Maodie Wang1, Guanyu Zhang1, Petia Bobadova-Parvanova2, Kevin M Smith1, M Graça H Vicente1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, United States. 2. Department of Chemistry and Fermentation Sciences, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28607, United States.
Abstract
A series of α-amino acid-BODIPY derivatives were synthesized using commercially available N-Boc-l-amino acids, via boron functionalization under mild conditions. The mono-linear, mono-spiro, and di-amino acid-BODIPY derivatives were obtained using an excess of basic (histidine, lysine, and arginine), acidic (aspartic acid), polar (tyrosine, serine), and nonpolar (methionine) amino acid residues, in yields that ranged from 37 to 66%. The conformationally restricted mono-spiro- and di-amino acid-BODIPYs display strong absorptions in the visible spectral region with high molar extinction coefficients and significantly enhanced fluorescence quantum yields compared with the parent BF2-BODIPY. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity studies using the human HEp2 cell line show that both the presence of an N,O-bidentate spiro-ring and basic amino acids (His and Arg) increase cytotoxicity and enhance cellular uptake. Among the series of BODIPYs tested, the spiro-Arg- and spiro-His-BODIPYs were found to be the most cytotoxic (IC50 ∼ 22 μM), while the spiro-His-BODIPY was the most efficiently internalized, localizing preferentially in the cell lysosomes, ER, and mitochondria.
A series of α-amino acid-BODIPY derivatives were synthesized using commercially available N-Boc-l-amino acids, via boron functionalization under mild conditions. The mono-linear, mono-spiro, and di-amino acid-BODIPY derivatives were obtained using an excess of basic (histidine, lysine, and arginine), acidic (aspartic acid), polar (tyrosine, serine), and nonpolar (methionine) amino acid residues, in yields that ranged from 37 to 66%. The conformationally restricted mono-spiro- and di-amino acid-BODIPYs display strong absorptions in the visible spectral region with high molar extinction coefficients and significantly enhanced fluorescence quantum yields compared with the parent BF2-BODIPY. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity studies using the human HEp2 cell line show that both the presence of an N,O-bidentate spiro-ring and basic amino acids (His and Arg) increase cytotoxicity and enhance cellular uptake. Among the series of BODIPYs tested, the spiro-Arg- and spiro-His-BODIPYs were found to be the most cytotoxic (IC50 ∼ 22 μM), while the spiro-His-BODIPY was the most efficiently internalized, localizing preferentially in the cell lysosomes, ER, and mitochondria.
Boron dipyrrin or boron
dipyrromethene (BODIPY) dyes[1−6] are a class of boron-coordinated organic dyes that display a multitude
of highly desirable properties for various applications, including
good solubility in various solvents, large molar extinction coefficients,
high fluorescence quantum yields, relatively sharp absorption and
emission bands, low cytotoxicity, and structural tunability. With
these extraordinary properties, BODIPY dyes have been widely applied
in, for example, live-cell bioimaging,[7,8] photodynamic
therapy,[9,10] fluorescent sensing,[11] dye-sensitized solar cells,[12] and viscosity detection.[13]Several
methodologies for the post-functionalization of BODIPYs
have been developed over the past 2 decades.[12,14] The absorption and emission properties of BODIPY dyes can be fine-tuned
from ca. 400[15,16] to 750 nm through functionalization
reactions at the dipyrrin core.[14] In contrast,
modifications at the boron center generally have little or no effect
on the absorption and emission wavelengths, although the 3D structures
of the boron-functionalized BODIPY molecules often change significantly
upon the introduction of various groups at the boron atom. As a result,
the fluorescence quantum yields, laser efficiencies,[17] redox behavior, aqueous solubility, aggregation behavior,
and chemical stability[18−20] of BODIPYs can be conveniently fine-tuned for specific
applications. Nucleophilic substitution of one or both fluorides at
the boron position provides the possibility for application in positron
emission tomography–optical dual imaging by replacing the nonradiative
fluorine atom(s) by 18F.[21] Other
investigations of C-, O-, and N-BODIPYs[22−25] have led to enhanced materials
for applications in energy-transfer cassettes, fluorescence imaging,
and chiral recognition, among others. However, only a few reports
