Literature DB >> 34812498

New Onset of Smell and Taste Loss Are Common Findings Also in Patients With Symptomatic COVID-19 After Complete Vaccination.

Luigi A Vaira1,2, Andrea De Vito3, Jerome R Lechien4,5, Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba4,6, Miguel Mayo-Yàñez7, Christian Calvo-Henrìquez8, Sven Saussez4,5, Giordano Madeddu3, Sergio Babudieri3, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo9, Claire Hopkins10, Giacomo De Riu1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical profile of patients who developed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after full vaccination. Demographic, epidemiological and clinical data were collected through medical records and online patient-reported outcome questionnaire from patients who developed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab, at least 2 weeks after completion of vaccination. A total of 153 subjects were included. The most frequent symptoms were: asthenia (82.4%), chemosensory dysfunction (63.4%), headache (59.5%), runny nose (58.2%), muscle pain (54.9%), loss of appetite (54.3%), and nasal obstruction (51.6%). Particularly, 62.3% and 53.6% of subjects reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, respectively. Symptom severity was mild or moderate in almost all cases. Chemosensory dysfunctions have been observed to be a frequent symptom even in subjects who contracted the infection after full vaccination. For this reason, the sudden loss of smell and taste could continue to represent a useful and specific diagnostic marker to raise the suspicion of COVID-19 even in vaccinated subjects. In the future, it will be necessary to establish what the recovery rate is in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:419-421, 2022.
© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; ageusia; anosmia; gustatory dysfunction; olfactory dysfunction; vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34812498      PMCID: PMC9011575          DOI: 10.1002/lary.29964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


INTRODUCTION

Vaccines are the main weapon to protect population from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Vaccine safety has been widely demonstrated as well as their effectiveness in preventing the onset of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). The effectiveness in preventing symptomatic COVID‐19 is instead variable between 73% and 91% in patients with complete vaccination and for the currently known variants. , Furthermore, vaccines have been shown to be effective in reducing the duration of symptoms and accelerating viral clearance. To the best of our knowledge there are no studies reporting the clinical pattern of COVID‐19 after complete vaccination. The knowledge of these clinical pictures is important for posing the diagnostic suspicion of infection and because probably (and hopefully) these forms of vaccine‐mitigated COVID‐19 will be the ones that will remain after the immunization of the population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online questionnaire was released in August and September 2021 across Europe. The survey was aimed exclusively at subjects who had had symptomatic COVID‐19, confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab, at least 2 weeks after completion of vaccination. Compliance with the inclusion criteria was assessed with specific questions and subjects who did not meet them were excluded. The presence and severity of symptoms was investigated using the COVID‐19 symptom index. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Cagliari (PG/2021/7118).

RESULTS

Of the 176 responses collected, 23 were excluded as the subjects did not have a confirmed diagnosis so that 153 responses were considered in the analysis (99 females, 54 males, mean age 41.3 years). The anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination was performed with Pfizer/BioNTech (106 cases), AstraZeneca (32 cases), Moderna (12 cases), or Johnson & Johnson (three cases) vaccines. Table 1 shows the symptoms reported by the subjects. The most frequent were: asthenia (82.4%), chemosensory dysfunctions (CDs) (63.4%), and headache (59.5%). Particularly, 62.3% and 53.6% of subjects reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, respectively. Symptom severity was mild or moderate in almost all cases. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of CD between patients who received viral vector or mRNA vaccine.
TABLE 1

COVID‐19 Symptom Index Results.

No ProblemMild ProblemModerate ProblemSevere ProblemVery Severe Problem
I had fever (>38°C)88 (57.5%)40 (26.1%)19 (12.4%)6 (3.9%)0 (0%)
I was tired27 (17.6%)57 (37.2%)57 (37.2%)6 (3.9%)6 (3.9%)
I had cough85 (55.6%)53 (34.6%)15 (9.8%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had chest pain130 (85%)20 (13.1%)3 (2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had low/no appetite70 (45.7%)52 (34%)25 (16.3%)6 (3.9%)0 (0%)
I had joint pain78 (51%)55 (36%)12 (7.8%)6 (3.9%)2 (1.3%)
I had muscle pain69 (45.1%)55 (36%)23 (15%)6 (3.9%)0 (0%)
I had headache62 (40.5%)49 (32%)33 (21.6%)6 (3.9%)3 (2%)
I had diarrhea136 (88.9%)10 (6.5%)2 (1.3%)2 (1.3%)3 (2%)
I had abdominal pain145 (94.8%)3 (2%)2 (1.3%)3 (2%)0 (0%)
I had nausea or vomiting139 (91%)8 (5.2%)6 (3.9%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had conjunctivitis144 (94.1%)6 (3.9%)3 (2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had urticarias145 (94.8%)6 (3.9%)2 (1.3%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had breathing difficulties132 (86.3%)18 (11.8%)3 (2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had sticky throat mucus109 (71.2%)27 (17.6%)14 (9.1%)3 (2%)0 (0%)
I had nasal obstruction74 (48.4%)34 (22.2%)31 (20.3%)14 (9.1%)0 (0%)
I had runny nose64 (41.8%)54 (35.3%)25 (16.3%)10 (6.5%)0 (0%)
I had nasal burning76 (49.7%)55 (36%)22 (14.4%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had throat pain116 (75.8%)35 (22.9%)2 (1.3%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had ear pain or pressure123 (80.4%)23 (15%)7 (4.6%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had face pain or pressure122 (79.7%)26 (17%)2 (1.3%)0 (0%)3 (2%)
I had difficulties to swallow128 (83.7%)20 (13.1%)5 (3.3%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had hoarseness/voice difficulties113 (73.9%)28 (18.3%)12 (7.8%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
I had tongue burning136 (88.9%)15 (9.8%)2 (1.3%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
COVID‐19 Symptom Index Results.

