulation. Efficient
uptake and diffusion of zinc were obtained upon foliar treatment of
pepper and tomato plants. Chitosan-based fluorescent carbon dots were
synthesized and covalently attached to CMC-8 nanovehicles allowing
their in planta monitoring.Three-dimensional
structural modeling and conformational dynamics
computational studies allowed us to understand the self-assembly mechanism
and explain the observed phenomena, where the presence of hydrophobic
substituents in CMC-8 enhances the ability to coordinate highly hydrophilic
zinc cations.The presented experimental and theoretical findings
may contribute
to the development of a green, feasible system for effective foliar
delivery of bioactive agents to plants and may find additional biotechnological
advances in diverse fields.
Experimental Section
Materials
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Mw = 250
kDa; DS= 0.9), n-octylamine, and n-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel,
Belgium). Acetic acid, pyrene, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
(EDTA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). 1-(3-(Dimethylamino)propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide
hydrochloride (EDC) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Lancashire, United
Kingdom). Dextran standards were purchased from PSS Polymer (Mainz,
Germany). Zinc sulfate heptahydrate was purchased from Fisher chemicals
(Dublin, Ireland). Chitosan (Mw = 890 kDa; DD ≥ 90%) was purchased
from Glentham (Corsham, United Kingdom). Ethanol and ethanol absolute
were purchased from Gadot-group (Netanya, Israel). Water (HPLC grade)
was purchased from Bio Lab (Jerusalem, Israel). Deionized water (DW)
was obtained by mechanically filtering them through a Treion TS1173
column. Deuterated solvent for NMR analysis (D2O) was purchased
from Armar Chemicals (Döttingen, Switzerland). All regents
and solvents were used without further purification.
Methods
Preparation
of Modified CMC
N-Alkylamidated
CMC-8 was prepared by dissolving 0.58% w/w carboxymethyl cellulose
(CMC) in 100 mL of DW at 60 °C. When the solution achieved homogeneity,
the solution was cooled to room temperature, then 1.3 mmol of EDC
and NHS were added. After 2.5 h, octyl amine was added at 1.3 mmol,
and the solution was stirred overnight. According to the manufacturer’s
specifications, the commercial CMC’s degree of substitution
is DS = 0.9, and its carboxymethyl groups were calculated as (0.571
gr/270 g/mol)·0.9, where 0.571 gr is CMC’s mass, 270 is
the molecular weight of glucose monomer, and 0.9 is the molar fraction
of the monomer. Octyl amine, EDC, and NHS were thusly added at 0.7
equiv with respect to CMC’s carboxymethyl groups. CMC-8 was
precipitated by adding 6 times the volume of ethanol compared to the
reaction solution volume. It was then isolated via centrifugation (5000 rpm), washed 3 times with ethanol, and dried
on a vacuum desiccator overnight.
Preparation of Chitosan
CDs
The chitosan-based carbon
dots (CS-CDs) were prepared based on a previous procedure.[49] In brief, 2 g of chitosan was dissolved in 42
mL of 2% acetic acid aqueous solution. The solution was sealed into
a Teflon equipped stainless steel autoclave for hydrothermal treatment
at 180 °C. After 9 h, the autoclaved material was cooled naturally,
followed by centrifugation at high speed (10 000 g-force) for
20 min at 4 °C in order to remove the less-fluorescent deposit.
The strong fluorescent brown solution was lyophilized to produce a
CS-CDs brown powder.
Preparation of CMC-8-CDs
CMC-8 (300
mg) was dissolved
in DW at 60 °C. Once the solution achieved sufficient homogeneity,
the solution was cooled to room temperature and 0.18 equiv of EDC
and NHS were added. After 2.5 h, CS-CDs were added at 0.18 equiv,
and the solution was stirred overnight by covering with aluminum foil.
The solution was lyophilized to obtain a crude brown powder. The crude
powder was washed 3 times with ethanol and dried overnight in a vacuum
desiccator.
ATR FTIR
ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was
conducted using
a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS5 FTIR spectrometer (United States).
CMC and CMC-8 powders were subjected to 32 scans at a 0.5 cm–1 resolution between 500 and 4000 cm–1.
