| Literature DB >> 34813507 |
Shen Li1,2,3,4,5,6, Tomohiro Yokota1,2,3,4,5,6, Ping Wang1,2,3,4,5,6, Johanna Ten Hoeve7, Feiyang Ma3,4,5, Thuc M Le7,8,9, Evan R Abt7,8,9, Yonggang Zhou1,2,3,4,5,6, Rimao Wu1,2,3,4,5,6, Maxine Nanthavongdouangsy1,2,3,4,5,6, Abraham Rodriguez1,2,3,4,5,6, Yijie Wang1,2,3,4,5,6, Yen-Ju Lin6,10,11, Hayato Muranaka9,12, Mark Sharpley3,4,5, Demetrios T Braddock13, Vicky E MacRae14, Utpal Banerjee3,4,5,15, Pei-Yu Chiou6,10,11, Marcus Seldin16, Dian Huang4,6,8,17, Michael Teitell4,6,8,17, Ilya Gertsman18, Michael Jung19, Steven J Bensinger9,12, Robert Damoiseaux6,8,9,10, Kym Faull20, Matteo Pellegrini3,4,5, Aldons J Lusis1,2,12, Thomas G Graeber7,8,9, Caius G Radu7,8,9, Arjun Deb1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
Various populations of cells are recruited to the heart after cardiac injury, but little is known about whether cardiomyocytes directly regulate heart repair. Using a murine model of ischemic cardiac injury, we demonstrate that cardiomyocytes play a pivotal role in heart repair by regulating nucleotide metabolism and fates of nonmyocytes. Cardiac injury induced the expression of the ectonucleotidase ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 (ENPP1), which hydrolyzes extracellular ATP to form AMP. In response to AMP, cardiomyocytes released adenine and specific ribonucleosides that disrupted pyrimidine biosynthesis at the orotidine monophosphate (OMP) synthesis step and induced genotoxic stress and p53-mediated cell death of cycling nonmyocytes. As nonmyocytes are critical for heart repair, we showed that rescue of pyrimidine biosynthesis by administration of uridine or by genetic targeting of the ENPP1/AMP pathway enhanced repair after cardiac injury. We identified ENPP1 inhibitors using small molecule screening and showed that systemic administration of an ENPP1 inhibitor after heart injury rescued pyrimidine biosynthesis in nonmyocyte cells and augmented cardiac repair and postinfarct heart function. These observations demonstrate that the cardiac muscle cell regulates pyrimidine metabolism in nonmuscle cells by releasing adenine and specific nucleosides after heart injury and provide insight into how intercellular regulation of pyrimidine biosynthesis can be targeted and monitored for augmenting tissue repair.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34813507 PMCID: PMC8759793 DOI: 10.1172/JCI149711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Invest ISSN: 0021-9738 Impact factor: 19.456
Figure 1ENPP1 is expressed in the infarcted heart by nonmyocytes and is the principal ectonucleotidase that hydrolyzes extracellular ATP.
(A) qPCR demonstrating ENPP1 gene expression in the injured region of the heart compared with uninjured regions at 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after MI (n = 5). (B) Western blotting and quantitative densitometry demonstrating ENPP1 protein levels in injured and uninjured regions of the heart at 7 days following MI (n = 3). (C) ATP hydrolytic activity at various concentrations of the injured heart tissue homogenate compared with that in uninjured tissue homogenate 7 days after MI (n = 3). (D) Heatmap with gene expression patterns of ENPP1 (arrow) and other members of the ENPP and ectonucleotidase family in the injured versus uninjured regions of the heart (n = 4/time point). (E) ATP hydrolytic activity at 7 days after MI in WT mice and ENPP1asj/asj mutant mice (n = 3). (F and G) H&E staining and immunostaining for ENPP1 (green, arrowheads) in the uninjured (F) and injured (G) regions at day 7 after MI. Scale bar: 100 μm (high magnification). Low magnification: ×4. (H) Immunostaining for ENPP1 and vimentin in the uninjured and injured regions at 7 days after MI (arrowheads indicate ENPP1 and vimentin colocalization in merged images). (I and J) Immunostaining of ENNP1 expression in genetically labeled CFs in (I) Col1a2CreERT:R26Rtdtomato or (J) TCF21MCM:R26Rtdtomato mice at 7 days after MI (arrowheads indicate where ENPP1-expressing cells coexpress the fibroblast tdTomato label, representative images; n = 3). Scale bars: 10 μm. (K) Single-cell RNA-Seq of nonmyocytes at 7 days after MI demonstrating cell phenotypes in clusters and ENPP1 distribution (n = 3). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, 2-tailed Student’s t test (A–C and E).
