Confidence of UK Ophthalmology Registrars in Managing Posterior Capsular Rupture: Results from a National Trainee Survey.

INTRODUCTION: To establish the level of confidence amongst UK ophthalmology specialist registrars (residents) in managing posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery.
METHODS: An online nine-item questionnaire was distributed to all registrars, recruited nationwide via regional representatives. Data collected included stage of training, number of completed cataract operations, cumulative PCR rate, number of PCRs independently managed, understanding of vitrectomy settings and fluidic parameters and access to simulation. Respondents self-evaluated their confidence in managing PCR with vitreous loss.
RESULTS: Complete responses were obtained from 248 registrars (35% response rate). Mean number of phacoemulsification procedures performed was 386. For senior registrars (OST 6-7), 35 out of 70 (50%) felt confident to manage PCR independently and 55 out of 70 (78.6%) were either quite confident or very confident at deciding when to implant an intraocular lens during PCR management. Lower confidence levels were noted for junior trainees (OST 1-2). Over 65% of survey respondents had access to relevant simulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results represent the largest UK survey analysing the confidence of PCR management amongst registrars. Confidence improves with duration of training and increased exposure to management of PCR. However, 50% of senior registrars still lacked confidence to independently manage PCR and vitreous loss. A specific competency-based framework, potentially using a simulator or simulating a PCR event, incorporated into the curriculum may be desirable.

Key Summary Points

Introduction

Phacoemulsification for cataract surgery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the National Health Service (NHS), with approximately 350,000 operations per year [1]. It is estimated that over 30% of persons in the United Kingdom (UK), aged 65 years and over, will have visually significant cataracts in one or both eyes [2].

Posterior capsule rupture (PCR) is widely regarded as the benchmark complication to judge surgical quality of cataract surgery [3]. Following PCR, there is a significantly increased risk of endophthalmitis (8-fold), retinal detachment (42-fold) and of visual loss (5.6-fold) [4]. In a study by Ti et al. cases complicated by PCR and dropped nucleus had significantly worse visual outcomes than those complicated by PCR alone (83.1% vs 94.8% achieving BCVA 20/40; P < 0.001) [5]. One of the most significant risk factors for PCR is surgeon experience, with junior registrars (residents) having an adjusted odds ratio of 3.73 in comparison to consultants [6]. It is therefore important for all ophthalmic surgeons in training to become proficient in the overall management of PCR (with or without vitreous loss) to optimise patient outcomes.

Ophthalmic specialist training (OST) in the UK is 7 years in duration and registrars must complete a minimum of 350 phacoemulsification cases in order to be eligible for ‘Certification of Completion of Training’ (CCT) [7]. Until recently, cataract surgical training in the UK was largely experiential in nature, whereby the registrar performed steps of phacoemulsification through a sequence of observation and hands-on experience. While PCR occurrence is relatively common in the early stages of training, opportunities for registrars to gain hands-on experience are variable, often with the supervising surgeon taking over. Although the risk of intraoperative complications reduces as a registrar progresses in training [8], it has been suspected that experience with independently managing PCR is still limited by the end of OST. Turnbull and Lash conducted a regional survey in 2016, where only 18.2% of registrars felt confident in managing PCR and vitreous loss without senior support [9]. We designed a survey to investigate this question on a nationwide level and assess the subjective confidence of UK registrars in managing PCR, with reference to their stage of training and surgical experience.

Methods

A nine-stem anonymous questionnaire (Table 1) was distributed via an online web-based platform (SurveyMonkey, San Mateo, California, USA) to all UK registrars in years 1–7. Prior to survey distribution, a Health Research Authority decision tool deemed ethical approval was not required [10]. The survey was distributed via survey leads appointed by the South West Ophthalmic Research Matrix and the London Ophthalmology Clinical Trial Network, using methodology developed from a registrar-led clinician practice survey [11]. Survey leads ensured regional dissemination using a combination of electronic communication. Reminders were sent through regional training programme directors.

