| Literature DB >> 34816621 |
Guzhalinuer Abulizi1, Patiman Mijiti1, Gulimire Naizhaer2, Gulixian Tuerxun1, Guzhanuer Abuduxikuer1, Yuan-Yuan Zhang1, Hua Li1, Tangnuer Abulimiti1, Guligeina Abudurexiti1, Kailibinuer Aierken1, Ling Lu1, Anaerguli Maimaiti1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The careHPV test as a primary screening method for cervical cancer has been proven to be the best option for Uyghur women in Xinjiang in a previous study. In this research, we aim to discuss the appropriate age for Uyghur women in Xinjiang to be screened for cervical cancer using careHPV.Entities:
Keywords: CIN2+; careHPV; cervical cancer; screening
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34816621 PMCID: PMC8683549 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Demographic characteristics of Uyghur women screened for cervical cancer (n = 11,000)
| Characteristic |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| 20–24 | 826 | 7.5 |
| 25–29 | 1289 | 11.7 |
| 30–34 | 1753 | 15.9 |
| 35–39 | 1809 | 16.4 |
| 40–44 | 2281 | 20.7 |
| 45–49 | 1428 | 13.0 |
| 50–54 | 883 | 8.0 |
| 55–59 | 508 | 4.7 |
| 60–64 | 161 | 1.5 |
| ≥65 | 62 | 0.6 |
| Educational level | ||
| Illiterate | 1516 | 13.8 |
| Primary | 6155 | 55.9 |
| Secondary | 2836 | 25.8 |
| Higher | 493 | 4.5 |
| Occupation | ||
| Farmer | 9733 | 88.5 |
| Non‐farmer | 1267 | 11.5 |
| Marriage times | ||
| 1 | 5563 | 50.6 |
| 2–3 | 4797 | 43.6 |
| >3 | 640 | 5.8 |
| Parity | ||
| ≤2 | 3904 | 35.5 |
| >2 | 7096 | 64.5 |
| Contraception | ||
| Condom | 870 | 7.9 |
| Intrauterine device | 6662 | 60.6 |
| Sterilization | 988 | 9.0 |
| Oral contraceptive | 747 | 6.8 |
| Other | 1733 | 15.7 |
FIGURE 1Age of Uyghur women at sexual debut and first delivery
Detection rate of HPV, cytology, and CIN2+ of Uyghur women when stratified by different age groups
| Age group | HPV(+) | Cyto(+) | CIN2+ | HPV(+)/Cyto(−) | HPV(+)/Cyto(+) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <25 ( | 66 (7.99%) | 24 (2.91%) | 5 (0.61%) | 54 (6.54%) | 12 (1.45%) |
| ≥25 ( | 940 (9.24%) | 405 (3.98%) | 162 (1.59%) | 692 (6.80%) | 248 (2.44%) |
|
χ2 = 1.434
|
χ2 = 2.356
|
χ2 = 5.736
|
χ2 = 2.164
| ||
| <30 ( | 167 (7.90%) | 59 (2.79%) | 17 (0.80%) | 132 (6.24%) | 35 (1.65%) |
| ≥30 ( | 839 (9.44%) | 370 (4.16%) | 150 (1.69%) | 614 (6.91%) | 225 (2.53%) |
|
χ2 = 24.920
|
χ2 = 8.614
|
χ2 = 9.684
|
χ2 = 2.495
| ||
| <35 ( | 319 (8.25%) | 107 (2.77%) | 33 (0.85%) | 261 (6.75%) | 58 (1.50%) |
| ≥35 ( | 687 (9.63%) | 322 (4.51%) | 134 (1.88%) | 485 (6.80%) | 202 (2.83%) |
|
χ2 = 5.794
|
χ2 = 20.459
|
χ2 = 14.549
|
χ2 = 14.313
| ||
| Total | 1006 (9.1%) | 429 (3.9%) | 167 (1.5%) | 746 (6.8%) | 260 (2.4%) |
Abbreviation: ASC‐US, atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus.
ASC‐US was used as the cut‐off for cytology positive results.
FIGURE 2Age‐specific prevalence of HPV, cytology, and CIN2+ detection rate. CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV, human papillomavirus.
Performance of careHPV on different age groups among Uyghur women
| Age group | Sensitivity% | Specificity% | PPV% | NPV% | AUC | SE |
| 95% CI of AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥25 | 92.0 | 22.4 | 25.6 | 93.2 | 0.578 | 0.024 | 0.002 | 0.532 | 0.625 |
| ≥30 | 91.7 | 22.7 | 27.0 | 93.3 | 0.580 | 0.025 | 0.003 | 0.531 | 0.629 |
| ≥35 | 93.1 | 23.8 | 29.4 | 94.8 | 0.593 | 0.026 | 0.001 | 0.541 | 0.644 |
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; HPV, human papillomavirus; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SE, standard error.
FIGURE 3ROC curve of careHPV test by different starting age for screening. ROC, receiver operating characteristic