Figure 2ENPP1 in the presence of ATP induces cardiomyocytes to release proapoptotic molecules.
(A) Coculture of rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (CMs, red) with control CF or ENPP1-CF (green) with or without ATP (arrowheads show decrease in ENPP1 CF). Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Number of CMs and CFs following 48 hours of coculture (n = 4). (C) Control CFs or ENPP1 CFs (green) in the presence or absence of added ATP but without any cardiomyocytes, and quantitation of cell numbers after 48 hours of ATP/vehicle addition (n = 3). Scale bar: 100 μm. (D) Transfer of control or ENPP1+ATP MCndM to CFs and images 48 hours later demonstrating decreased numbers of CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM (arrowheads). Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Flow cytometry to demonstrate the fraction of dead (PI+) or apoptotic cells (annexin V+, PI–) following treatment with ENPP1+ATP MCndM or control MCndM (n = 7). (F) TUNEL and caspase staining (arrowheads) of CFs treated with vehicle MCndM or ENPP1+ATP MCndM and (G) quantitation (n = 3). Scale bar: 50 μm. (H) CFs treated with vehicle MCndM, PPi MCndM, or AMP MCndM for 48 hours showing loss of cells with treatment with AMP MCndM (arrowheads) and (I) quantitation of dead cells (n = 7). Scale bar: 50 μm. (J) Treatment of macrophages, HUVECs, and human vascular smooth muscle cells (hVSMCs) with vehicle MCndM or ENPP1+ATP MCndM and (K) corresponding flow cytometry to determine cell death (arrowheads). (n = 6, BM macrophages; n = 6, HUVECs, n = 3 hVSMCs). Scale bars: 50 μm. (L) ENPP1+ATP MCndM does not cause cell death when added to myocytes (n = 4). Scale bar: 100 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, ordinary 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B, C, E, and I) or 2-tailed Student’s t test (G, K, and L).
Figure 3Genetic deletion of ENPP1 leads to enhanced cardiac repair and better preservation of postinjury heart function.
(A) Western blotting for ENPP1 expression in the hearts of ENPP1CKO animals at 7 days following cardiac injury and (B) quantitative densitometry of ENPP1 expression (n = 4). (C) B mode and M mode echocardiogram demonstrating better contractile function with decreased chamber dilatation at 4 weeks following cardiac injury (green arrows, diastole; yellow arrows, systole). (D) EF and fractional shortening as well as LV chamber size (LVID) in systole and diastole over 4 weeks after cardiac injury in control and ENPP1CKO animals. (E) Pie chart demonstrating fraction of animals with mild, moderate, and severe reductions in EF. (F) Masson trichrome staining demonstrating scar size (blue) measured at the apex and midventricle and (G) quantitation of differences in scar size as a fraction of the LV surface area. (H) Pie chart showing animals (%) with mild, moderate, and severe fibrosis. (I) Heart weight (HW), body weight (BW), and HW/BW ratios measured at 4 weeks following cardiac injury and (J) cardiac troponin T immunostaining to determine myocyte surface area (arrowheads) at the border zone and quantitation of myocyte surface area. Scale bar: 10 μm. (K) Number of capillaries (CD31 staining, arrowheads) in ENPP1CKO and control animals at 4 weeks after heart injury and quantitation of capillary density. Scale bar: 10 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, ordinary 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B), ordinary 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test (D), or 2-tailed Student’s t test (G, I–K). n = 14 in control and n = 16 in ENPP1CKO animals (D, E, and G– K).