NMR
1H spectra were performed using Bruker
Avance I and Avance III NMR 400 MHz spectrometers (United States).
Chemical shifts are presented in parts per million (ppm). The solvent
residual peak (H2O at 4.79 ppm) was used as calibration
peak. All NMR samples were prepared using D2O as the solvent
at 298 K. CMC peaks were found to be in accordance with previous publications.[50]
Degree of Substitution
The total
organic carbon (TOC)
and the total nitrogen (TN) were calculated by an elemental analyzer.
Measurement of C and N concentrations was done using Shimadzu, ASTM
D 8083 analyzer, United States (TOC-L with TNM), in water by high-temperature
catalytic combustion and chemiluminescence detection. CMC and CMC-8
powders were dissolved in DW to give final concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.The percentage CMC substitution of octyl amide was calculated by
the following equation:
GPC
Molecular
weights and polydispersity indices of
the CMC and CMC-8 were calculated using gel permeation chromatography
(GPC). Waters’ Alliance system e2695 separations module was
used (Waters, United States), equipped with a refractive index detector,
model blue 2414. The mobile phase used was HPLC grade water under
isocratic elution for 30 min at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. The injection
volume was 20 μL, and the temperature of both the detector and
columns was 30 °C. Analyses were carried out using an Ultrahydrogel
column, 1000 Å, 12 μm, 7.8 mm × 300 mm, 2–4000
kDa (Waters, United States). The molecular weights were calculated
relative to standard dextran known molecular weight with Mn (the number-average molecular weight) range of 3 300–333 000
Da. All data provided by the GPC system were collected and analyzed
with the Empower 3 personal dissolution software. CMC and CMC-8 powders
were dissolved in the mobile phase to give a final concentration of
1 mg/mL. The solutions were filtered through a 0.22 μm nylon
syringe filter.
TGA
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
was conducted
using a PerkinElmer TGA 8000 instrument (TA Instruments, United States).
Ceramic crucibles were loaded with 1–3 mg of each sample and
heated from 25 to 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min
under the flow of N2 (20 mL/min).
DSC
Differential
scanning calorimeter (DSC) measurements
were performed with a PerkinElmer DSC 6000 instrument (United States)
calibrated by means of indium and zinc standards. Thermograms of each
sample were obtained from the second heating run up to 440 °C,
after the first run of heating up to 160 °C and cooling to 50
°C at a constant rate of 20 °C/min, under an N2 purge of 20 mL/min. Aluminum crucibles with pierced lids were loaded
with 5–15 mg of each sample, and an empty aluminum crucible
was used as the reference.
Spectrofluorometry
Critical
Aggregation Concentration Measurements
The
fluorescent emission spectrum of pyrene (fluorescent probe) comprises
vibronic peaks that show a strong dependency on the polarity of solvent.[51,52] The ratio between two specific peaks (i.e., I3 ≈ 383 nm and I1 ≈ 373 nm) in pyrene’s spectrum was used as
a quantitative measurement for its microenvironment’s polarity.
Any change in the surrounding polarity, such as when pyrene is encapsulated
from an aqueous environment by a hydrophobic-cored aggregate, is expressed
by this ratio’s value.[53] Pyrene’s
highly hydrophobic nature and low water solubility (2–3 μM)
ensure its preference to be present in hydrophobic over hydrophilic
environment. These characteristics make pyrene an ideal fluorescent
probe for analyzing a substance’s critical aggregate concentration.
Diluent solution was prepared by adding 25 μL of pyrene stock
solution (0.49 mg/mL in Ethanol) into 50 mL of DW, to give a final
concentration of 1.2 μM. A 15 mg/mL of CMC-8 solution was dissolved
in the above diluent, and the mixture was stirred overnight. This
solution was repeatedly diluted by a factor of 2 with the above diluent.
Then, 150 μL of each solution was loaded onto a 96 well plate.
