Literature DB >> 34805740

Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains.

Kevin Volf1,2, Liam Kelly1,2, Enrique García Bengoechea1,2, Bláthín Casey1,2, Anna Gobis3, Jeroen Lakerveld4, Joanna Zukowska3, Peter Gelius5, Sven Messing5, Sarah Forberger6, Catherine Woods1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown.  The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap.
Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration:  PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020). Copyright:
© 2022 Volf K et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evaluation; physical activity; policy; protocol; systematic review

Year:  2022        PMID: 34805740      PMCID: PMC8567685.4          DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13089.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HRB Open Res        ISSN: 2515-4826


  14 in total

1.  The Toronto Charter for Physical Activity: a global call for action.

Authors:  Fiona C Bull; Lise Gauvin; Adrian Bauman; Trevor Shilton; Harold W Kohl; Art Salmon
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support): overview and key principles.

Authors:  B Swinburn; G Sacks; S Vandevijvere; S Kumanyika; T Lobstein; B Neal; S Barquera; S Friel; C Hawkes; B Kelly; M L'abbé; A Lee; J Ma; J Macmullan; S Mohan; C Monteiro; M Rayner; D Sanders; W Snowdon; C Walker
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  NCD prevention: investments [corrected] that work for physical activity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health.

Authors:  Harold W Kohl; Cora Lynn Craig; Estelle Victoria Lambert; Shigeru Inoue; Jasem Ramadan Alkandari; Grit Leetongin; Sonja Kahlmeier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.

Authors:  Ding Ding; Kenny D Lawson; Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander; Eric A Finkelstein; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Willem van Mechelen; Michael Pratt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research.

Authors:  C J Caspersen; K E Powell; G M Christenson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Jeremy M Grimshaw; George A Wells; Maarten Boers; Neil Andersson; Candyce Hamel; Ashley C Porter; Peter Tugwell; David Moher; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mourad Ouzzani; Hossam Hammady; Zbys Fedorowicz; Ahmed Elmagarmid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.