have explored bidentate B-spiro-BODIPYs.[26−28]Amino
acid–fluorophore conjugates are important building
blocks for the construction of bioactive fluorescent peptides and
proteins. The synthesis of BODIPY–amino acid conjugates has
been reported through C–H activation[29,30] and nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions.[31] We have previously reported the synthesis of N,O-bidentate spiro-Gly-BODIPY derivatives by direct
functionalization at the boron atom[32] and
extended this methodology to the preparation of near-IR aza-BODIPY-Gln
derivatives with potential application in photodynamic therapy.[33]In the past few decades, the biological
activities of boron-containing
compounds have been investigated for their antifungal, antibacterial,
antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antiprotozoal activities.[34−37] Notably, tavaborole (Kerydin), bortezomib (Velcade), and crisaborole
(Eucrisa) have been studied for the treatment of onychomycosis, multiple
myeloma, and atopic dermatitis, respectively.[38] Recently, in a study of NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors, Freeman et
al. reported that conformationally restricted analogues of a diarylboronic
acid motif and an oxazaborine ring possessed enhanced anti-inflammatory
activity.[39,40] Motivated by these studies, we set out to
synthesize and investigate a series of conformationally restricted
mono-spiro- and di-amino acid–BODIPY derivatives, bearing basic
(histidine, lysine, and arginine), acidic (aspartic acid), polar (tyrosine,
serine, and glutamine), and nonpolar (methionine) amino acid residues
for potential therapeutic and/or imaging applications. In addition,
a tripeptide (Gly)3–BODIPY derivative was also prepared,
showing that this methodology can be extended to the synthesis of
linker-free BODIPY–peptide derivatives.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
BODIPY 1 was synthesized through
a one-pot three-step method using 2,4-dimethylpyrrole and benzaldehyde
as the starting materials following a reported procedure.[41] The reaction of BODIPY 1 with commercially
available N-Boc l-amino acids, in the presence
of boron trichloride, has wide substrate scope, as shown in Scheme . α-Amino acids
bearing polar, nonpolar, cationic, and anionic side chains were used
to produce the mono-(A), N,O-bidentate spiro-(B), and di-(C) α-amino
acid BODIPY derivatives, in combined yields ranging from 37.3 to 65.9%.
While BODIPYs 2 (Asp), 6 (Met), and 9 (Lys) were obtained in moderate yields (>60%), BODIPYs 4 (His) and 5 (Tyr) were isolated in lower yields
(∼40%), possibly due to the poor solubility of the amino acids
in dichloromethane, as well as potential attack from the side chain
on the boron center. A two-step one-pot reaction, previously reported
using Gly[32] and Gln,[33] using two equivalents of boron trichloride and four equivalents
of l-amino acid in dry dichloromethane at room temperature,
was employed to favor the formation of conformationally restricted
products B and C. The tert-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc) electron-withdrawing group on the N-terminus
of the amino acid is necessary for decreasing the charge on boron,
therefore leading to stable N(sp3) conjugates. Some amino
acids bearing nucleophilic side chains also required the use of side
chain protecting group(s) to avoid byproduct formation via a side
chain attack on the boron atom. However, the widely used 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl
(Fmoc) and trifluoroacetyl protecting groups require harsh conditions
for deprotection,[42] which could also remove
the N-Boc group and/or cause BODIPY degradation.[20] Therefore, the carboxylbenzyl (Cbz) or benzyl
(Bn) groups were employed to protect the amino acids bearing nucleophilic
side chains. The advantages of these two protecting groups are as
follows: (1) the Cbz and Bn deprotection can be achieved under mild,
neutral conditions in quantitative yields; (2) this strategy eliminates
the formation of byproducts during the linker-free conjugation reaction;
(3) the generated toluene product from Cbz or Bn deprotection is easily
removed via vacuum evaporation; (4) Cbz or Bn protection can be applied
to a variety of O,N-nucleophilic
side chains; and (5) deprotection of the Cbz or Bn group does not
affect the Boc group on the nitrogen adjacent to boron. Catalytic
hydrogenation was performed to deprotect the Cbz or Bn side group(s)
of the BODIPY derivatives (Scheme ). The disappearance of the benzyl group (2H at ca.