Table 1

Survey summary (as used in the SurveyMonkey online version)

	Answer
What is your current year of training?	Free text
What deanery are you presently training in?	Free text
How many cataract surgeries have you completed in total?	Free text
How many cases of PCR have you personally managed (with or without supervision)?	Free text
How confident are you with understanding the theoretical principles of managing PCR and vitreous loss?	Not confident as my understanding is limited	Understand the theoretical principles but not confident enough to attempt management under supervision/on my own	Understand the theoretical principles and would attempt management but only under supervision	Understand the theoretical principles and confident to manage PCR and vitreous loss by myself
With PCR and vitreous loss, how confident do you feel with deciding what vitrectomy settings and fluidic parameters are required?	Not confident at all	Not particularly confident—would require senior support	Quite confident—can manage with minimal senior input	Very confident
With PCR and vitreous loss, how confident do you feel with deciding when, where and how to implant an intraocular lens?	Not confident at all	Not particularly confident—would require senior support	Quite confident—can manage with minimal senior input	Very confident
Overall, how confident do you feel in managing PCR with vitreous loss?	Not confident at all	Not particularly confident—would require senior support	Quite confident—can manage with minimal senior input	Very confident
Do you have access to any simulated training for performing anterior vitrectomy (either in your hospital or deanery)?	Yes		No

This article does not contain any new studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

The survey was voluntary and only one response per registrar was permitted. Registrars who had not completed at least five phacoemulsification procedures were excluded from the final analysis. The SurveyMonkey online calculator algorithm estimated the minimum required sample size from a total population of 706 registrars at the time (with a confidence level of 95% and a margin error of 10%) to be 85. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 (IBM SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For the purposes of this survey, junior grade registrars were defined to be OST 1–2, middle grade registrars at OST 3–5 and senior grade registrars at OST 6–7. Histogram plots were used to determine normality of the data. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test was used to assess for any relation between the numbers of phacoemulsification procedures performed and numbers of PCR cases managed.

Results

A total of 250 responses were initially received, of which two responses were excluded. Therefore 248 completed surveys responses were analysed; 247 (99.6%) were completed by registrars in General Medical Council accredited training programmes and one response in a Locum Appointment for Training (LAT) post. The survey accumulated the views of approximately 35% of OST population in the UK at the time of running. Responses were received from all training deaneries. The responses captured a relatively variable spread amongst training years 1–7, the highest response rates being from those in year 4 and 5 of OST (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Completed survey responses by individual OST training level

The mean and median number of phacoemulsification procedures achieved was higher than the minimum numbers requirement for CCT from years 5 to 7 (Table 2). Two OST 7 registrars had less than the required number of phacoemulsification procedures for CCT at the point of data entry. The lowest numbers were seen at OST 1 (6 cases) and the highest at OST 7 (1602 cases).

Table 2

Mean number of independent phacoemulsification procedures performed and posterior capsular ruptures (PCR) managed as the registrar operating with or without assistance per training year

Year	Survey respondents	Mean number of procedures	Median number of procedures	Range of procedures	Total number of PCR recorded	Mean number PCR managed	Median number of PCR managed	Range of PCR managed
OST1	25	45	30	6–208	1	0	0	0–1
OST2	28	140.5	140	42–225	2	0	0	0–1
OST3	34	257	250	64–551	41	1	0	0–5
OST4	42	322	331	146–450	54	1	1	0–5
OST5	49	454.3	430	200–800	116	2	2	0–15
OST6	38	595.7	517	350–1298	120	3	2	0–13
OST7	32	724.7	654	300–1602	152	5	4	0–20

By year 4 most responders had some experience managing PCR and by year 7 the median was 4 cases (Table 2). The registrar who managed a single PCR had the lowest phacoemulsification procedures of 6 at OST 1 level. The registrar with the highest number of phacoemulsification procedures (1602) had managed 5 PCR cases at OST 7 level. The most number of PCRs managed (20 cases) was by a registrar at OST 7 level with 1400 phacoemulsification procedures. The data was found to be non-normally distributed. A moderately positive correlation was observed that as registrars performed more phacoemulsification procedures, more experience in PCR management was gained by the number of cases they managed with this complication (r = 0.736, p =  < 0.01).

Theoretical Principles of Managing PCR and Vitreous Loss

Figure 2 shows the survey results of trainee confidence in their understanding of the theoretical principles of PCR management. Up to 47.6% of registrars surveyed across all training years reported that they understood the theory behind management but would only attempt this with senior support. Only 31.1% felt subjectively comfortable with performing this independently.

Fig. 2

Confidence of registrars in understanding the theoretical principles of managing PCR and vitreous loss

Subgroup analysis revealed 64.8% of registrars at OST 3–5 level (81 out of 125) understanding theory and attempting management under supervision. At OST 6–7 level, 72.8% (51 out of 70) subjectively felt able to understand theoretical aspects and attempt management independently.