Figure 4ENPP1 expression across 100 strains of mice correlates with cardiac function in an isoproterenol-induced cardiac injury model.
(A) Genetic variation of ENPP1 expression across 100 strains of mice following 3 weeks of isoproterenol or saline (control) infusion. (B–F) Cardiac traits of (B) cardiac mass, (C) EF, (D) fractional shortening, (E) LVID (diastole), and (F) fibrosis strongly correlating with ENPP1 expression across 100 strains of mice while (G) there is an absence of correlation with a trait such as heart rate. Data are shown as scatterplots. bicor, midweight bicorrelation coefficient and corresponding regression Student’s P value.
Figure 5Single-cell RNA-Seq of nonmyocytes in control and ENPP1CKO animals at 7 days following cardiac injury.
(A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) demonstrating different phenotypes of nonmyocyte cell clusters in the injured heart and (B) distribution of WT and ENPP1CKO cells across these clusters. (C) Fraction of endothelial cell, fibroblasts, and macrophages at 7 days following injury. Violin plot demonstrating (D) ENPP1 expression (**P = 5.29 × 10–132) and (E) UMAP demonstrating significantly reduced distribution of Acta2 (myofibroblast marker) in CFs of ENPP1CKO versus control animals and (F) quantitation (%) of myofibroblasts. (G) Violin plot demonstrating decreased expression of other myofibroblast genes Cnn2 (**P = 3.63 × 10–24) and Tagln (***P = 5.40 × 10–17) in ENPP1CKO fibroblasts. (H) Immunostaining for myofibroblasts (αSMA expression, arrowheads) in ENPP1CKO and WT animals and (I) quantitation of myofibroblast numbers. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. n = 5. **P < 0.01, 2-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 6GO analysis of nonmyocyte single-cell RNA-Seq at 7 days following cardiac injury.
(A) GO analysis demonstrating principal pathways upregulated in CFs of control mice versus ENPP1CKO animals. (B) Dot plot demonstrating principal ECM genes upregulated in control versus ENPP1CKO CFs 7 days after cardiac injury. (C) Dot plot demonstrating differential expression of pro- and antiapoptotic genes in CFs at 7 days after injury. (D) Dot plot demonstrating differential expression of inflammatory genes in macrophages of control and ENPP1CKO hearts at 7 days after injury. (E) Masson trichrome staining showing expression of collagen (blue) in the apical region of hearts of mice at 7 days following injury and (F) quantitation of fibrotic scar (arrowheads) size at 7 days following injury (n = 5). Scale bar: 1 mm. (G) Immunofluorescent staining demonstrating CD68 (macrophages, arrowheads) and CD31 (endothelial, arrowheads) staining in control and ENPP1CKO animals at 7 days following injury and (H) quantitation of cells by histology (n = 5). Scale bars: 10 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, 2-tailed Student’s t test (F and H).
Figure 7Proapoptotic molecules secreted by cardiomyocytes cause cell death only in cycling cells.