5.0 ppm and 5H at ca. 7.5 ppm in CDCl3) could be clearly
seen by 1H NMR, as shown in the Supporting Information. This methodology was successfully applied to the
Asp-, Arg-, His-, and Ser-BODIPY conjugates, producing the corresponding a–c analogues. However, in the case of the Lys-BODIPY
derivatives 9A–C, upon the removal of the Cbz
protecting group, the products decomposed within a few hours at room
temperature, likely due to a nucleophilic attack of the amine upon
the boron atom. The Arg-BODIPY was also observed to slowly decompose
within 24 h; however, the His-BODIPY and all other derivatives bearing
acidic, polar, and nonpolar amino acid side chains are stable in both
solution and solid forms for at least 1 week at room temperature.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of α-Amino Acid–BODIPY Derivatives
Presumably, the reaction of BODIPY 1 in the presence
of boron trichloride proceeds via either the formation of a boronium
cation intermediate,[41] followed by the
nucleophilic attack of the amino acid carboxylate group on boron to
produce product A, or via the in situ formation of a
Cl2-BODIPY intermediate[43−45] leading to products B and C.The above methodology was extended
to the synthesis of BODIPY derivative 8 bearing an azide-functionalized
lysine residue suitable
for further conjugation with alkyne-containing compounds via click
chemistry. In addition, the tripeptide, N-Boc-GlyGlyGly
was also prepared using this methodology, as shown in Scheme , producing N,O-bidentate (Gly)3-BODIPY 11B as the major product in 26.0% yield, followed by 11C in 19.5% yield.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of (Gly)3–BODIPY Conjugates
The structures of all α-amino acid-BODIPY
conjugates were
confirmed by 1H, 13C, 11B-NMR, and
high-resolution mass spectroscopy (HRMS) (see the Supporting Information). In all cases, the 9H in the Boc protecting
groups can be seen at 1.4 ppm in the 1H NMR spectra in
the CDCl3 solvent. The characteristic methyl protons at
the 3,5-positions of the BODIPYs appear at ca. 2.2 ppm, while the
protons at the 1,7-positions are shifted upfield to 1.3 ppm due to
the shielding effect of the 8-phenyl ring. In the 1H NMR,
the protons at the α-carbon of the amino acid moiety are in
the range of 4.5–5.0 ppm in CDCl3, while the protons
at the β-carbons are in the range of 3.0–4.0 ppm, depending
on the side chain. Interestingly, the three products, A/a, B/b, and C/c, could be easily distinguished
by 11B-NMR as the spiro-(B/b) BODIPYs show
one singlet at ∼1.9 ppm, while the mono-(A/a)
BODIPYs show a doublet centered at ∼0.4 ppm and the di-(C/c) amino acid–BODIPYs show a singlet at ∼0.0
ppm.