Deciding Anterior Vitrectomy Settings and Fluidic Parameters Required

Despite a perceived confidence amongst more experienced registrars in theoretical understanding of PCR and vitreous loss, far less confidence was expressed overall across training years for deciding anterior vitrectomy settings and fluidic parameters (Fig. 3). Of all survey responders, 7.3% rated themselves as very confident, followed by 36.3% as confident enough to require minimal senior input and 34.3% as not confident and requiring senior assistance. Subgroup analysis showed that only 18 out of 70 registrars (25.7%) at OST 6–7 level would regard themselves as very confident in this regard. Around 61.4% (43 out of 70) of registrars at the same level felt confident with minimal senior input. Registrars at OST 3–5 level were found to the most likely to place themselves into the category of subjectively not feeling confident and requiring senior support (61 out of 125).

Fig. 3

Confidence of registrars in deciding anterior vitrectomy settings and fluidic parameters required

Confidence in Deciding When, Where and How to Implant an Intraocular Lens (IOL) in PCR and Vitreous Loss

Registrars were assessed in their how they subjectively rated their surgical skills in implanting an IOL in the sulcus with capsular support or deciding to leave an eye aphakic for IOL implantation as a secondary procedure (Fig. 4). Across all training grades, the majority of survey responders rated themselves as not confident and requiring senior support (43.6%). For registrars at OST 6–7 level, 55 out of 70 (78.6%) were either quite “confident” or “very confident” at deciding when to implant an IOL during PCR management. Out of the 125 registrars at OST 3–5 level, 66 were not very confident (48.8%) while 55 rated themselves confident (44%).

Fig. 4

Confidence of registrars in deciding when, where and how to implant an intraocular lens with vitreous loss

Overall Confidence of Registrars in Managing PCR with Vitreous Loss

Table 3 shows the overall confidence for each OST level in managing PCR with vitreous loss and how readily registrars would seek senior input if required to do so. Over 50% (35 out of 70) of registrars at OST 6–7 level were confident to manage PCR without senior support. At OST 3–5 level, 38.4% (48 out of 125) required senior assistance on stand-by and 41% (52 out of 125) required senior assistance at the microscope. The majority at OST 1–2 level (67.9%) would need a supervisor to take over.

Table 3

Individual OST level response to overall confidence in managing PCR with vitreous loss

	Would need supervisor/nearby senior to take over	Could manage only with senior assistance (scrubbed at microscope)	Could manage but with senior assistance on stand-by (unscrubbed in theatre/coffee room/office)	Could complete case without senior support
OST1	95.8% (23)	4.1% (1)	0 (0)	0 (0)
OST2	46.4% (13)	53.6% (15)	0 (0)	0 (0)
OST3	17.6% (6)	58.8% (20)	23.5% (8)	0 (0)
OST4	14.3% (6)	47.6% (20)	33.3% (14)	4.8% (2)
OST5	8.2% (4)	24.5% (12)	53.1% (26)	14.3% (7)
OST6	2.6% (1)	10.5% (4)	55.3% (21)	31.6% (12)
OST7	0 (0)	0 (0)	28.1% (9)	71.9% (23)

Access to Relevant Simulation

A total of 65% of responders reported having access to some form of simulation relevant to anterior vitrectomy in their deanery.

Discussion

This is the first national training survey to be circulated through UK ophthalmology trainee research network collaborations. It has a higher response rate in comparison to one conducted in the USA (4.4%) [12] whilst being comparable to a Canadian survey (40%) [13]. Although our survey has a lower response rate in comparison to a recent sub-Saharan African study (52%), the latter comprised 124 responders [14]. The only other UK-based surveys are either regional [9] or have generically inquired on this issue with a lower response rate nationally [15].

Early introduction to phacoemulsification training has been shown to generally reduce intraoperative complications in registrar-performed operations [16]. Phacoemulsification training occurs from OST 1 and a minimum of 50 completed cases are expected to be achieved by the end of OST 2. It is generally accepted that repeated and deliberate practice (with regular reinforcement) is required to develop surgical expertise [17]. Concerns have been expressed about the impact of the European Working Time Directive leading to reduced working hours for surgeons, along with the emergence of ‘Independent Surgical Treatment Centres’ [18, 19]. These high volume cataract surgery centres usually target less complex cases. Surgically challenging cases carrying a higher risk of PCR, with or without vitreous loss, are inevitably reserved for senior surgeons in an NHS setting. These factors have detrimental consequences for surgical training, with reduced registrar exposure and confidence levels in performing more complex cataract surgery [20]. While it has been suggested that immediate management by vitreoretinal specialists optimises outcomes in cases complicated by PCR [21], this is both impractical from a logistical perspective and fails to take into account that not all ophthalmology departments have an on-site vitreoretinal service. Jamison et al. assessed the real-term costs of PCR to NHS ophthalmology departments (in terms of additional surgical equipment utilised and outpatient visits) and estimated this to be between £1178.20 and £2124.67 [22]. An additional concern is the medicolegal aspect, with surgical negligence (including PCR and dropped nucleus) being the most frequent cause for litigation claims involving complicated cataract surgery [23].

