Literature DB >> 21690262

fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation?

Jonas Larsson1, Andrew T Smith.   

Abstract

Measurements of repetition suppression with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI adaptation) have been used widely to probe neuronal population response properties in human cerebral cortex. fMRI adaptation techniques assume that fMRI repetition suppression reflects neuronal adaptation, an assumption that has been challenged on the basis of evidence that repetition-related response changes may reflect unrelated factors, such as attention and stimulus expectation. Specifically, Summerfield et al. (Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci. 11:1004-1006) reported that the relative frequency of stimulus repetitions and non-repetitions influenced the magnitude of repetition suppression in the fusiform face area, suggesting that stimulus expectation accounted for most of the effect of repetition. We confirm that stimulus expectation can significantly influence fMRI repetition suppression throughout visual cortex and show that it occurs with long as well as short adaptation durations. However, the effect was attention dependent: When attention was diverted away from the stimuli, the effects of stimulus expectation completely disappeared. Nonetheless, robust and significant repetition suppression was still evident. These results suggest that fMRI repetition suppression reflects a combination of neuronal adaptation and attention-dependent expectation effects that can be experimentally dissociated. This implies that with an appropriate experimental design, fMRI adaptation can provide valid measures of neuronal adaptation and hence response specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21690262      PMCID: PMC3278317          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  55 in total

1.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Scott O Murray; Sheng He
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm.

Authors:  Hiromasa Sawamura; Guy A Orban; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Etienne Koechlin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  fMRI and its interpretations: an illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT.

Authors:  Andreas Bartels; Nikos K Logothetis; Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent.

Authors:  Bram-Ernst Verhoef; Greet Kayaert; Edit Franko; Joris Vangeneugden; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  FMRI adaptation reveals separate mechanisms for first-order and second-order motion.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ashida; Angelika Lingnau; Matthew B Wall; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Visual field maps in human cortex.

Authors:  Brian A Wandell; Serge O Dumoulin; Alyssa A Brewer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Yoram S Bonneh; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  fMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Trevor T-J Chong; Ross Cunnington; Mark A Williams; Nancy Kanwisher; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Effect of spatial attention on stimulus-specific haemodynamic repetition effects.

Authors:  R N Henson; E Mouchlianitis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  91 in total

1.  Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.

Authors:  Beatriz R Sarmiento; Pawel J Matusz; Daniel Sanabria; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Action-Based Learning of Multistate Objects in the Medial Temporal Lobe.

Authors:  Nicholas C Hindy; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Adaptation to heading direction dissociates the roles of human MST and V6 in the processing of optic flow.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Lara Hemsworth; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Attention sharpens the distinction between expected and unexpected percepts in the visual brain.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Brain regions that show repetition suppression and enhancement: A meta-analysis of 137 neuroimaging experiments.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Predictions Shape Confidence in Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus.

Authors:  Maxine T Sherman; Anil K Seth; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex.

Authors:  Kasper Vinken; Hans P Op de Beeck; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Affective interoceptive inference: Evidence from heart-beat evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  Antje Gentsch; Alejandra Sel; Amanda C Marshall; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Contributions of the parietal cortex to increased efficiency of planning-based action selection.

Authors:  Jennifer Randerath; Kenneth F Valyear; Benjamin A Philip; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.