Literature DB >> 23610117

Prognosis of women with primary breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: results from an international collaborative study.

Frédéric Amant1, Gunter von Minckwitz, Sileny N Han, Marijke Bontenbal, Alistair E Ring, Jerzy Giermek, Hans Wildiers, Tanja Fehm, Sabine C Linn, Bettina Schlehe, Patrick Neven, Pieter J Westenend, Volkmar Müller, Kristel Van Calsteren, Brigitte Rack, Valentina Nekljudova, Nadia Harbeck, Michael Untch, Petronella O Witteveen, Kathrin Schwedler, Christoph Thomssen, Ben Van Calster, Sibylle Loibl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the prognosis of patients with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (BCP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, a multicentric registry of patients with BCP (from Cancer in Pregnancy, Leuven, Belgium, and GBG 29/BIG 02-03) compiled pro- and retrospectively between 2003 and 2011 was compared with patients who did not have associated pregnancies, using an age limit of 45 years. Patients with a diagnosis postpartum were excluded. The main analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) on exposure (pregnant or not), adjusting for age, stage, grade, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor 2 status, histology, type of chemotherapy, use of trastuzumab, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy.
RESULTS: The registry contained 447 women with BCP, mainly originating from Germany and Belgium, of whom 311 (69.6%) were eligible for analysis. The nonpregnant group consisted of 865 women. Median age was 33 years for the pregnant and 41 years for the nonpregnant patients. Median follow-up was 61 months. The hazard ratio of pregnancy was 1.34 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.91; P = .14) for DFS and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.93; P = .51) for OS. Cox regression estimated that the 5-year DFS rate for pregnant patients would have increased from 65% to 71% if these patients had not been pregnant. Likewise, the 5-year OS rate would have increased from 78% to 81%.
CONCLUSION: The results show similar OS for patients diagnosed with BCP compared with nonpregnant patients. This information is important when patients are counseled and supports the option to start treatment with continuation of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23610117     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.6335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  71 in total

1.  [Prognosis of pregnant women with primary breast cancer].

Authors:  W Harms
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Clinico-pathologic features, treatment and outcomes of breast cancer during pregnancy or the post-partum period.

Authors:  Ciara C O'Sullivan; Sheeba Irshad; Zheyu Wang; Zhuojun Tang; Christopher Umbricht; Gary L Rosner; Mindy S Christianson; Vered Stearns; Karen Lisa Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Outcome of patients with pregnancy during or after breast cancer: a review of the recent literature.

Authors:  J Raphael; M E Trudeau; K Chan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Malignancies associated with pregnancy: an analysis of 21 clinical cases.

Authors:  Y Liu; Y Liu; Y Wang; X Chen; H Chen; J Zhang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Efferocytosis produces a prometastatic landscape during postpartum mammary gland involution.

Authors:  Jamie C Stanford; Christian Young; Donna Hicks; Philip Owens; Andrew Williams; David B Vaught; Meghan M Morrison; Jiyeon Lim; Michelle Williams; Dana M Brantley-Sieders; Justin M Balko; Debra Tonetti; H Shelton Earp; Rebecca S Cook
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Placenta-breast cancer cell interactions promote cancer cell epithelial mesenchymal transition via TGFβ/JNK pathway.

Authors:  Gali Epstein Shochet; Shelly Tartakover-Matalon; Liat Drucker; Metsada Pasmanik-Chor; Meir Pomeranz; Ami Fishman; Michael Lishner
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  The Rodent Liver Undergoes Weaning-Induced Involution and Supports Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Erica T Goddard; Ryan C Hill; Travis Nemkov; Angelo D'Alessandro; Kirk C Hansen; Ori Maller; Solange Mongoue-Tchokote; Motomi Mori; Ann H Partridge; Virginia F Borges; Pepper Schedin
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 8.  Management of gynecological cancers during pregnancy.

Authors:  Sileny N Han; Magali Verheecke; Tineke Vandenbroucke; Mina Mhallem Gziri; Kristel Van Calsteren; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Metastasis as a systemic disease: molecular insights and clinical implications.

Authors:  Maša Alečković; Sandra S McAllister; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 10.680

10.  Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: evaluating maternal and foetal outcomes. A national study.

Authors:  Lisa Prior; Richard O'Dwyer; Abdul Rehman Farooq; Megan Greally; Cian Ward; Connor O'Leary; Razia Aslam; Waseem Darwish; Nada Ahmed; Elly Che Othman; Geoffrey Watson; Deirdre Kelly; Jack Gleeson; Lisa Kiely; Anees Hassan; Elaine M Walsh; David O'Reilly; Alfred Jones; Hannah Featherstone; Marvin Lim; Hazel Murray; Bryan T Hennessy; Lillian M Smyth; Gregory Leonard; Liam Grogan; Oscar Breathnach; Paula Calvert; Anne M Horgan; Linda Coate; Emmet J Jordan; Deirdre O'Mahony; Rajnish Gupta; Maccon M Keane; Jennifer Westrup; Karen Duffy; Miriam O'Connor; Patrick G Morris; M John Kennedy; Seamus O'Reilly; John McCaffrey; Catherine M Kelly; Desmond Carney; Giuseppe Gullo; John Crown; Michaela J Higgins; Paul M Walsh; Janice M Walshe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.