| Literature DB >> 34799768 |
Tien S Dong1,2, Jonathan P Jacobs1,2,3, Vatche Agopian4, Joseph R Pisegna3,5, Walid Ayoub6, Francisco Durazo7, Pedram Enayati6, Vinay Sundaram6, Jihane N Benhammou1, Mazen Noureddin6, Gina Choi1,4, Venu Lagishetty1,2, Oliver Fiehn8, Marc T Goodman9, David Elashoff10, Shehnaz K Hussain11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rapidly increasing in the U.S. and is a leading cause of mortality for patients with cirrhosis. Discovering novel biomarkers for risk stratification of HCC is paramount. We examined biomarkers of the gut-liver axis in a prospective multicenter cohort.Entities:
Keywords: Alloprevotella; Bile acids; Biogenic amines; Methionine; Small intestine; Taurocholic acid; Time-to-event
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34799768 PMCID: PMC9287237 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07299-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dig Dis Sci ISSN: 0163-2116 Impact factor: 3.487
Select baseline participant characteristics by HCC development
| Total | Did not Develop HCC ( | Developed HCC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or | Mean (SD) or | ||
| Age (yr) (mean) | 59.4 (12.4) | 61.4 (10.0) | 0.60 |
| CS | 96 (45.1) | 9 (64.3) | 0.37 |
| UC | 55 (25.8) | 2 (14.3) | |
| VA | 62 (29.1) | 3 (21.4) | |
| Male | 141 (66.2) | 13 (92.9) | 0.04 |
| Female | 72 (33.8) | 1 (7.1) | |
| White | 177 (83.1) | 11 (78.6) | 0.60 |
| African American | 18 (8.5) | 2 (14.3) | |
| Asian | 11 (5.2) | 1 (7.1) | |
| Other | 7 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Non-Hispanic/Latinx | 134 (62.9) | 9 (64.3) | 1.00 |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 79 (37.1) | 5 (35.7) | |
| HCV | 66 (31.0) | 7 (50.0) | 0.49 |
| Alcohol | 56 (26.3) | 2 (14.3) | |
| HBV | 6 (2.8) | 1 (7.1) | |
| NAFLD | 46 (21.6) | 2 (14.3) | |
| Other | 39 (18.3) | 2 (14.3) | |
| No | 160 (75.1) | 7 (50.0) | 0.04 |
| Yes | 53 (24.9) | 7 (50.0) | |
| No | 86 (40.4) | 4 (28.6) | 0.26 |
| Yes | 127 (59.6) | 10 (71.4) | |
| No | 119 (55.9) | 8 (57.1) | 1.00 |
| Yes | 94 (44.1) | 6 (42.9) | |
| No | 61 (28.6) | 3 (21.4) | 0.76 |
| Yes | 152 (71.4) | 11 (78.6) | |
| No | 161 (75.6) | 11 (78.6) | 1.00 |
| Yes | 52 (24.4) | 3 (21.4) | |
| AFP (ng/mL) (mean) | 5.13 (21.96) | 4.25 (3.56) | 0.88 |
| MELD (mean) | 9.7 (6.1) | 10.9 (7.8) | 0.46 |
Fig. 1Baseline duodenal microbial differences between patients who developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as compared to those that never did. a Principal coordinate analysis plot of microbial composition colored by HCC development. b Alpha diversity by Shannon Index of the microbial community between patients that developed HCC as compared to those that did not. Taxonomic plots by c phyla and genus d between patients who did develop HCC as compared to those that did not. Only taxa that had a relative abundance of ≥ 1% are shown
Fig. 2Notch box plots of metabolites that were statistically different between patients that developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as compared to those that never developed HCC. P-values listed are adjusted for sex, age, baseline HE, alkaline phosphatase, and false discovery rate
Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between baseline characteristics and risk of HCC development over the follow-up period
| Variable | Univariate cox-proportional hazards regression | Multivariate cox-proportional hazards regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | Hazard Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | |||