The fluorescence emission intensity from each well was scanned using
a Synergy HTX multimode reader device (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski,
United States). The excitation wavelength for pyrene was 340 nm, and
the emission band recorded was 360–400 nm, at increments of
1 nm. All samples were made in triplicate. CAC values were calculated
as the intersection between two linear lines depicting aggregate formation
dependent on concentration in solution.[53]
CDs Fluorescence Measurements
CDs fluorescence spectra
of CS-CDs (4 mg/mL) samples were measured in a standard 1 cm quartz
cell using a computer-controlled Shimadzu, RF-5301PC spectrofluorometer
equipped with a 150 W xenon lamp (Ushio Inc., Japan). The excitation
wavelength range for CS-CDs was 330–550 nm with a slit width
of 3 nm, and the emission band recorded was (λex +
20) – 700 nm with a slit width of 3 nm, at increments of 0.5
nm.
Confocal Microscopy
Laser scanning confocal microscopy
(CLSM) imaging was performed using a Leica SP8 laser scanning microscope
(Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), equipped with an OPSL 488 nm laser, HC
PL APO CS2 63×/1.20 water objective (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany),
and Leica Application Suite X software (LASX, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
CMC-8-CDs (16.4 mg/mL) were excited at 488 nm, and the emission signal
was detected with HyD (hybrid) detector in a range of 500–550
nm.
TEM
Samples (3 μL drop) of CMC-8 and CMC-8-CDs
aqueous solution (15 mg/mL) and the same solutions with addition of
500 ppm of zinc (CMC-8+Zn and CMC-8-CDs+Zn) were placed on glow-discharged
carbon-coated 300 mesh copper TEM grids (Ted Pella, Inc.). After blotting,
the samples were negatively stained with 2% aqueous solution of uranyl
acetate for 40 s and air-dried. The samples were examined by a FEI
Tecnai 12 G2 TWIN TEM operated at 120 kV. Images were recorded using
a 4k × 4k FEI Eagle CCD camera (ThermoFisher scientific, United
States).
ζ-Potential
Electrokinetic
properties (ζ-potential)
were determined by a Zetasizer (3000 HSa, Malvern Instruments Ltd.,
U.K.). ζ-Potential values of CMCs were measured at 4 mg/mL in
DW. The measurements were done in triplicate, and the obtained values
represent means ± standard error.
Dynamic Light Scattering
(DLS)
All measurements were
recorded on a Nano ZS ZEN3500 Malvern light-scattering photometer
equipped with a 50 mW laser at an operating wavelength of 532 nm.
All measurements were conducted at 23 °C (refractive index, 1.330;
viscosity, 0.890 cP for water) with an angle detection (θ) of
173°. CMC samples were prepared by dissolving 4 mg/mL in DW.
Each sample was measured three times, and the average Dh and polydispersity
(PDI) values were calculated.
Zinc Encapsulation Measurements
In vitro evaluation of the ability of CMC-8 and
CMC-8-CDs interaction with
ZnSO4. Drops (3 μL) of the different formulations
at 2 mg/mL and 500 mg/L Zn (ZnSO4) were put on a carbon
tape and allowed to dry at room temperature. Six drops were evaluated
for each formulation and cargo combination (with and without ZnSO4). Carbon tapes were mounted on a stub and scanned under SEM
(VEGA3, Tescan, Czech Republic) coupled with an EDS detector (model
X-act, Oxford Instruments, U.K.) according to Tan et al.(64) Zn, S, Na, Mg, and Cl distribution
and content at different locations on the leaf surface were detected
with the SEM-EDS. The distributions and content of the above elements
are presented as mass percentage (mass %) of the total weight of all
analyzed elements. SEM was operated with acceleration potential of
20 kV at a working distance of 15 mm and highest beam intensity (18
units in our specific SEM) and a spot size of 500 nm, and each scan
was for 3 min. To avoid missing results between Na and Zn due to overlapping
electron energies, Zn was detected only by its Kα energy.