Computational Studies
Our previous computational and
NMR studies[32] showed that the spiro-Gly-BODIPY
derivatives exist as two conformers (up and down) at room temperature,
depending on the orientation of the Boc group with respect to the
meso-phenyl, with the up-conformer being slightly more stable (ΔG < 3 kcal/mol). A similar trend is observed in the current
series of amino acid-BODIPY derivatives. All the calculated data shown
in Table S1 of the Supporting Information are for the up-conformers of the respective N,O-bidentate BODIPYs B. The mono-(A) and di-(C) amino acid–BODIPYs also exist in
the form of two conformers with small energy differences (ΔG < 5 kcal/mol). All data discussed below refer to the
more stable conformers.Analysis of the calculated relative
Gibbs energies of BODIPYs 2a–7a, 2b–7b, and 2c–7c in dichloromethane demonstrates that
the mono-substituted a is the most stable of the three
forms, while the conformationally restricted spiro-compound b and the di-substituted c have similar Gibbs
energies (see Table S1). The effect of
the side chain is small and the energy differences range between 14
and 19 kcal/mol. However, experimentally BODIPYs bearing amino acids
with strongly basic side chains, such as Arg and Lys, slowly decomposed
in solution over a 24 h period, while all others, including His-BODIPY,
were stable in solutions for over 1 week at room temperature. These
results are consistent with previous observations of BODIPY instability
under strongly basic conditions, such as in the presence of BuOK[46] or NH4OH.[18] The lower stability of the di-substituted
BODIPYs c compared with the mono-derivatives a is mostly due to entropy effects. On the other hand, the lower stability
of the N,O-bidentate BODIPYs b is probably due to their relatively weaker B–N(Boc)
bond compared with the B–O and B–F bonds. The B–N(Boc)
bonds range between 1.541 and 1.547 Å with 3b having
the longest bond of the series (see Table S1). The B–N and B–O bond lengths are similar in all
the investigated N,O-bidentate spiro-BODIPYs
and do not change significantly when different amino acids are introduced.
However, for all compounds in the series, the B–N(dipyrrin)
bonds in the spiro-BODIPYs b are consistently 0.01–0.02
Å longer than the ones in the mono a and di-substituted c BODIPYs. Our previous studies on the stability of BODIPYs[16] suggest that the spiro-conjugates will therefore
be slightly less stable than the di-substituted compounds. Furthermore,
our calculations show that the N,O-bidentate b compounds are consistently more polar than
the mono a and di-substituted c analogues
throughout the entire series, with 2b spiro-Asp being
the most polar of all (see Table S1). The
higher polarity of the N,O-bidentate
spiro-compounds explains their observed higher solubility in polar
solvents.
Spectroscopic Properties
The spectroscopic properties
of the selected conformationally restricted BODIPYs 2b,c, 3b,c, 4b,c, 5B,C, 6B,C, and 7b,c were measured and calculated in
acetonitrile. The experimental results are shown in Table , and the calculated parameters
are shown in the Supporting Information, Table S2. The bidentate spiro-(B) and the di-(C) amino acid-BODIPY derivatives have similar absorption and
fluorescence profiles, with maximum absorption and emission bands
centered at ca. 503 and 513 nm, respectively. These maximum absorption
and emission wavelengths are slightly red-shifted (4–5 nm)
compared with the parent BF2-BODIPY 1. This
shift is in agreement with the performed TD-DFT calculations (Table S2). The predicted red shift is 3–5
nm and is due to the slightly smaller HOMO–LUMO gap for the
α-amino acid–BODIPYs.
Table 1
Spectroscopic Properties
of α-Amino
Acid–BODIPYs in Acetonitrile at Room Temperaturea
BDP
λabs (nm)
log ε (M–1 cm–1)
λem (nm)
Φfb
Stokes’
shift (nm)
1
498
4.92
509
0.61
11
2b
503
4.56
512
0.99
9
2c
503
4.80
515
0.98
12
3b
503
4.58
513
0.83
10
3c
503
4.32
513
0.90
10
4b
503
4.83
514
0.92
11
4c
503
4.76
514
0.89
11
5B
503
4.71
513
0.82
10
5C
503
4.78
513
0.93
10
6B
502
4.85
513
0.92
11
7b
503
4.43
512
0.95
9
7c
502
4.81
513
0.94
11
According to our
TD-DFT M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p)
calculations in acetonitrile, the leading transition is HOMO →
LUMO. All calculated data can be found in Table S2, Supporting information.
Fluorescein (0.91 in 0.1 M NaOH)
was used as the standard.