| CS | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| UC | 0.41 | 0.09–1.90 | 0.25 | – | – | – |
| VA | 0.61 | 0.16–2.26 | 0.46 | – | – | – |
| Age | 1.01 | 0.97–1.06 | 0.57 | 1.02 | 0.97–1.07 | 0.55 |
| Male | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| Female | 0.15 | 0.02–1.12 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.02–0.99 | 0.05 |
| White | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| African American | 1.54 | 0.34–6.94 | 0.58 | – | – | – |
| Asian | 1.43 | 0.18–11.11 | 0.73 | – | – | – |
| Other | NE | – | – | – | ||
| – | – | |||||
| Non-Hispanic/Latinx | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| Hispanic or Latinx | 1.06 | 0.36–3.17 | 0.91 | – | – | – |
| HCV | 1.00 | (reference category) | - | – | – | |
| Alcohol | 0.39 | 0.08–1.89 | 0.24 | – | – | – |
| HBV | 1.48 | 0.18–12.06 | 0.71 | – | – | – |
| NAFLD | 0.45 | 0.09–2.16 | 0.32 | – | – | – |
| Other | 0.52 | 0.11–2.49 | 0.41 | – | – | – |
| No | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| Yes | 3.12 | 1.093–8.895 | 0.03 | 4.65 | 1.60–13.52 | 0.01 |
| No | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| Yes | 1.76 | 0.56–5.66 | 0.33 | |||
| No | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| Yes | 0.993 | 0.344–2.86 | 0.99 | – | – | – |
| Diabetes | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | (reference category) | – | – | – | |
| Yes | 0.861 | 0.240–3.088 | 0.82 | – | – | – |
| AFP (ng/mL) | 0.996 | 0.965–1.03 | 0.84 | – | – | – |
| MELD | 1.034 | 0.955–1.121 | 0.41 | – | – | – |
| AlkPhos (IU/l) | 0.987 | 0.974–1.001 | 0.07 | 0.99 | 0.97–1.00 | 0.11 |
| AST (IU/l) | 1.004 | 0.994–1.014 | 0.47 | – | – | – |
| ALT (IU/l) | 0.994 | 0.972–1.018 | 0.65 | – | – | – |
| Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 1.059 | 0.925–1.212 | 0.41 | – | – | – |
| INR | 1.89 | 0.413–8.62 | 0.41 | – | – | – |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.426 | 0.098–1.836 | 0.25 | – | – | – |
Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between baseline biomarker levels and risk of HCC development over the follow-up period
| Variable | Single Biomarker Cox- Proportional Hazards Regressiona | Multiple Biomarker Cox-Proportional Hazards Regressionb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | Hazard Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | |||
| Microbes | ||||||
| Alloprevotella Q4 | 3.22 | 1.06–9.73 | 0.04 | 2.31 | 0.76–7.02 | 0.14 |
| Biogenic amines | ||||||
| Methionine Q4 | 9.97 | 3.02–32.94 | < 0.01 | 8.76 | 2.62–29.33 | <0.01 |
| Methioninesulfoxide Q4 | 5.60 | 1.84–17.10 | < 0.01 | – | – | – |
| Bile acids | ||||||
| Taurocholic acid Q4 | 6.87 | 2.32–20.27 | < 0.01 | – | – | – |
aModels adjusted for age, sex, HE, and AlkPhos; b Models adjusted for age, sex, HE, AlkPhos, and all biomarkers in the table. Q4: quartile 4 (i.e. 75–100%) versus quartiles 1–3 (reference)
Fig. 3Kaplan Meir Curves of variables associated with increased risk of HCC development by Cox Regression adjusting for false discovery rate and age, sex, and the presence of baseline hepatic encephalopathy. a Kaplan Meir curve of duodenal Alloprevotella comparing the upper quartile to the bottom 3 quartile. b Kaplan Meir curve of duodenal taurocholic acid (serum bile acid) comparing the upper quartile to the bottom 3 quartile. c Kaplan Meir curve of duodenal methioninesulfoxide (serum metabolite) comparing the upper quartile to the bottom 3 quartile. d Kaplan Meir curve of duodenal methionine (serum metabolite) comparing the upper quartile to the bottom 3 quartile