Literature DB >> 34812422

A Compressed Sensing Approach to Pooled RT-PCR Testing for COVID-19 Detection.

Sabyasachi Ghosh1, Rishi Agarwal1, Mohammad Ali Rehan1, Shreya Pathak1, Pratyush Agarwal1, Yash Gupta1, Sarthak Consul2, Nimay Gupta1, Ritesh Goenka1, Ajit Rajwade1, Manoj Gopalkrishnan2.   

Abstract

We propose 'Tapestry', a single-round pooled testing method with application to COVID-19 testing using quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) that can result in shorter testing time and conservation of reagents and testing kits, at clinically acceptable false positive or false negative rates. Tapestry combines ideas from compressed sensing and combinatorial group testing to create a new kind of algorithm that is very effective in deconvoluting pooled tests. Unlike Boolean group testing algorithms, the input is a quantitative readout from each test and the output is a list of viral loads for each sample relative to the pool with the highest viral load. For guaranteed recovery of [Formula: see text] infected samples out of [Formula: see text] being tested, Tapestry needs only [Formula: see text] tests with high probability, using random binary pooling matrices. However, we propose deterministic binary pooling matrices based on combinatorial design ideas of Kirkman Triple Systems, which balance between good reconstruction properties and matrix sparsity for ease of pooling while requiring fewer tests in practice. This enables large savings using Tapestry at low prevalence rates while maintaining viability at prevalence rates as high as 9.5%. Empirically we find that single-round Tapestry pooling improves over two-round Dorfman pooling by almost a factor of 2 in the number of tests required. We evaluate Tapestry in simulations with synthetic data obtained using a novel noise model for RT-PCR, and validate it in wet lab experiments with oligomers in quantitative RT-PCR assays. Lastly, we describe use-case scenarios for deployment. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Compressed sensing; Kirkman/Steiner triples; coronavirus; group testing; mutual coherence; pooled testing; sensing matrix design

Year:  2021        PMID: 34812422      PMCID: PMC8545028          DOI: 10.1109/OJSP.2021.3075913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Open J Signal Process        ISSN: 2644-1322


  13 in total

1.  Matrix and Steiner-triple-system smart pooling assays for high-performance transcription regulatory network mapping.

Authors:  Vanessa Vermeirssen; Bart Deplancke; M Inmaculada Barrasa; John S Reece-Hoyes; H Efsun Arda; Christian A Grove; Natalia J Martinez; Reynaldo Sequerra; Lynn Doucette-Stamm; Michael R Brent; Albertha J M Walhout
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Compressed Sensing of Multichannel EEG Signals: The Simultaneous Cosparsity and Low-Rank Optimization.

Authors:  Yipeng Liu; Maarten De Vos; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Compressed sensing for energy-efficient wireless telemonitoring of noninvasive fetal ECG via block sparse Bayesian learning.

Authors:  Zhilin Zhang; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Scott Makeig; Bhaskar D Rao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Rectified Gaussian Scale Mixtures and the Sparse Non-Negative Least Squares Problem.

Authors:  Alican Nalci; Igor Fedorov; Maher Al-Shoukairi; Thomas T Liu; Bhaskar D Rao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Signal Process       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.931

5.  Group Testing-Based Robust Algorithm for Diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Jin-Taek Seong
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-11

6.  Motion Compensated Dynamic MRI Reconstruction With Local Affine Optical Flow Estimation.

Authors:  Ningning Zhao; Daniel O'Connor; Adrian Basarab; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  Do superspreaders generate new superspreaders? A hypothesis to explain the propagation pattern of COVID-19.

Authors:  Pablo M Beldomenico
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Sparsity estimation from compressive projections via sparse random matrices.

Authors:  Chiara Ravazzi; Sophie Fosson; Tiziano Bianchi; Enrico Magli
Journal:  EURASIP J Adv Signal Process       Date:  2018-09-10

9.  Efficient high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 testing to detect asymptomatic carriers.

Authors:  Noam Shental; Shlomia Levy; Vered Wuvshet; Shosh Skorniakov; Bar Shalem; Aner Ottolenghi; Yariv Greenshpan; Rachel Steinberg; Avishay Edri; Roni Gillis; Michal Goldhirsh; Khen Moscovici; Sinai Sachren; Lilach M Friedman; Lior Nesher; Yonat Shemer-Avni; Angel Porgador; Tomer Hertz
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Rapid, large-scale, and effective detection of COVID-19 via non-adaptive testing.

Authors:  Matthias Täufer
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  4 in total

1.  Extreme Compressed Sensing of Poisson Rates from Multiple Measurements.

Authors:  Pavan K Kota; Daniel LeJeune; Rebekah A Drezek; Richard G Baraniuk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Signal Process       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Optimization in the Context of COVID-19 Prediction and Control: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jordan; Delia E Shin; Surbhi Leekha; Shapour Azarm
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.476

3.  Group testing via hypergraph factorization applied to COVID-19.

Authors:  David Hong; Rounak Dey; Xihong Lin; Brian Cleary; Edgar Dobriban
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Deep learning-based approach for detecting COVID-19 in chest X-rays.

Authors:  M Emin Sahin
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.