DISCUSSION

As social distancing measures relax, vaccine‐mitigated forms of COVID‐19 are likely to become increasingly frequent or even endemic. It is therefore important to know their clinical pictures to predict their social and health impact. In the present series, the prevalence of severe respiratory symptoms such as dyspnea was very low (13.8%) and in any case mild (11.8%) or moderate (2%). The frequency and severity of symptoms is comparable to that reported by other authors in patients with second episodes of COVID‐19 while no data on infected subjects after complete vaccination are reported in the literature. In the present study, CD were observed to be a frequent symptom in COVID‐19 after full vaccination with similar prevalence to that reported in the past in unvaccinated patients. , , For this reason, the sudden loss of smell and taste could continue to represent a useful and specific diagnostic marker to raise the suspicion of COVID‐19 even in vaccinated subjects. In the future, it will be necessary to establish what the recovery rate is in these patients. Residual CD are in fact turning out to be one of the most frequent symptoms of long‐COVID‐19, with persistent anosmia rates beyond 6 months varying between 1% and 11%. , , , , , If this prevalence were so high even in vaccinated subjects, we could still have a high number of subjects who will require assistance for such disabling disorders. The risk factors and causes of persistence of CD in some patients have not yet been identified. , , , , Early studies found no significant correlation between serum immunoglobulin levels and duration of olfactory disfunction. , The correlation is instead significant with nasal immunoglobulin. Interestingly, it seems that patients with severe COVID‐19 had higher serum antibody levels while nasal antibodies were higher in milder disease. The effects of vaccination on the nasal immune response are yet to be verified and could represent a determining factor on the duration of CD in vaccinated patients. This study has several limitations: First, it is based on self‐reported olfactory and gustatory loss which may underestimate the true prevalence of CD. Second, the survey was aimed only at symptomatic subjects, a comparison with asymptomatic should performed in the future. Third, while immunization can also result in smell loss, an analysis of the differences between nonimmunized and immunized subjects that become infected could not be performed. The role of immunization should be investigated in the future. Fourth, although the delta variant was predominant at the time of the survey, we have no information regarding the virus strain that infected the patients. It is possible that this factor influenced the results of the study and the viral strain will need to be taken into account in future studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this survey, the sudden loss of smell and taste could continue to represent a useful and specific diagnostic marker to raise the suspicion of COVID‐19 even in vaccinated subjects.
  22 in total

1.  High prevalence of long-term olfactory, gustatory, and chemesthesis dysfunction in post-COVID-19 patients: a matched case-control study with one-year follow-up using a comprehensive psychophysical evaluation.

Authors:  P Boscolo-Rizzo; T Hummel; C Hopkins; M Dibattista; A Menini; G Spinato; C Fabbris; E Emanuelli; A D'Alessandro; R Marzolino; Enrico Zanelli; E Cancellieri; K Cargnelutti; S Fadda; D Borsetto; L A Vaira; N Gardenal; J Polesel; G Tirelli
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Prevalence of Persistent Olfactory Disorders in Patients With COVID-19: A Psychophysical Case-Control Study With 1-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Luigi Angelo Vaira; Giovanni Salzano; Serge Daniel Le Bon; Angelantonio Maglio; Marzia Petrocelli; Younes Steffens; Enrica Ligas; Fabio Maglitto; Jerome R Lechien; Sven Saussez; Alessandro Vatrella; Francesco Antonio Salzano; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Claire Hopkins; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.591

3.  Risk factors and characteristics associated with persistent smell loss in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Authors:  Bita Shahrvini; Divya P Prajapati; Mena Said; Jacklyn Liu; Shanmukha Srinivas; Samuel Jayaraj; Valerie J Lund; Adam S DeConde; Matt Lechner; Carol H Yan
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Clinical, virological and immunological evolution of the olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19.

