Yoon Young Choi1,2, Eunji Jang3, Hyunki Kim4, Kyoung-Mee Kim5, Sung Hoon Noh2, Tae Sung Sohn6, Yong-Min Huh3, Ji Yeong An6, Jae-Ho Cheong2,7,8. 1. Department of Surgery, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Goyang-si 1205, Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul 03722, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul 03722, Korea. 4. Department of Pathology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul 03722, Korea. 5. Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea. 6. Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea. 7. YUHS-KRIBB Medical Convergence Research Institute, Seoul 03722, Korea. 8. Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Benefits of adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial. Additionally, an effective biomarker for early GC is the need of the hour. The prognostic and predictive roles of single patient classifier (SPC) were validated in stage II/III GC. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the role of SPC as a biomarker for pT1N1 GC. METHODS: The present retrospective biomarker study (NCT03485105) enrolled patients treated for pT1N1 GC between 1996 and 2012 from two large hospitals (the Y cohort and S cohort). For SPC, mRNA expression of four classifier genes (GZMB, WARS, SFRP4 and CDX1) were evaluated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. The SPC was revised targeting pT1 stages and the prognosis was stratified as high- and low-risk group by the expression of SFRP4, a representative epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker. RESULTS: SPC was evaluated in 875 patients (n=391 and 484 in the Y and S cohorts, respectively). Among 864 patients whose SPC result was available, 41 (4.7%) patients experience GC recurrence. According to revised SPC, 254 (29.4%) patients were classified as high risk [123 (31.5%) and 131 (27.1%) in the Y and S cohorts, respectively]. The high risk was related to frequent recurrence in both Y and S cohort (log-rank P=0.023, P<0.001, respectively), while there was no difference byGZMB and WARS expression. Multivariable analyses of the overall-cohort confirmed the high risk of revised SPC as a significant prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR): 4.402 (2.293-8.449), P<0.001] of GC. A significant difference was not detected by SPC in the prognosis of patients in the presence and absence of adjuvant treatment (log-rank P=0.670). CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed the revised SPC as a prognostic biomarker of pT1N1 GC and suggested the use of the revised SPC for early-stage GC as like stage II/III.
OBJECTIVE: Benefits of adjuvant treatment in pT1N1 gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial. Additionally, an effective biomarker for early GC is the need of the hour. The prognostic and predictive roles of single patient classifier (SPC) were validated in stage II/III GC. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the role of SPC as a biomarker for pT1N1 GC. METHODS: The present retrospective biomarker study (NCT03485105) enrolled patients treated for pT1N1 GC between 1996 and 2012 from two large hospitals (the Y cohort and S cohort). For SPC, mRNA expression of four classifier genes (GZMB, WARS, SFRP4 and CDX1) were evaluated by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. The SPC was revised targeting pT1 stages and the prognosis was stratified as high- and low-risk group by the expression of SFRP4, a representative epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker. RESULTS: SPC was evaluated in 875 patients (n=391 and 484 in the Y and S cohorts, respectively). Among 864 patients whose SPC result was available, 41 (4.7%) patients experience GC recurrence. According to revised SPC, 254 (29.4%) patients were classified as high risk [123 (31.5%) and 131 (27.1%) in the Y and S cohorts, respectively]. The high risk was related to frequent recurrence in both Y and S cohort (log-rank P=0.023, P<0.001, respectively), while there was no difference byGZMB and WARS expression. Multivariable analyses of the overall-cohort confirmed the high risk of revised SPC as a significant prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR): 4.402 (2.293-8.449), P<0.001] of GC. A significant difference was not detected by SPC in the prognosis of patients in the presence and absence of adjuvant treatment (log-rank P=0.670). CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed the revised SPC as a prognostic biomarker of pT1N1 GC and suggested the use of the revised SPC for early-stage GC as like stage II/III.
Authors: Nan Song; Katherine L Pogue-Geile; Patrick G Gavin; Greg Yothers; S Rim Kim; Nicole L Johnson; Corey Lipchik; Carmen J Allegra; Nicholas J Petrelli; Michael J O'Connell; Norman Wolmark; Soonmyung Paik Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Razvan Cristescu; Jeeyun Lee; Michael Nebozhyn; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Jason C Ting; Swee Seong Wong; Jiangang Liu; Yong Gang Yue; Jian Wang; Kun Yu; Xiang S Ye; In-Gu Do; Shawn Liu; Lara Gong; Jake Fu; Jason Gang Jin; Min Gew Choi; Tae Sung Sohn; Joon Ho Lee; Jae Moon Bae; Seung Tae Kim; Se Hoon Park; Insuk Sohn; Sin-Ho Jung; Patrick Tan; Ronghua Chen; James Hardwick; Won Ki Kang; Mark Ayers; Dai Hongyue; Christoph Reinhard; Andrey Loboda; Sung Kim; Amit Aggarwal Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Wei Peng Yong; Sun Young Rha; Iain Bee-Huat Tan; Su-Pin Choo; Nicholas L Syn; Vivien Koh; Shi-Hui Tan; Bernadette Reyna Asuncion; Raghav Sundar; Jimmy Bok-Yan So; Asim Shabbir; Chee-Seng Tan; Hyo-Song Kim; Minkyu Jung; Hyun Cheol Chung; Matthew C H Ng; David Wai-Meng Tai; Ming-Hui Lee; Jeanie Wu; Khay Guan Yeoh; Patrick Tan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Steven M Teutsch; Linda A Bradley; Glenn E Palomaki; James E Haddow; Margaret Piper; Ned Calonge; W David Dotson; Michael P Douglas; Alfred O Berg Journal: Genet Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Jeong Il Yu; Do Hoon Lim; Jeeyun Lee; Won Ki Kang; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Seung Tae Kim; Su Jin Lee; Sung Kim; Tae Sung Sohn; Jun Ho Lee; Ji Yeong An; Min Gew Choi; Jae Moon Bae; Heejin Yoo; Kyunga Kim Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Young Min Kim; In Gyu Kwon; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh; Jaeyoung Chun; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park; Ji Hae Nahm; Jie-Hyun Kim; Yong-Min Huh; Eunji Jang Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-29 Impact factor: 4.964