(A) Irradiated or nonirradiated CFs treated with vehicle or ENPP1+ATP MCndM for 48 hours. Cell death in irradiated but not in irradiated CFs (filled arrow) (B) Quantitation of cell death (n = 3). (C) PBS- or mitomycin C–treated CFs treated with vehicle or ENPP1+ATP MCndM for 48 hours; rescue of cell death with mitomycin (filled and unfilled arrowheads). (D) Quantitation of cell death (n = 5). Scale bar: 50 μm. (E–H) MEFs treated with vehicle or ENPP1+ATP MCndM following (E) irradiation or (G) mitomycin C. Rescue of cell death with irradiation or mitomycin C (filled and unfilled arrowheads) and (F and H) quantification of cell death following (F) irradiation (n = 3) or (H) mitomycin treatment (n = 3). Scale bars: 50 μm. (I) Principal component analysis of gene expression changes in CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM (n = 2). (J) GO analysis of main differentially expressed pathways in CFs following treatment with ENPP1+ATP MCndM. (K) Heatmap demonstrating expression of p53-driven apoptotic genes in CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM. (L) Cell-cycle analysis demonstrating G1/S phase arrest in CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM and (M) cells (%) in different phases of cell cycle (n = 3). (N) Western blot and quantitation for pH2A.X and pCHK-1 in CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM (n = 3). (O) Western blot and densitometry of p53 Ser15 phosphorylation in CFs treated with ENPP1+ ATP MCndM (n = 3). (P) p53 protein levels in p53CKO CFs (n = 3) (Q) p53CKO CFs treated with vehicle or ENPP1 MCndM demonstrating rescue of cell death in p53CKO CFs (filled and unfilled arrowheads) and (R) quantitation of cell death (n = 3). Scale bar: 50 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, 2-tailed Student’s t test (B, D, F, H, M–P, and R).
Figure 8CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP (MCndM) exhibit decreased pyrimidine levels.
(A) LC/MS-MS demonstrating decreased levels of intracellular pyrimidine nucleotides but not (B) purine nucleotides in CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM (n = 6). (C) CFs treated with vehicle MCndM or ENPP1+ATP MCndM in the presence of uridine, deoxycytidine, or both demonstrating (D) cell death (arrowheads) in CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM, but rescue of cell death (unfilled arrowheads) following addition of uridine, deoxycytidine, or both. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Flow cytometry to demonstrate effects on cell death following addition of uridine or deoxycytidine to CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM (n = 6). (F) Effect of adding deoxycytidine and deoxycytidine kinase inhibitor (dCKi) to CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM is a loss of rescue of deoxycytidine in the presence of dCKi (unfilled and filled arrowheads) and (G) quantitation of cell death (n = 5). Scale bar: 50 μm. (H) Outline of critical steps of pyrimidine biosynthesis. (I) Heatmap demonstrating differential expression of metabolites in pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway between CFs treated with vehicle MCndM and those treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM (n = 3). (J) Rescue of cell death following addition of OMP to CFs treated with ENPP1+ATP MCndM (filled and unfilled arrowheads) and (K) quantitation of cell death (n = 4). Scale bar: 50 μm. (L) Effect on cell death following addition of DHODH inhibitor brequinar (filled arrowheads) to disrupt pyrimidine biosynthesis and rescue with uridine (unfilled arrowheads). (M) Flow cytometry to determine effects of brequinar on cell death and rescue by uridine (n = 5). Scale bar: 50 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.**P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, 2-tailed Student’s t test, (B, I) or ordinary 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (E, G, K, and M).
Figure 9Adenine and specific purine ribonucleosides are myocyte-derived proapoptotic molecules that in combination cause cell death of nonmyocytes.
(A) Schematic shows ENPP1+ATP MCndM pass through the C18 HPLC column. Effects of eluted fractions of ENPP1+ATM MCndM on cell death (arrowheads) of CFs. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Effect of 7 metabolites on cell death (filled arrowheads) of CFs and its rescue (unfilled arrowheads) by uridine and (C) quantitation of cell death (n = 9). Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) CFs treated with 7 compounds together and following subtraction of each one from the combined solution show absence of cell death (unfilled arrowheads) when adenine is removed. Cell death, filled arrowheads. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Quantitation of cell death (n = 4). (F) Effects of cell death (filled arrowheads) following addition of adenine alone or adenine combined with specific purine nucleosides or orotate and (G) quantitation of cell death (n = 3). Scale bar: 50 μm. (H) Effect of OMP or uridine in rescuing cell death following addition of adenine and adenosine to CFs (filled and unfilled arrowheads) and (I) quantitation of cell death (n = 6). Scale bar: 50 μm. (J) CFs overexpressing yeast adenine deaminase treated with vehicle MCndM or ENPP1+ATP MCndM showing decreased cell death of CFs overexpressing adenine deaminase (filled and unfilled arrowheads). (K) Quantitation of cell death (n = 3). Scale bar: 50 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, 2-tailed Student’s t test (K) or ordinary 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C, E, G, and I).