According to our
TD-DFT M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p)
calculations in acetonitrile, the leading transition is HOMO →
LUMO. All calculated data can be found in Table S2, Supporting information.Fluorescein (0.91 in 0.1 M NaOH)
was used as the standard.The similar absorption and emission profiles observed for this
series of α-amino acid–BODIPYs are consistent with the
calculated similar HOMO–LUMO energies and gaps, as shown in Figure and the Supporting
Information, Figure S103. Figure represents the frontier orbitals
for the N,O-bidentate spiro and
di-substituted BODIPYs 6B and 6C. Both HOMO
and LUMO are localized on the BODIPY core with no significant contribution
from the amino acid nor the Boc protecting group. This is also consistent
with our previous findings[32] and is observed
for all other α-amino acid–BODIPYs in the series. The
performed TD-DFT calculations show that HOMO → LUMO is the
leading transition for all BODIPYs studied. Given the fact that the
forms and energies of these two orbitals are essentially independent
of the amino acid, it is not surprising that the maximum absorption
and emission wavelengths are very similar among the entire series.
Figure 1
Frontier
orbitals of BODIPYs 6B and 6C. Orbital energies
in eV. The frontier orbitals of all conformers
of all BODIPYs studied are given the Supporting Information (Figure S103).
Frontier
orbitals of BODIPYs 6B and 6C. Orbital energies
in eV. The frontier orbitals of all conformers
of all BODIPYs studied are given the Supporting Information (Figure S103).Remarkably, all newly synthesized α-amino acid–BODIPYs
display higher fluorescence quantum yields (Φ ∼ 0.9)
compared with the parent BF2–BODIPY 1 (Φ = 0.61), making them promising candidates for fluorescence
labeling of bioactive peptides. As also suggested by our previous
findings,[32] this result is probably due
to the increased rigidity around the boron center in these conformationally
restricted BODIPYs, which minimizes vibrations in-and-out of the dipyrrin
plane. Interestingly, the calculated oscillator strengths of all α-amino
acid–BODIPYs are smaller than that of parent BF2-BODIPY 1. However, the increased rigidity around the
boron center most likely reduces the nonradiative vibrational relaxation,
resulting in increased quantum yields.
Cellular Properties
Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxicity of the selected conformationally
restricted α-amino acid–BODIPY 2b,c, 3b,c, 4b,c, 5B, 6B,
and 7b were evaluated in human carcinoma HEp2 cells exposed
to the increasing concentrations of each BODIPY up to 200 μM;
the results are shown in the Supporting Information, Figures S104 and S105 and summarized in Table . Among the series (Figure S105), the spiro-Arg 3b and spiro-His 4b are the most toxic BODIPYs with IC50 values of 22 and
23 μM, respectively. These results indicate that both a spiro-5-membered
ring on boron (as often observed in boron-based therapeutics, such
as spiro-borates), and the presence of basic amino acids, such as
Arg and His, increase the cytotoxicity of the compound. Indeed, a
3–5-fold increase in cytotoxicity was observed for the spiro-BODIPYs
in comparison with the corresponding di-amino acid derivatives (Figure S105), possibly due to the more rigid N,O-bidentate spiro-ring structure. On
the other hand, basic amino acids such as Arg and His are capable
of interacting with negatively charged groups on cell membranes and
proteins, likely enhancing their cellular uptake and cytotoxicity.
Previous studies of histidine-containing peptides showed a 2–8-fold
increase in cytotoxicity as the solution pH decreased from 7.4 to
5.5,[47] suggesting that His-based compounds
can be useful therapeutics. All the other spiro-BODIPYs evaluated
bearing acidic (Asp), polar (Tyr), and nonpolar side chains showed
low cytotoxicity with calculated IC50 values >142 μM.