Computational Methodology
Statistical Properties and 3D Models of CMC
Derivatives
The most detailed description of the statistical
properties of CMC
at different DS is given elsewhere.[54] This
experimentally derived/validated data enables the correct modeling
of N-alkyl amide CMC derivative, CMC-8. According
to this study, for a typical 1000-mer CMC chain with DS ≈ 0.9,
we could expect 360–370, 160–170, and 350–360
substitutions at positions 2, 3, and 6, respectively (Table 2 in Heinze
and Pfeiffer).[54] Further, the mole fractions
of unsubstituted, mono-, di-, and trisubstituted glucose monomers
in this CMC 1000-monomer chain are 330–340, 440–450,
190–200, and 20–30, respectively (Table 3 in Heinze
and Pfeiffer).[54] These two distributions
given for CMC with DS ≈ 0.9[54] were
used as a template for the structural modeling of N-octyl-amidated CMC (CMC-8) polymer chains.The CMC-8 macromolecules
were modeled as follows. In a cellulose chain composed of 1000 d-glucose units, 900 hydroxyls were randomly substituted by
carboxymethyl moieties (corresponding to DS 0.9). We have generated
100 random CMC polymer chains. The average composition of mono-, di,
and trisubstituted glucose monomers agreed with the statistics experimentally
observed in CMC with DS 0.9.Further, structures of CMC-8 polymers
were modeled by random N-octyl-amidation of CMC carboxy
groups according to our
experimental DS value of 22%, determined for N-octyl-amide
CMC derivative. For example, 200 carboxy groups were randomly replaced
by N-octyl-amide moieties/groups.
Molecular
Modeling, Conformational Analysis, and Electrostatics
In
the computational methodology applied to the CMC-based polyelectrolyte
systems, the experimental and numerical data on the distribution of
the carboxymethyl- (CM) and the N-octyl amide moieties
in CMC chains were used, as described above.Further, the methodology
comprised the following steps:(1) In silico generation of initial 3D structures
of the CMC-based polymer molecules with the realistic distribution
of CM and N-octyl amide CM groups in polymer chains
was done to mimic in vitro compositions. Random structures
with polymer chain lengths 100 and 1000 were generated. For CM groups,
the DS ≈ 0.9 in cellulose chains was used. The 22% (0.22) DS
of the CM groups by N-octyl amide groups was taken
as explained above. These in silico substitutions
in the cellulose chains were generated using our python program SubRandoMol.py
and the Indigo library/modules.[55] The cellulose
chains were built using CarbBuilder program.[56](2) Conformational sampling and the analysis of semirigid
CMC and
CMC-8 chains by using molecular dynamics (MD): Multiple 10–100
ns MD trajectories were generated for single 100 mer CMC and CMC-8
chains by using the MD protocols.[57,58] Different
CMC and CMC-8 single chains were placed into the 53 × 3 ×
3 nm3 box filled by ∼14 900 solvent (water)
molecules. Total charges of CMC (−90e) and
CMC-8 (−70e) molecules were neutralized by
90 and 70 sodium (Na+) cations, respectively. Molecular topologies
based on amber99SB and the carbohydrate GLYCAM06 force fields,[59] were prepared for GROMACS MD simulations using
AmberTools and acpype programs.[60] For each
trajectory, snapshots were collected, and the persistence length of
CMC and CMC-8 chains and conformational flexibility of CM groups and N-octyl-amide-CMC chains were analyzed.(3) Continuum
electrostatics model of the CMC-based polymers: In
our electrostatics calculations, we assumed that CMC and N-octyl-amide CMC polyelectrolyte chains are placed into a high-dielectric
solvent (water, with the dielectric constant ∼80), and surrounded
by mobile Na+/Cl– ionic cloud. The ∼100
mM (0.1 M) salt concentration was used. Distribution of the electrostatic
potential around CMC and CMC-8 polymer molecules was calculated using
the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation solver (NLPB) implemented
in the APBS program.[61] Computational details
are given in Tworowski et al.(62)(4) Self-aggregation of CMC-8 polymer molecules:
Molecular models
of self-assembled aggregates were created and optimized by using PackMol
program.[63] Random mixtures of 2700 conformers
of CMC-8 molecules with a chain length of 100 were placed into a 600
Å cubic box. These parameters correspond to a CMC bulk density
of ∼0.6 g/cm3.
