Literature DB >> 34804888

A systematic review and meta-analysis: value of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of breast lesions.

Weifeng Lu1,2, Lili Tu2,3, Danxuan Xie2,4, Fu Yao2,4, Li Lin2,4, Ying Li2,4, Dexin Li2,5, Chengjin Mou2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, according to global statistics, breast cancer is the main disease affecting women. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) has become a frequently used method for breast cancer detection because of its accuracy, simplicity, and fewer complications.
METHODS: In PubMed, Medline, EMbase and Cochrane central register of controlled trials, the retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to March 2021, and the keywords included breast tumor, breast cancer-related diseases, breast lesions, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, sensitivity and specificity. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.
RESULTS: A total of 10 articles were included using a random-effects model that pooled the sensitivity, specificity, and other accuracy measures of VAB. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) characteristic curve was used to summarize the overall accuracy. The sensitivity range was 0.94 to 1.00 (mean, 0.981; 95% CI, 0.972-0.987) with a specificity range of 0.87-1.00 (mean, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.997-0.999). The preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was 93.84 (95% CI, 41.55-211.95), the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03-0.09), the sensitivity and specificity of χ2 were 37.10 (P=0.011) and 32.00 (P=0.043), respectively, while those of PLR, NLR, and duration of response (DOR) were 46.98 (P=0.001), 54.92 (P=0.001), and 43.49 (P=0.002), respectively. Differences were considerable. DISCUSSION: In this meta-analysis, a total of 10 articles were included. VAB is an accurate type of biopsy to detect female breast cancer. The results of the meta-analysis were stable, and VAB had high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (nearly 100%). 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; meta-analysis; ultrasonic; vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34804888      PMCID: PMC8575702          DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  35 in total

1.  Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome.

Authors:  F Burbank; S H Parker; T J Fogarty
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  O Olsen; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators.

Authors:  E D Pisano; L L Fajardo; J Tsimikas; N Sneige; W J Frable; C A Gatsonis; W P Evans; I Tocino; B J McNeil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy.

Authors:  L Liberman; D D Dershaw; J R Glassman; A F Abramson; E A Morris; L R LaTrenta; P P Rosen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Upright stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle biopsy of suspicious breast microcalcifications.

Authors:  L S J Sim; P L Kei
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.735

6.  Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.

Authors:  J Brett; J Austoker; G Ong
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1998-12

7.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial.

Authors:  E Lidbrink; J Elfving; J Frisell; E Jonsson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-03

9.  US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Hua Sun Kim; Min Jung Kim; Eun Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Ultrasound-Assisted Thoracic Paravertebral Block Reduces Intraoperative Opioid Requirement and Improves Analgesia after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Trial.

Authors:  Lijian Pei; Yidong Zhou; Gang Tan; Feng Mao; Dongsheng Yang; Jinghong Guan; Yan Lin; Xuejing Wang; Yanna Zhang; Xiaohui Zhang; Songjie Shen; Zhonghuang Xu; Qiang Sun; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy is an accurate type of biopsy to detect female breast cancer.

Authors:  Qiaoqiao Guo; Qingqing Fang; Zhijuan Zhou; Jiangfeng Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-04

2.  Adoption value of vacuum-assisted biopsy in diagnosis and treatment of breast lesions.

Authors:  Weifeng Lu; Lili Tu; Danxuan Xie; Fu Yao; Li Lin; Ying Li; Dexin Li; Chengjin Mou
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.