Table 2
Cytotoxicity of BODIPYs 2b,c, 3b,c, 4b,c, 5B, 6B, and 7b in
HEp2 Cells Using the Cell Titer Blue Assay
Compound
Cytotoxicity
(μM)
2b
58
2c
>200
3b
22
3c
104
4b
23
4c
68
5B
>200
6B
>200
7b
142
Cellular Uptake and Intracellular Localization
The
time-dependent cellular uptake of the most cytotoxic basic α-amino
acid BODIPYs 3b and 4b and of the parent
BODIPY 1 at a nontoxic concentration of 10 μM were
evaluated in human carcinoma HEp2 cells (Figure ). The basic amino acids Arg and His are
able to interact with phosphate groups on plasma membranes, which
enhances their cellular uptake. BODIPY 4b containing
His showed the highest uptake, about 2-fold that of the parent BODIPY 1 at times >2 h. The lower uptake observed for the Arg-BODIPY 3b, compared with 4b at all the times investigated,
might in part be a result of its relatively lower stability due to
the greater basicity of the guanidinium group. Although at times <8
h, BODIPY 3b showed a lower uptake than parent BODIPY 1, the positively charged guanidinium group in 3b favored its continuous uptake over time via interaction with the
negatively charged plasma membrane, thus leading to an enhanced uptake
at 24 h relative to BODIPY 1.[48,49]
Figure 2
Time-dependent
cellular uptake of BODIPYs 1 (purple), 3b (blue), and 4b (red) at 10 μM in human
HEp2 cells.
Time-dependent
cellular uptake of BODIPYs 1 (purple), 3b (blue), and 4b (red) at 10 μM in human
HEp2 cells.The sub-cellular localization
of BODIPYs 3b (Figure ) and 4b (Figure ) were also
investigated by fluorescence microscopy upon the exposure of the HEp2
cells to 10 μM of each BODIPY for 6 h. Overlay experiments using
the organelle-specific fluorescent probes LysoTracker deep red (lysosomes),
MitoTracker deep red (mitochondria), ER Tracker blue/white (ER), and
Hoechst 33342 (nuclei) were conducted to evaluate the preferential
sites of BODIPY localization. The results obtained are shown in Figures and 4. Both BODIPYs 3b and 4b are found
to localize in the ER, mitochondria, and lysosomes. We have previously
reported that BODIPY 1 accumulates preferentially in
the ER, Golgi, and lysosomes.[19] Our results
suggest that BODIPYs bearing positively charged amino acids (Arg,
His) also localize in mitochondria, which might account for their
observed higher cytotoxicity.
Figure 3
Sub-cellular localization of BODIPY 3b in HEp2 cells
at 10 μM after 6 h of incubation period. (a) Bright field; (b)
fluorescence of BODIPY 3b; (c) LysoTracker deep red;
(e) MitoTracker deep red; (g) ER Tracker blue/white; (i) Hoechst 33342;
and (d,f,h,j) overlays of tracers with BODIPY fluorescence. Scale
bar: 50 μm.
Figure 4
Sub-cellular localization
of BODIPY 4b in HEp2 cells
at 10 μM after 6 h incubation period. (a) Bright field; (b)
fluorescence of BODIPY 4b; (c) LysoTracker deep red;
(e) MitoTracker deep red; (g) ER Tracker blue/white; (i) Hoechst 33342;
and (d,f,h,j) overlays of tracers with BODIPY fluorescence. Scale
bar: 50 μm.
Sub-cellular localization of BODIPY 3b in HEp2 cells
at 10 μM after 6 h of incubation period. (a) Bright field; (b)
fluorescence of BODIPY 3b; (c) LysoTracker deep red;
(e) MitoTracker deep red; (g) ER Tracker blue/white; (i) Hoechst 33342;
and (d,f,h,j) overlays of tracers with BODIPY fluorescence. Scale
bar: 50 μm.Sub-cellular localization
of BODIPY 4b in HEp2 cells
at 10 μM after 6 h incubation period. (a) Bright field; (b)
fluorescence of BODIPY 4b; (c) LysoTracker deep red;
(e) MitoTracker deep red; (g) ER Tracker blue/white; (i) Hoechst 33342;
and (d,f,h,j) overlays of tracers with BODIPY fluorescence. Scale
bar: 50 μm.