Plant Model Experience
Model
Experience- Zn Staining
Pepper leaf and leaf
petiole were chosen as “hard” petiole that allow easy
hand cross sectioning and allow for Zn staining analysis; tomato plant
leaf was chosen because of its leaflets’ pointy shape which
allows easy operation of the dipping experiments.The histochemical
techniques of zinc (Zn) visualization are based on the formation of
the green-fluorescent complex with Zinpyr-1 (C46H36Cl2N6O5). Ten 3 μL drops were
applied using a pipet to the bottom part of the pepper leaf (C. annuum), just above the petiole (9 leaves per treatment, Figure S4). Treated plants were kept at room
temperature for 24 h; hand-cut cross sections of the petiole were
done using a razor blade, and sections were put in DW. Sections were
transferred to a Zinpyr-1 solution (10 μM) and kept in the dark
for 1 h at room temperature. After Zinpyr-1 incubation, sections were
washed in DW and observed using a fluorescence stereoscope. The fluorescent
images were captured with Nikon SMZ25 zoom stereoscopes. Zinpyr-1
signal was excited by a 500 nm filter, where the emission was collected
by a 535 nm filter (YFP). Petiole vascular was detected using excitation
by a 405 filter, where the emission was collected by a 460 nm filter
(BFP). Images were captured with a color camera (DS-Ri2, Nikon) operated
by NIS Elements BR software (Nikon). Zinpyr-1 quantification was performed
on the stereoscope images of petiole cross sections using the software
NIS Elements BR software. For each analysis, nine petiole cross sections
were measured. Zn concentration was adjusted to 500 ppm for all the
samples (EDTA-Zn, CMC-Zn, and CMC-8-Zn) in addition to H2O; MgSO4 (500 ppm) and CMC-8 were used as negative controls;
the CMC and CMC-8 concentrations were maintained at 4 mg/mL.
Carbon
Dots
Tomato leaves (S. lycopersicum) were used for in vivo assessment of CMC-8-CDs
using a leaf-dipping methodology (Figure A). Leaflets were immersed in an Eppendorf
tube containing CMC-8 or CMC-8-CDs solutions at 4 and 500 mg/L Zn
(ZnSO4) for 24 h. Leaves were placed on a microscope stub
and scanned in the scanning electron microscopy instrument (SEM; VEGA3,
Tescan, Czech Republic) coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
detector (EDS; model X-act, Oxford Instruments, U.K.).[64] Zn, C, S, K, and Na distribution and content
at different locations on the leaf surface were detected with the
SEM-EDS. The distributions and content of the above elements are presented
as mass percentage (mass %) of the total weight of all analyzed elements.
The SEM was operated with an acceleration potential of 20 kV at a
working distance of 15 mm, highest beam intensity (18 units in our
specific SEM), and a spot size of 500 nm, and each scan was for 3
min. To avoid missing results between Na and Zn because of overlapping
electron energies, Zn was detected only by its Kα energy. Before
sampling for the SEM-EDS, the treated leaflet was observed under a
fluorescence stereoscope (SMZ25, Nikon) using YFP filter (excitation
wavelength, 500 nm; emission wavelength, 535 nm), and the image was
taken using DS Ri2 color camera (Nikon). Stereoscope operation and
image analysis was conducted using Nis Elements Br (Nikon). The zinc
content in the tomato leaves treated with the regular CMC-8 and the
labeled CMC-8-CDs calculated by SEM-EDS resulted in similar values,
which confirm that CDs do not affect the delivery system’s
performance.
Authors: Elizabeth Jurrus; Dave Engel; Keith Star; Kyle Monson; Juan Brandi; Lisa E Felberg; David H Brookes; Leighton Wilson; Jiahui Chen; Karina Liles; Minju Chun; Peter Li; David W Gohara; Todd Dolinsky; Robert Konecny; David R Koes; Jens Erik Nielsen; Teresa Head-Gordon; Weihua Geng; Robert Krasny; Guo-Wei Wei; Michael J Holst; J Andrew McCammon; Nathan A Baker Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Yael Cohen; Roi Rutenberg; Guy Cohen; Boris Veltman; Raanan Gvirtz; Elazar Fallik; Dganit Danino; Evgeni Eltzov; Elena Poverenov Journal: ACS Appl Bio Mater Date: 2020-03-27
Authors: Pavani P Nadiminti; Yao D Dong; Chad Sayer; Phillip Hay; James E Rookes; Ben J Boyd; David M Cahill Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 9.229