| Literature DB >> 34813633 |
Rae-Young Kim1,2, Jae Hyun Park1, Mirinae Kim1,2, Young-Geun Park1,2, Seok-Goo Cho3, Young-Hoon Park1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in choroidal vascular structure and aqueous cytokine levels in eyes with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) after intravitreal methotrexate (MTX) treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34813633 PMCID: PMC8610271 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Fundus photo and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans of a 54-year-old male patient diagnosed with vitreoretinal lymphoma in his left eye.
(A) A fundus photo in the active phase (before methotrexate treatment) shows multiple whitish lesions on the macula, and this appears as subretinal infiltration on OCT (arrow). OCT shows obliteration of the sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and outer retinal hyper-reflective layer. Aqueous cytokine level analysis shows elevation in interleukin (IL)-10 (1720.0 pg/mL) and in the IL-10-to-IL-6 ratio (1720). (B) In the remission phase, the fundus photo shows loss of the whitish lesions, and OCT shows the absence of infiltration with the recovery of the RPE and outer-retinal layer. The sub-foveal choroidal thickness and choroidal area are decreased compared to that in the active phase. The IL-10 level (27.8 pg/mL) and IL-10-to-IL-6 ratio (5.35) have also decreased.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants.
| Patient No. | Age (years) | Sex | OD/OS | CNS or systemic involvement | IL-10 level at active phase (pg/mL) | IL-6 level at active phase (pg/mL) | Initial IL-10/IL-6 ratio | No. of intravitreal MTX treatments | Result of biopsy | Primary lesion | Systemic CTx | Result of systemic CTx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | F | OD | +, Brain | 2105.00 | 1372.00 | 1.53 | 7 | DLBCL | Brain with eye | HD-MTX | CR |
| OS | 5087.00 | 54.90 | 92.66 | 7 | ||||||||
| 2 | 64 | F | OS | +, Brain | 5231.00 | 100.30 | 52.15 | 8 | DLBCL | Brain with eye | HD-MTX | CR |
| 3 | 57 | M | OD | + Brain | 917.20 | 1.70 | 539.53 | 4 | DLBCL | Eye | HD-MTX | Relapse |
| OS | - | 9149.00 | 22.80 | 401.27 | 6 | |||||||
| 4 | 54 | F | OS | - | 613.40 | 5.50 | 111.53 | 3 | IgH gene rearrangement | Eye | None | |
| 5 | 78 | M | OS | - | 33277.00 | 122.70 | 271.21 | 13 | IgH gene rearrangement | Eye | None | |
| 6 | 54 | M | OD | +, Brain | 16107.00 | 554.70 | 29.04 | 27 | DLBCL | Eye | HD-MTX | Relapse |
| OS | 1720.00 | 1.00 | 1720.00 | 7 | ||||||||
| 7 | 71 | M | OD | +, Brain | 267.50 | 176.70 | 1.51 | 7 | DLBCL | Eye | HD-MTX | PR, poor general condition |
| OS | 248.10 | 62.20 | 3.99 | 5 | ||||||||
| 8 | 74 | F | OD | - | 1479.00 | 3.20 | 462.19 | 5 | Non-defined | Eye | None | |
| 9 | 63 | M | OS | - | 568.80 | 88.50 | 6.43 | 4 | IgH gene rearrangement | Eye | None | |
| 10 | 63 | M | OS | - | 8170.00 | 10.00 | 817.00 | 5 | DLBCL | Eye | HD-MTX | |
| 11 | 53 | M | OD | +, Brain | 4672.00 | 62.20 | 75.11 | 7 | DLBCL | Brain with eye | HD-MTX | PR |
| 12 | 53 | F | OD | +, Brain | 2160.00 | 12.20 | 177.05 | 8 | DLBCL | Eye | HD-MTX | PR |
CNS, central nervous system; F/U, follow up; IL-6, aqueous interleukin 6 level; IL-10, aqueous interleukin-10 level; IL-10/6 ratio, ratio calculated by the IL-10 level divided by the IL-6 level; No, number; OD, oculus dexter; OS, oculus sinister; MTX, methotrexate; CTx, chemotherapy; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; IgH, immunoglobulin heavy chain; HD-MTX, systemic high dose methotrexate; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission.
