| Literature DB >> 34804453 |
Xibin Sun1, Yuhong Zhang2, Jiaxin Li1, Bin Zhang1, Qian Jia1.
Abstract
In order to explore the role of red blood cell distribution width in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, this paper applies map feature recognition technology to red blood cell distribution broadband and constructs an intelligent red blood cell distribution width diagnosis model. To extract the content-level features of the image safely and effectively, this paper introduces the mechanism of jitter quantization to extract the content-level features at the lowest frequency of the image. In addition, this article employs an experimental approach to investigate the function of red blood cell distribution width in the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly. Finally, this article establishes an experimental group and a control group and then performs a research study using real-life hospital case studies. According to the statistical findings, the red blood cell distribution width index may play a significant role in the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly in the case of severe bleeding.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34804453 PMCID: PMC8604600 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5216979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Block diagram of the realization process of the jitter quantization matrix.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of extracting content-level features.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of extracting features at all levels.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of the optical key.
Comparison of gastrointestinal bleeding volume.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 436.9 | 393.6 | 21 | 245.7 | 232.9 |
| 2 | 427.3 | 381.9 | 22 | 232.7 | 215.4 |
| 3 | 424.8 | 380.0 | 23 | 226.7 | 200.3 |
| 4 | 422.2 | 372.4 | 24 | 215.8 | 197.1 |
| 5 | 421.8 | 360.5 | 25 | 185.5 | 196.0 |
| 6 | 413.6 | 357.7 | 26 | 185.0 | 191.8 |
| 7 | 393.5 | 353.5 | 27 | 182.1 | 190.0 |
| 8 | 378.1 | 345.9 | 28 | 174.7 | 182.1 |
| 9 | 354.3 | 338.6 | 29 | 173.9 | 174.0 |
| 10 | 344.0 | 337.6 | 30 | 150.6 | 161.9 |
| 11 | 343.4 | 333.9 | 31 | 150.2 | 158.9 |
| 12 | 312.8 | 310.2 | 32 | 146.7 | 158.0 |
| 13 | 290.6 | 296.9 | 33 | 140.5 | 141.5 |
| 14 | 289.7 | 290.3 | 34 | 133.1 | 115.4 |
| 15 | 282.5 | 289.4 | 35 | 132.5 | 112.2 |
| 16 | 280.5 | 280.9 | 36 | 120.6 | 95.2 |
| 17 | 276.7 | 268.8 | 37 | 120.3 | 79.3 |
| 18 | 273.1 | 255.8 | 38 | 103.3 | 77.2 |
| 19 | 269.0 | 250.8 | 39 | 101.4 | 73.4 |
| 20 | 263.2 | 240.7 | 40 | 100.1 | 50.8 |
Figure 5Line chart of gastrointestinal bleeding volume.
Recovery situation of test group and control group.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95.8 | 89.4 | 21 | 83.3 | 93.5 |
| 2 | 89.4 | 91.9 | 22 | 88.4 | 94.5 |
| 3 | 82.9 | 94.8 | 23 | 74.6 | 92.2 |
| 4 | 94.4 | 93.1 | 24 | 84.6 | 89.9 |
| 5 | 82.5 | 93.6 | 25 | 84.9 | 89.4 |
| 6 | 72.8 | 96.8 | 26 | 85.4 | 92.6 |
| 7 | 93.6 | 91.1 | 27 | 85.3 | 95.5 |
| 8 | 74.0 | 96.0 | 28 | 78.8 | 95.5 |
| 9 | 87.4 | 92.2 | 29 | 75.8 | 91.2 |
| 10 | 84.8 | 91.8 | 30 | 72.6 | 96.9 |
| 11 | 78.6 | 92.8 | 31 | 82.4 | 92.4 |
| 12 | 80.1 | 92.6 | 32 | 78.0 | 92.5 |
| 13 | 96.8 | 95.5 | 33 | 87.5 | 89.3 |
| 14 | 84.6 | 93.7 | 34 | 75.1 | 92.5 |
| 15 | 88.6 | 89.4 | 35 | 90.4 | 89.6 |
| 16 | 77.0 | 92.6 | 36 | 83.6 | 92.1 |
| 17 | 94.7 | 92.2 | 37 | 96.3 | 96.1 |
| 18 | 89.4 | 93.9 | 38 | 86.4 | 93.2 |
| 19 | 94.5 | 94.6 | 39 | 72.2 | 94.8 |
| 20 | 74.9 | 91.3 | 40 | 92.8 | 92.1 |
Figure 6Line chart of the recovery situation of the test group and the control group.