Nucleosides/bases that were enriched in the 50% ACN eluates of ENPP1+ATP MCndM versus vehicle MCndM.
Figure 10Pyrimidine supplementation with systemic uridine administration is associated with significantly better cardiac repair and postinjury heart function.
(A) Schematic of continuous uridine administration by a subcutaneous pump starting 1 day prior to injury and continuing for 14 days after. (B) B and M mode echocardiogram demonstrating better preservation of contractile function during diastole (green arrows) and systole (yellow arrows) in uridine-injected animals. (C) EF and fractional shortening and LV internal diameter in systole and diastole following uridine administration. n = 15 (vehicle) and n = 15 (uridine) at basal, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 weeks; n = 14 (vehicle) and n = 15 (uridine) at 4 weeks. (D) Pie chart demonstrating fraction of animals with mild, moderate, and severe reductions in EF following vehicle or uridine administration. (E) Masson trichrome staining demonstrating scar size (blue) at apex and midventricles of vehicle- or uridine-injected animals and (F) quantitation of differences in scar size as a fraction of the LV surface area. n = 14 (vehicle) and 15 (uridine). Scale bar: 1 mm. (G) Pie chart demonstrating fraction of animals demonstrating mild, moderate, and severe fibrosis following vehicle or uridine administration, (H) Heart weight, body weight, and HW/BW ratio in vehicle- versus uridine-treated animals. n = 14 (vehicle) and n = 15 (uridine). (I) Histology demonstrating capillaries (CD31 staining) in injured regions of hearts 4 weeks after injury in vehicle- or uridine-treated animals and (J) quantitation of capillaries. n = 14 (vehicle) and 15 (uridine). Scale bar: 10 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ordinary 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test (C) or 2-tailed Student’s t test (F, H, and J).
Figure 11Animals treated with ENPP1 inhibitor myricetin demonstrate significant improvement in heart function after injury.
(A) Strategy for using myricetin. (B) Extracellular ATP hydrolytic activity in injured and uninjured hearts of animals treated with myricetin (n = 3). (C) B and M mode echocardiogram demonstrating contractile function in diastole (green arrows) and systole (yellow arrows) in hearts of myricetin-treated animals. (D) EF, fractional shortening, and LV chamber size in systole and diastole in vehicle- or myricetin-treated animals. n = 12 (vehicle) and n = 15 (myricetin) at basal, 1 week, and 2 weeks; n = 9 (vehicle) and n = 14 (myricetin) at 3 weeks and 4 weeks. (E) Fractions of animals with mild, moderate, and severe reduction in EF at 4 weeks after injury. (F) Scar size as a fraction of LV surface area. Scale bar: 1 mm. (G) Quantitation of scar surface area. n = 9 (vehicle); n = 4 (myricetin). (H) Fractions of animals with mild, moderate, and severe fibrosis following myricetin administration. (I and J) Immunostaining demonstrating (I) p53 (Ser15 phosphorylation) expression (arrowhead) in nonmyocytes in the injured region of vehicle- versus myricetin–injected animals and under higher magnification (myocytes are stained by troponin) and quantification (n = 4). (J) pH2AX staining in nonmyocyte cells (arrowheads) in vehicle- or myricetin-injected animals at 7 days following injury, under higher magnification and quantitation (n = 4, counts normalized to number of nonmyocyte nuclei for I and J). Scale bars: 5 μm (high magnification). Low magnification, ×40. (K) Metabolomic analysis of the hearts of myricetin-injected animals. (L) Decreased adenine+adenosine/uridine ratios in myricetin-injected animals (n = 3). (M) Metabolomic analysis of serum demonstrating decreased orotate and increased deoxyuridine (day 3) and increased orotidine (day 7) in myricetin-injected versus vehicle-injected animals (n = 3). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, ordinary 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test (D) or 2-tailed Student’s t test (B, G, and I–M).