Literature DB >> 31634917

Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.

Alan N Barkun1, Majid Almadi2, Ernst J Kuipers3, Loren Laine4, Joseph Sung5, Frances Tse6, Grigorios I Leontiadis6, Neena S Abraham7, Xavier Calvet8, Francis K L Chan5, James Douketis6, Robert Enns9, Ian M Gralnek10, Vipul Jairath11, Dennis Jensen12, James Lau5, Gregory Y H Lip13, Romaric Loffroy14, Fauze Maluf-Filho15, Andrew C Meltzer16, Nageshwar Reddy17, John R Saltzman18, John K Marshall6, Marc Bardou14.   

Abstract

Description: This update of the 2010 International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (UGIB) refines previous important statements and presents new clinically relevant recommendations.
Methods: An international multidisciplinary group of experts developed the recommendations. Data sources included evidence summarized in previous recommendations, as well as systematic reviews and trials identified from a series of literature searches of several electronic bibliographic databases from inception to April 2018. Using an iterative process, group members formulated key questions. Two methodologists prepared evidence profiles and assessed quality (certainty) of evidence relevant to the key questions according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Group members reviewed the evidence profiles and, using a consensus process, voted on recommendations and determined the strength of recommendations as strong or conditional. Recommendations: Preendoscopic management: The group suggests using a Glasgow Blatchford score of 1 or less to identify patients at very low risk for rebleeding, who may not require hospitalization. In patients without cardiovascular disease, the suggested hemoglobin threshold for blood transfusion is less than 80 g/L, with a higher threshold for those with cardiovascular disease. Endoscopic management: The group suggests that patients with acute UGIB undergo endoscopy within 24 hours of presentation. Thermocoagulation and sclerosant injection are recommended, and clips are suggested, for endoscopic therapy in patients with high-risk stigmata. Use of TC-325 (hemostatic powder) was suggested as temporizing therapy, but not as sole treatment, in patients with actively bleeding ulcers. Pharmacologic management: The group recommends that patients with bleeding ulcers with high-risk stigmata who have had successful endoscopic therapy receive high-dose proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (intravenous loading dose followed by continuous infusion) for 3 days. For these high-risk patients, continued oral PPI therapy is suggested twice daily through 14 days, then once daily for a total duration that depends on the nature of the bleeding lesion. Secondary prophylaxis: The group suggests PPI therapy for patients with previous ulcer bleeding who require antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy for cardiovascular prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31634917      PMCID: PMC7233308          DOI: 10.7326/M19-1795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  115 in total

1.  Omeprazole affects clopidogrel efficacy but not ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Yi-hong Ren; Ming Zhao; Yun-dai Chen; Lian Chen; Hong-bin Liu; Yu Wang; Zhi-jun Sun; Jin-song Chen; Ting-ting Huang; Yu-song Guo; Yong-jin Xie; Chun-ya Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Prevention of recurrent idiopathic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding: a double-blind, randomised trial.

Authors:  Grace L H Wong; Louis H S Lau; Jessica Y L Ching; Yee-Kit Tse; Rachel H Y Ling; Vincent W S Wong; Philip W Y Chiu; James Y W Lau; Francis K L Chan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Felipe Baracat; Eduardo Moura; Wanderley Bernardo; Leonardo Zorron Pu; Ernesto Mendonça; Diogo Moura; Renato Baracat; Edson Ide
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.

Authors:  Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann; Jenny Moberg; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Elie A Akl; Marina Davoli; Shaun Treweek; Reem A Mustafa; Gabriel Rada; Sarah Rosenbaum; Angela Morelli; Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Doppler Endoscopic Probe Monitoring of Blood Flow Improves Risk Stratification and Outcomes of Patients With Severe Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Dennis M Jensen; Thomas O G Kovacs; Gordon V Ohning; Kevin Ghassemi; Gustavo A Machicado; Gareth S Dulai; Alireza Sedarat; Rome Jutabha; Jeffrey Gornbein
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.

Authors:  A J Stanley; D Ashley; H R Dalton; C Mowat; D R Gaya; E Thompson; U Warshow; M Groome; A Cahill; G Benson; O Blatchford; W Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Could application of epinephrine improve hemostatic efficacy of hemoclips for bleeding peptic ulcers? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Sasa Grgov; Biljana Radovanović-Dinić; Tomislav Tasić
Journal:  Vojnosanit Pregl       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.168

8.  Efficacy and safety of a 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in patients on vitamin K antagonists presenting with major bleeding: a randomized, plasma-controlled, phase IIIb study.

Authors:  Ravi Sarode; Truman J Milling; Majed A Refaai; Antoinette Mangione; Astrid Schneider; Billie L Durn; Joshua N Goldstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Marc Bardou; John K Marshall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Endoscopic Doppler ultrasound versus endoscopic stigmata-directed management of acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a multimodel cost analysis.

Authors:  Victor K Chen; Richard C K Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 3.487

View more
  68 in total

1.  Hypocalcemia is associated with adverse clinical course in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alexander Korytny; Amir Klein; Erez Marcusohn; Yaacov Freund; Ami Neuberger; Aeyal Raz; Asaf Miller; Danny Epstein
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  The Clinical Impact of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Susana Maia; Daniela Falcão; Joana Silva; Isabel Pedroto
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  How Can Patient's Risk Dictate the Timing of Endoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?

Authors:  Marta Freitas; Vítor Macedo Silva; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Carla Marinho; José Cotter
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-24

4.  Barriers to Guideline-Based Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors to Prevent Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Jacob E Kurlander; Danielle Helminski; Alex N Kokaly; Caroline R Richardson; Raymond De Vries; Sameer D Saini; Sarah L Krein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: journal club review.

Authors:  Andrew Guy; Kate Eppler; Jessica Moe
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.410

6.  Twitter debate: controversies in management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Carly Lamb; James Maurice; Adrian J Stanley
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-05

7.  Comparing the Performance of the ABC, AIMS65, GBS, and pRS Scores in Predicting 90-day Mortality Or Rebleeding Among Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Xiaoming Zhang; Joseph Harold Walline; Xuezhong Yu; Huadong Zhu
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2021-06-16

8.  Pros and Cons of Performing Early Endoscopy in Geriatric Patients Admitted with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Analysis of the US National Inpatient Database.

Authors:  Mohammed El-Dallal; Trent J Walradt; Daniel J Stein; Usah Khrucharoen; Joseph D Feuerstein
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: proposed study outcomes for new randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Dennis M Jensen; Alan Barkun; David Cave; Ian M Gralnek; Rome Jutabha; Loren Laine; James Y W Lau; John R Saltzman; Roy Soetikno; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 9.524

10.  Prediction model of emergency mortality risk in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lan Chen; Han Zheng; Saibin Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.