Literature DB >> 34810211

Molecular and Clinical Characterization of Postpartum-Associated Breast Cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase I-III, 1993-2013.

Sanah N Vohra1,2, Andrea Walens1,2, Alina M Hamilton3, Mark E Sherman4, Pepper Schedin5, Hazel B Nichols1,2, Katherine E Reeder-Hayes6, Andrew F Olshan1,2, Michael I Love7,8, Melissa A Troester1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancers in recently postpartum women may have worse outcomes, but studies examining tumor molecular features by pregnancy recency have shown conflicting results.
METHODS: This analysis used Carolina Breast Cancer Study data to examine clinical and molecular tumor features among women less than 50 years of age who were recently (≤10 years prior) or remotely (>10 years prior) postpartum, or nulliparous. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable models.
RESULTS: Recently postpartum women (N = 618) were more frequently lymph node-positive [POR (95% CI): 1.66 (1.26-2.19)], estrogen receptor (ER)-negative [1.37 (1.02-1.83)], and IHC-based triple negative [1.57 (1.00-2.47)] compared with nulliparous (N = 360) women. Some differences were identified between recent versus remotely postpartum; smaller tumor size [0.67 (0.52-0.86)], p53 wildtype [0.53 (0.36-0.77)], and non-basal-like phenotype [0.53 (0.33-0.84)] were more common among recently postpartum. Recently postpartum (vs. nulliparous) had significant enrichment for adaptive immunity, T cells, B cells, CD8 T cells, activated CD8 T cells/natural killer (NK) cells, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells and higher overall immune cell scores. These differences were attenuated in remotely (compared with recently) postpartum women.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a dominant effect of parity (vs. nulliparity) and a lesser effect of pregnancy recency on tumor molecular features, although tumor immune microenvironments were altered in association with pregnancy recency. IMPACT: Our study is unique in examining tumor immune microenvironment and RNA-based markers according to time since last childbirth. Future studies should examine the interplay between tumor features, postdiagnostic treatment, and outcomes among recently postpartum women. See related commentary by McDonald et al., p. 518. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34810211      PMCID: PMC8901538          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  48 in total

1.  Gene expression patterns in the human breast after pregnancy.

Authors:  Szilard Asztalos; Peter H Gann; Meghan K Hayes; Larisa Nonn; Craig A Beam; Yang Dai; Elizabeth L Wiley; Debra A Tonetti
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-02-23

2.  The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

Authors:  R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Molecular Phenotype of Breast Cancer According to Time Since Last Pregnancy in a Large Cohort of Young Women.

Authors:  Laura C Collins; Shari Gelber; Jonathan D Marotti; Sarah White; Kathryn Ruddy; Elena F Brachtel; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Pepper Schedin; Ellen Warner; Taylor Wensley; Rulla M Tamimi; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-29

4.  Breast cancer during pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes.

Authors:  Elyce Cardonick; Rebecca Dougherty; Generosa Grana; Dzhamlaa Gilmandyar; Sadia Ghaffar; Aniqa Usmani
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Prognosis of women with primary breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: results from an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Frédéric Amant; Gunter von Minckwitz; Sileny N Han; Marijke Bontenbal; Alistair E Ring; Jerzy Giermek; Hans Wildiers; Tanja Fehm; Sabine C Linn; Bettina Schlehe; Patrick Neven; Pieter J Westenend; Volkmar Müller; Kristel Van Calsteren; Brigitte Rack; Valentina Nekljudova; Nadia Harbeck; Michael Untch; Petronella O Witteveen; Kathrin Schwedler; Christoph Thomssen; Ben Van Calster; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Presentation, management and outcome of 32 patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a matched controlled study.

Authors:  Michael J Halaska; George Pentheroudakis; Pavel Strnad; Hana Stankusova; Jiri Chod; Helena Robova; Lubos Petruzelka; Lukas Rob; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 7.  Pregnancy-associated breast cancer and metastasis.

Authors:  Pepper Schedin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Racial differences in physical activity among breast cancer survivors: implications for breast cancer care.

Authors:  Brionna Y Hair; Sandi Hayes; Chiu-Kit Tse; Mary Beth Bell; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The definition of pregnancy-associated breast cancer is outdated and should no longer be used.

Authors:  Frédéric Amant; Hanne Lefrère; Virginia F Borges; Elyce Cardonick; Matteo Lambertini; Sibylle Loibl; Fedro Peccatori; Ann Partridge; Pepper Schedin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Parity-related molecular signatures and breast cancer subtypes by estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Melissa Rotunno; Xuezheng Sun; Jonine Figueroa; Mark E Sherman; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Paul Meltzer; Tyisha Williams; Sallie Smith Schneider; D Joseph Jerry; Xiaohong R Yang; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Breast cancer treatment patterns by age and time since last pregnancy in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase III.

Authors:  Sanah N Vohra; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Hazel B Nichols; Marc A Emerson; Michael I Love; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.624

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.