In our survey, only 44 out of 161 registrars at OST 4–7 (21.1%) reported being confident in managing PCR with vitreous loss, without senior support (Table 3). This is lower than reported in another recent UK survey, which found 74.4% of registrars at the same levels felt subjectively confident in anterior vitrectomy [13]. One reason for this disparity is due to our survey evaluating this issue exclusively with a series of directed questions at specific technical and non-technical principles, before responders self-evaluated themselves. It is usually anticipated that registrars from OST 4 onwards start to undertake independent cataract surgeries (either on their own/with a senior unscrubbed in theatre or within close vicinity). Subgroup analysis found only 14.3% at OST 4 and 38.8% at OST 5 levels rated themselves as confident enough in possessing the theoretical knowledge to independently manage PCR and vitreous loss. This increased to 60.5% of OST 6 and 90.6% of OST 7 responders. Reassuringly the majority of final year registrars exceeded the college requirement of a minimum of 350 phacoemulsification procedures and 71.9% of registrars at this level felt confident to manage vitreous loss without senior support. However a noticeable discrepancy was seen with confidence regarding fluidic parameters and anterior vitrectomy settings. Only 7.9% rated themselves as ‘very confident’ at OST 6 level. At OST 7 level, this stood at 37.5% being ‘very confident’ and 56.3% being ‘quite confident’ respectively. This survey therefore highlights a potential shortcoming in the current OST programme, particularly in registrars who will be progressing towards consultant level.

A number of solutions have been proposed to remedy this in recent years. OST curriculum delivery in the UK is regulated by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth). In 2015 the concept of mandatory simulation was introduced by the RCOphth into the OST curriculum. While wet-lab environments facilitating the use of enucleated animal [24] or model eyes [25] are well established, their effectiveness is limited by the lack of feedback or objective assessment when undertaken alone. This has led to high-fidelity virtual reality simulators gaining an increased prominence in ophthalmic training programmes. In 2010, the use of EyeSi® (VRmagic, Mannheim, Germany) was first introduced into UK training programmes and is continuing to gather evidence for its beneficial role in training. Studies have noted the ability of the EyeSi® to distinguish between novice, intermediate and advanced surgeon [26, 27] as well as to enable transference of skills acquired into the operating theatre [28]. Both these attributes allow for surgical training in a controlled environment. Ferris et al. conducted a UK multicentre study finding a 38% reduction in unadjusted PCR rates for first and second year registrars between 2009 and 2015, aligned with the introduction of EyeSi® [29]. As of 2017, a new EyeSi® module dedicated to anterior vitrectomy has become widely available. Other recent college curriculum developments included the introduction of ‘Entrustable Professional Activities’ workplace-based assessments in 2016, where registrars must demonstrate the ability to manage an entire cataract theatre list independently. The concept of anterior vitrectomy mock exercises has also been shown to be potentially beneficial [30], where the importance of non-technical factors and prior preparation have been demonstrated.

Although this survey captured the highest response to date on this topic, it is prone to recall bias and reliant on registrars self-evaluating themselves. There were also regional variations in response rates and across all levels of OST. Nevertheless this survey offers a unique insight into current levels of expertise amongst UK registrars in managing this complication. Despite an evolving curriculum, our survey highlighted that only half of senior trainees (OST 6–7) were confident to manage PCR independently. Significant knowledge gaps surrounding fluidics and anterior vitrectomy settings were noted in all year groups.

Conclusion

We propose that a unifying assessment for PCR and vitreous loss management be developed and incorporated into the OST curriculum. This may be best achieved through using a simulator or simulating a PCR event, which takes account of the technical and non-technical factors at play. A standardised assessment delivered from a national platform will assist in producing more confident registrars for the future and ultimately enhance patient safety in cataract surgery.

Why carry out this study?

Posterior capsule rupture (PCR) is a relatively rare event and is considered the benchmark complication for considering the safety of cataract surgery.

PCR rate is higher for trainees relative to consultants or associate specialists.

This survey aimed to ascertain the confidence of UK ophthalmic specialist trainees (OST), at different stages of residency, in managing this complication.

What was learned from the study?

Knowledge of the theoretical principles and understanding of fluidics were significantly lacking in OST years 4 and below and were not unanimous amongst more senior trainees in years 6–7.

The perceived accessibility of anterior vitrectomy simulation varies across the regions. To improve trainee competency in managing PCR, the study group suggests targeted training and simulation.