| Literature DB >> 34816628 |
Xin Chen1,2, Yanjun Zhao1, Fayang Wang1, Daqiao Tong1, Lingxiao Gao3, Dongxiao Li1, Liangke Wu4, Xiaojing Mu1, Ya Yang2.
Abstract
Boosting the output performance of triboelectric nanogenerators via some unique methods is always a meaningful way to speed up their commercialization. However, the available approach to boost performance is mainly restricted to one physics effect based and the basic research of boosting performance via mutual coupling effects is little research. Herein, a new strategy is creatively proposed based on charge traps from mutual coupling effects, generated from g-C3 N4 /MXene-Au composites, to further promote the output performance of triboelectric nanogenerator. It is found that photon-generated carriers coupling surface plasmon effect enables composites filled into tribo-material with visible light is an excellent value in boosting performance. The charge traps from mutual coupling effects for boosting performance are analyzed theoretically and verified by experiments. The output power of boosting-triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) achieves a sixfold enhancement (20 mW) of normal TENG with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) in ambient conditions. This work provides a profound understanding of the working mechanism of mutual coupling effects boosting the performance of TENG and an effective way for promoting TENG output.Entities:
Keywords: mutual coupling effects; output performance; photon-generated carriers; surface plasmon resonance; triboelectric nanogenerators
Year: 2021 PMID: 34816628 PMCID: PMC8811832 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1The theoretical model of the boosting output performance of TENG via charge traps from 2D materials g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au composites. a) The method of boosting output performance of the TENG in this research. b) The mechanism for setting more charge traps. c) The UV–vis spectrum of the g‐C3N4, Mxene, and g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au composites. d) The theoretical model of the charge traps boosted‐TENGs. e,f) The simulation of the outputs of the TENGs with composites is contrasted before and after lighting.
Figure 2The preparation and characterization of the g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au composites. a1–a4) The preparation process of the g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au composites. b,c) The SEM images of the composite. d) The result of the XRD of the composite. e–g) The TEM image and element characterization of the composite.
Figure 3The output performance of the TENG with g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au composites in normal condition. a) The short‐circuit current of the TENG with composites. b) The open‐circuit voltage of the TENG with composites. c) The charges of the TENG with composites contrast with the normal TENG with PDMS. d) The output power of the normal TENG with PDMS. e) The output power of the TENG with composites.
Figure 4The output performance of the TENGs with composites under visible light irradiation. a) The short‐circuit current of the TENGs with the materials of g‐C3N4, g‐C3N4/MXene, MXene/Au, and g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au under the 0.6 times visible light irradiation. b) The open‐circuit voltage of the TENGs with g‐C3N4, g‐C3N4/MXene, MXene/Au, and g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au. c) The charges of the TENG four materials with the visible light. d) The output power of the TENG with g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au composites under visible light. e) The charge curve of the TENG with g‐C3N4/MXene‐Au composites under visible light.
Figure 5The sterilization system constructs based on TENG. a) The damage of the bacteria to human health. b) The system chart and image of the sterilization system. c) The mechanism of the sterilization process. d1–d6) The contrast of the sterilizing effect of TENG with composites and PDMS.