Conclusions
A
series of conformationally restricted α-amino acid–BODIPYs,
bearing basic (His, Lys, and Arg), acidic (Asp), polar (Tyr, Ser),
and nonpolar (Met) side chains, were synthesized in moderate yields
from an in situ prepared BCl2–BODIPY and N(Boc)-l-amino acids, at room temperature. The
stability of these conformationally restricted BODIPYs depends on
the amino acid binding mode and the basicity of its side chain, with
the acidic, polar, and moderate basic (i.e., His) mono-linear amino
acid–BODIPY derivatives being the most stable. The calculated
relative Gibbs energies show that the N,O-bidentate spiro-BODIPYs are slightly less stable than the corresponding
di-amino acid derivatives due to the weaker B–N(Boc) bond compared
with the B–O bond.The conformationally restricted amino
acid–BODIPYs display
similar absorption and emission properties, slightly red-shifted relative
to the parent BF2–BODIPY due to their slightly smaller
HOMO–LUMO gap, and TD-DFT calculations suggest that HOMO →
LUMO is the leading transition. Furthermore, all conformationally
restricted amino acid–BODIPYs showed enhanced fluorescence
quantum yields (Φ ∼ 0.9) compared with the parent BF2–BODIPY (Φ = 0.61) due to the increased rigidity
around the boron center, which minimizes vibrations in-and-out of
the dipyrrin plane.Investigations in human HEp2 cells showed
that the N,O-bidentate spiro-Arg
and spiro-His are the most
cytotoxic (IC50 ∼ 22 μM), 3–5-fold
more toxic than their corresponding di-amino acid BODIPY derivatives.
The basic amino acid–BODIPYs are able to interact with negatively
charged groups on plasma cell membranes showing an enhanced cellular
uptake relative to the parent BF2–BODIPY at 24 h.
The preferential sites of intracellular localization for the most
cytotoxic basic amino acid–BODIPYs were found to be the ER,
mitochondria, and lysosomes, which might account for their observed
higher cytotoxicity.
Experimental Section
General
Commercial grade chemical reagents were purchased
from VWR or Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Liquid
column chromatography with silica gel (60 Å, 230–400 mesh)
or preparative TLC plates (60 Å, 20 × 20 cm2,
210–270 μm) were used for all the purifications. NMR
spectra were collected using a Bruker AV-400 or AV-500 spectrometer
at 300 K (operating at 400 or 500 MHz for 1H, 126 MHz for 13C NMR, and 128 MHz for 11B NMR) in CDCl3 (7.26 ppm for 1H and 77.0 ppm for 13C), CD2Cl2 (5.30 ppm for 1H and 53.4 ppm for 13C), CD3OD (3.35 ppm for 1H and 49.3
ppm for 13C), and BF3·OEt2 was
set as a reference (0.00 ppm) for 11B NMR. High-resolution
mass spectra were collected at the LSU Department of Chemistry Mass
Spectrometry Facility on an Agilent 6230-B ESI-TOF spectrometer in
the positive mode. UV–vis absorption spectra were collected
on a Varian Cary spectrophotometer. The fluorescence spectra were
obtained using a PerkinElmer LS55 spectrophotometer. Emission spectra
(λex = 470 nm) were recorded in quartz cells. Relative
fluorescence quantum yields (Φf) were calculated
using Fluorescein (Φf = 0.91 in 0.1 M NaOH) as the
standard for all compounds using the equationwhere ΦX and ΦST are the quantum yields of the sample
and standard, GradX and GradST are the gradients
from the plot of
the integrated fluorescence intensity versus absorbance, and η
represents the refractive index of the solvent. BODIPY 1 was prepared as previously reported in the literature.[41] Larger scale syntheses of A–C products have been previously reported.[33]
Computational Methods
The geometries
of all compounds
and complexes were optimized without symmetry constraints using the
B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level.[50−52] The solvent effects were taken
into account using the polarized continuum model.[53,54] The stationary points on the potential energy surface were confirmed
with frequency calculations. The UV–vis absorption data were
calculated using the TD-DFT method[55] All
calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 program package.[56]
Cell Culture
All