Comparison of clinical parameters at baseline (pre-treatment) and the point of clinical resolution after intravitreal methotrexate injection.
| SFCT | TCA | LA | SA | CVI | BCVA | IL-10 | IL-6 | IL-10/IL-6 ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study eye | Active phase | 290.8 ± 93.5 | 1.30 ± 1.79 | 0.98 ± 1.80 | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 63.5 ± 12.6 | 0.54 ± 0.44 | 5735.8 ± 8492.6 (2132.5) | 165.7 ± 349.0 (58.6) | 297.6 ± 447.9 (102.1) |
| (n = 16) | Remission phase | 244.4 ± 86.2 | 0.69 ± 0.23 | 0.45 ± 0.22 | 0.26 ± 0.06 | 61.2 ± 6.8 | 0.41 ± 0.49 | 1755.0 ± 6545.5 (2.9) | 849.2 ± 3143.6 (10.6) | 19.2 ± 48.1 (0.5) |
| p-value | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.025 | 0.390 | 0.176 | 0.001 | 0.733 | 0.003 | |
| Non treated fellow eye | Active phase | 241.3 ± 100.9 | 0.94 ± 0.37 | 0.60 ± 0.25 | 0.34 ± 0.12 | 63.21 ± 3.83 | ||||
| (n = 7) | Remission phase | 244.4 ± 103.1 | 0.92 ± 0.36 | 0.57 ± 0.23 | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 61.48 ± 2.35 | ||||
| p-value | 0.204 | 0.128 | 0.611 | 0.091 | 0.237 |
Pre-treatment was defined as the point before intravitreal methotrexate injection, and post-treatment was defined as the point at which the treated eye met the clinical remission criteria.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (median); TCA, LA, and SA in mm2; CVI in %; BCVA in logMAR; SFCT in μm; IL-10 and IL-6 in pg/mL; IL-10/6 ratio, obtained by dividing the value of IL-10 by the IL-6 value.
TOE, non-treated eyes; SFCT, subfoveal choroidal thickness; TCA, total choroidal area; LA, luminal area; SA, stromal area; CVI, choroidal vascularity index; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR, minimal angle of resolution; IL, interleukin.
A paired t-test was used for factors that satisfied normality, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed for factors that did not satisfy normality.
*p <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Fig 2Comparison of choroidal measurements in vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) eyes and their fellow eyes.
Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) is shown in μm, and the total choroidal area (TCA), choroidal stromal area (SA), and choroidal luminal area (LA) are shown in mm2. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. (A) In VRL eyes, the mean SFCT was 290.8±93.5 in the active phase and 244.4±86.2 in remission (p<0.001). Mean SFCT after maintenance treatment was 255.50±80.61, which was not significantly different from that in remission (p = 0.690). In the fellow eyes, the mean SFCT was 241.3±100.9 in the active phase and 244.4±103.1 in remission (p = 0.204). (B) In VRL eyes, the mean TCA was 1.30±1.79 in the active phase and 0.69±0.23 in remission (p = 0.001). Mean TCA after maintenance treatment was 0.81±0.31, which was not significantly different from that in remission (p = 0.051). In the fellow eyes, the mean TCA was 0.94±0.37 in the active phase and 0.92±0.36 in remission (p = 0.128). (C) In VRL eyes, the mean SA was 0.32±0.08 in the active phase and 0.26±0.06 in remission (p = 0.025). Mean SA after maintenance treatment was 0.29±0.07, showing a slight increase compared to that in remission (p = 0.027). In the fellow eyes, the mean SA was 0.34±0.12 in the active phase and 0.35±0.13 in remission (p = 0.091). (D) In VRL eyes, the mean LA was 0.98±1.80 in the active phase and 0.45±0.22 in the remission phase (p = 0.004). Mean LA after maintenance treatment was 0.51±0.24, which did not differ significantly from that in remission (p = 0.380). The post-treatment decrease in the choroidal area in VRL patients was more prominent for LA compared to SA, but there was no significant difference in the choroidal vascular index. In the fellow eyes, the mean LA was 0.60±0.25 in the active phase and 0.57±0.23 in remission (p = 0.611).
Correlation between the number of injections required for clinical resolution and other clinical values.
| SFCT | TCA | LA | SA | CVI | BCVA | IL-10 | IL-6 | IL-10/IL-6 ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of MTX treatment sessions needed for remission, N | Active | Correlation | -0.291 | -0.331 | -0.418 | 0.306 | -0.291 | 0.528 | 0.628 | 0.540 | -0.186 |
| phase | 0.275 | 0.210 | 0.107 | 0.250 | 0.274 | 0.035 | 0.009 | 0.031 | 0.491 | ||
| Remission | Correlation | -0.277 | -0.288 | -0.316 | -0.089 | -0.394 | 0.327 | -0.219 | -0.048 | -0.078 | |
| phase | 0.299 | 0.280 | 0.233 | 0.744 | 0.131 | 0.217 | 0.416 | 0.860 | 0.774 |
SFCT, subfoveal choroidal thickness; TCA, total choroidal area; LA, luminal area; SA, stromal area; CVI, choroidal vascularity index; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR, minimal angle of resolution; IL, interleukin; MTX, methotrexate.
Pearson’s correlation test was used if one of the factors satisfied normality; Spearmans’s rho test was used when neither of the factors satisfied normality.
*p <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.