Authors:  Eugenia Maiorano; Anna Calastri; Carlo Robotti; Irene Cassaniti; Fausto Baldanti; Valentina Zuccaro; Edoardo Stellin; Virginia V Ferretti; Catherine Klersy; Marco Benazzo
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Systemic inflammatory markers and psychophysical olfactory scores in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: is there any correlation?

Authors:  L A Vaira; A De Vito; G Deiana; C Pes; F Giovanditto; V Fiore; J R Lechien; S Saussez; D Policicchio; R Boccaletti; G Madeddu; S Babudieri; A Pazzola; F Bandiera; A G Fois; A F Piana; C Hopkins; G De Riu
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Anosmia and Ageusia: Common Findings in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Luigi A Vaira; Giovanni Salzano; Giovanna Deiana; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Systemic and mucosal antibody responses specific to SARS-CoV-2 during mild versus severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Carlo Cervia; Jakob Nilsson; Yves Zurbuchen; Alan Valaperti; Jens Schreiner; Aline Wolfensberger; Miro E Raeber; Sarah Adamo; Sebastian Weigang; Marc Emmenegger; Sara Hasler; Philipp P Bosshard; Elena De Cecco; Esther Bächli; Alain Rudiger; Melina Stüssi-Helbling; Lars C Huber; Annelies S Zinkernagel; Dominik J Schaer; Adriano Aguzzi; Georg Kochs; Ulrike Held; Elsbeth Probst-Müller; Silvana K Rampini; Onur Boyman
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Correlations between olfactory psychophysical scores and SARS-CoV-2 viral load in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Luigi Angelo Vaira; Giovanna Deiana; Jerome R Lechien; Andrea De Vito; Andrea Cossu; Marco Dettori; Arcadia Del Rio; Sven Saussez; Giordano Madeddu; Sergio Babudieri; Alessandro Giuseppe Fois; Clementina Cocuzza; Claire Hopkins; Giacomo De Riu; Andrea Fausto Piana
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  COVID-19 Viral Load in the Severity of and Recovery From Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction.

Authors:  Ryan H W Cho; Zion W H To; Zenon W C Yeung; Eugene Y K Tso; Kitty S C Fung; Sandy K Y Chau; Erica Y L Leung; Thomas S C Hui; Steven W C Tsang; K N Kung; Eudora Y D Chow; Victor Abdullah; Andrew van Hasselt; Michael C F Tong; Peter K M Ku
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.970

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review.

Authors:  Eleonora M C Trecca; Michele Cassano; Francesco Longo; Paolo Petrone; Cesare Miani; Thomas Hummel; Matteo Gelardi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.618

2.  Do the Successive Waves of SARS-CoV-2, Vaccination Status and Place of Infection Influence the Clinical Picture and COVID-19 Severity among Patients with Persistent Clinical Symptoms? The Retrospective Study of Patients from the STOP-COVID Registry of the PoLoCOV-Study.

Authors:  Michał Chudzik; Mateusz Babicki; Joanna Kapusta; Damian Kołat; Żaneta Kałuzińska; Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas; Piotr Jankowski
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  The Effects of Persistent Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunctions on Quality of Life in Long-COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Luigi Angelo Vaira; Claudia Gessa; Giovanna Deiana; Giovanni Salzano; Fabio Maglitto; Jerome R Lechien; Sven Saussez; Pasquale Piombino; Andrea Biglio; Federico Biglioli; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Claire Hopkins; Valentina Parma; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

4.  Is There Less Alteration of Smell Sensation in Patients With Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variant Infection?

Authors:  Juan Jose Rodriguez-Sevilla; Roberto Güerri-Fernádez; Bernat Bertran Recasens
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-12

5.  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related smell and taste impairment with widespread diffusion of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant.

Authors:  Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Giancarlo Tirelli; Pierluigi Meloni; Claire Hopkins; Giordano Madeddu; Andrea De Vito; Nicoletta Gardenal; Romina Valentinotti; Margherita Tofanelli; Daniele Borsetto; Jerome R Lechien; Jerry Polesel; Giacomo De Riu; Luigi Angelo Vaira
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.426

6.  Drug-Associated Parosmia: New Perspectives from the WHO Safety Database.

Authors:  Diane Merino; Alexandre Olivier Gérard; Susanne Thümmler; Nouha Ben Othman; Delphine Viard; Fanny Rocher; Alexandre Destere; Elise Katheryne Van Obberghen; Milou-Daniel Drici
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Anatomophysiological relationships and clinical considerations of taste and smell loss in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Rossi Vigliar; Karina Torres Pomini; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Rogerio Leone Buchaim
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2022-09-25

8.  Subjective and psychophysical olfactory and gustatory dysfunction among COVID-19 outpatients; short- and long-term results.

Authors:  Mads Mose Jensen; Kasper Daugaard Larsen; Anne-Sophie Homøe; Anders Lykkemark Simonsen; Elisabeth Arndal; Anders Koch; Grethe Badsberg Samuelsen; Xiaohui Chen Nielsen; Tobias Todsen; Preben Homøe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.