the cell culture media and reagents
were purchased from VWR and fisher scientific. The human carcinoma
HEp2 cells were purchased from ATCC and maintained in a MEM containing
5% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin antibiotic. The cells were then
sub-cultured and maintained twice weekly. Cell toxicity was evaluated
using the CellTiter-Blue (Promega) assay.The HEp2 cells were
plated at 7500–10 000 cells per well in a Costar 96-well
plate and allowed to grow for 24–48 h. BODIPY samples were
dissolved in 100% DMSO to prepare 32 mM stock solutions. Then, a 400
μM working solution was prepared for each sample. Through a
2-fold dilution procedure, HEp2 cells were exposed to concentrations
of 0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 μM solutions and incubated
for 24 h at 37 °C. The working solutions were then removed, and
the cells were washed with 1 × PBS buffer triple times. The cells
were exposed to the medium containing 20% CellTiterBlue and incubated
for 4 h at 37 °C. The viability of the cells is measured by reading
the fluorescence of the medium at 570/615 nm using a BMG FLUOstarOptima
microplate reader. The fluorescence signal of the untreated cells
in media only was normalized to 100%.
Cellular Uptake
Costar 96-well plates were prepared
as described above. Each BODIPY solution (10 μM) was added to
the cells and incubated for 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. At the end of
the incubation period, the BODIPY solution was removed, and the cells
were washed with 1 × PBS buffer triple times, followed by solubilizing
the cells with 0.25% Triton X-100 in 1 × PBS buffer. The compound
standard curve of each BODIPY was prepared by using BODIPY solutions
with concentrations of 0, 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM
in 1 × PBS buffer containing 0.25% X-100. The standard curve
of the cell number was prepared using 10 000, 20 000,
40 000, 60 000, 80 000, and 100 000 cells
per well and quantified by using a CyQuant Cell Proliferation Assay.
The BODIPY concentration in cells at the end of each incubation period
was determined using a BMG FLUOstar Optima microplate reader at the
excitation wavelength and emission wavelength of each BODIPY. The
time-dependent cellular uptake was evaluated as nM/cell.
Microscopy
The human HEp2 cells were incubated in a
35 mm tissue culture dish (CELLTREAT) and allowed to grow overnight.
The cells were exposed to each compound at a concentration of 10 μM
and incubated for 6 h (5% CO2, 37 °C). The following
organelle trackers (Invitrogen) were added to the cells: ER Tracker
Blue/White (1 mM), Hoechst 33342 (16 mM), MitoTracker deep red (1
μM), and LysoSensor deep red (1 μM). The cells were incubated
with each compound and trackers for half an hour, washed with PBS
solution three times, and followed by fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde
before imaging. A Leica DM6B upright microscope equipped with a 40
× water immersion objective, and DAPI, GFP, and Texas Red filter
cubes (Chroma Technologies) were used to acquire the images.
General Procedure for the Preparation of α-Amino Acid–BODIPY
Derivatives
Authors: Timothy J Jensen; M Graça H Vicente; Raymond Luguya; Jolanna Norton; Frank R Fronczek; Kevin M Smith Journal: J Photochem Photobiol B Date: 2010-05-23 Impact factor: 6.252
Authors: Martha Sibrian-Vazquez; Timothy J Jensen; Frank R Fronczek; Robert P Hammer; M Graça H Vicente Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Maodie Wang; Guanyu Zhang; Petia Bobadova-Parvanova; Ashley N Merriweather; Lilian Odom; David Barbosa; Frank R Fronczek; Kevin M Smith; M Graça H Vicente Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Krishna K Jagtap; Neelam Shivran; Soumyaditya Mula; Devidas B Naik; Sisir K Sarkar; Tulsi Mukherjee; Dilip K Maity; Alok K Ray Journal: Chemistry Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Alex G Baldwin; Victor S Tapia; Tessa Swanton; Claire S White; James A Beswick; David Brough; Sally Freeman Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.466