| Literature DB >> 34795205 |
Joshua S Woodworth1, Helena Strand Clemmensen1,2, Hannah Battey1, Karin Dijkman1, Thomas Lindenstrøm1, Raquel Salvador Laureano1, Randy Taplitz3, Jeffrey Morgan4, Claus Aagaard1, Ida Rosenkrands1, Cecilia S Lindestam Arlehamn4, Peter Andersen1,5, Rasmus Mortensen6.
Abstract
Given the encouraging clinical results of both candidate subunit vaccines and revaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) against tuberculosis (TB), there is support for combining BCG and subunit vaccination for increased efficacy. BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) share ~98% of their genome and current subunit vaccines are almost exclusively designed as BCG boosters. The goal of this study is to design a TB subunit vaccine composed of antigens not shared with BCG and explore the advantages of this design in a BCG + subunit co-administration vaccine strategy. Eight protective antigens are selected to create an Mtb-specific subunit vaccine, named H107. Whereas traditional vaccines containing BCG-shared antigens exhibit in vivo cross-reactivity to BCG, H107 shows no cross-reactivity and does not inhibit BCG colonization. Instead, co-administering H107 with BCG leads to increased adaptive responses against both H107 and BCG. Importantly, rather than expanding BCG-primed T cells, H107 broadens the overall vaccine repertoire with new T cell clones and introduces 'adjuvant-imprinted' qualities including Th17 responses and less-differentiated Th1 cells. Collectively, these features of H107 are associated with a substantial increase in long-term protection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34795205 PMCID: PMC8602668 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26934-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Antigen selection for H107 vaccine.
| Protein | Rv. No. | Length (aa) | Molecular Weight (kDa) | Human Recognition | Included in clinical vaccine candidates | Protection in animals models | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPE68 | Rv3873 | 368 | 37.3 | 1,5 | Novel | Not tested | 1 Lindestam Arlehamn CS, et al. 2013 (PMID: 23358848) 2 Coppola M, et al., 2016 (PMID: 27892960) 3 Carpenter C, et al., 2015 (PMID: 26277695) 4 Bertholet, S. et al. 2008 (PMID: 19017986) 5 Okkels LM, et al., 2003 (PMID: 14573626) 6 Al‐Attiyah R, et al., 2006 (PMID: 16831212) 7 Millington KA, et al., 2011 (PMID: 21427227) | 1 Hussein J, et al., 2018 (PMID: 29321075) 2 Nemes E, et al., 2018 (PMID: 29996082) 3 Luabeya AK, et al., 2015 (PMID: 26095509) 4 Vasina DV, et al., 2019 (PMID: 31683812) | 8 Sali M, et al. 2010 (PMID: 20921146) 9 Hoang T, et al., 2013 (PMID: 24349004) 10 Knudsen NP, et al., 2014 (PMID: 24395772) 11 Aagaard C, et al., 2011 (PMID: 21258338) 12 Windish HP, et al., 2011 (PMID: 21816196) 13 Xin Q, et al., 2013 (PMID: 23967337) 14 Kalra M, et al., 2007 (PMID: 17766185) 15 Aagaard C, et al., 2020 (PMID: 32887748) 16 Clemmensen HS, et al., 2020 (PMID: 33240275) 17 Hansen SG, et al., 2018 (PMID: 29334373) 18 Kao FF, et al., 2012 (PMID: 22567094) 19 Pym AS, et al., 2003 (PMID: 12692540) 20 Kamath AT, et al., 1999 (PMID: 10085007) |
| ESAT-6 (EsxA) | Rv3875 | 95 | 9.9 | 1,2,3,4,6 | H11, H42, H563, GamTBvac4 | Mice9,10,11,14,15,16,19, NHP17, Guinea pigs19 | |||
| EspI | Rv3876 | 666 | 70.6 | 1,3,4 | Novel | Not tested | |||
| EspC | Rv3615c | 103 | 10.8 | 1,2,3,7 | Novel | Mice15 | |||
| EspA | Rv3616c | 392 | 39.9 | 2 | Novel | Mice15 | |||
| MPT64 | Rv1980c | 228 | 24.8 | 2,4,6 | Novel | Mice8,13,14,20 | |||
| MPT70 | Rv2875 | 193 | 19.1 | 1,3,4 | Novel | Mice4,12,16 | |||
| MPT83 | Rv2873 | 220 | 22.0 | 1,2,4,18 | Novel | Mice18 | |||
The H107 vaccine consists of PPE68 (Rv3873), ESAT-6 (Rv3875), EspI (Rv3876, EspC (Rv3615c), EspA (Rv3616c), MPT64 (Rv1980c), MPT70 (Rv2875) and MPT83 (Rv2873). Listed for each of the antigens; Amino acid length, the molecular weight of the protein, references to papers showing human recognition, their presence in existing vaccine candidates under clinical development as well as protection in animal models.
Fig. 1H107 combines immunogenic and protective antigens.
Individual antigen responses (a) 18 weeks after Mtb challenge, (b) 8 weeks after vaccination with BCG Danish, or (c) two weeks after three subcutaneous (s.c.) immunizations with single recombinant proteins in CAF®01 in CB6F1 mice (n = 4). Splenocytes from BCG-vaccinated mice and Mtb-challenged mice were stimulated ex vivo with individual recombinant proteins whereas single-protein vaccinated mice were stimulated with recombinant H107. Levels of IFN-γ in the supernatants after 3 days of culture were measured by ELISA. d Magnitude of IFN-γ T cell response in healthy QFT + (n = 22) and QFT- (n = 10) subjects against ESAT-6 peptides, the 8-antigen peptide pool, and MTB300. The dotted line indicates the cutoff limit at 20 SFC/106 PBMCs. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. e CB6F1 mice (left, n = 6) or B6C3F1 mice (right) were immunized three times s.c. with 2 µg individual recombinant proteins in CAF®01, BCG-Danish, or left non-vaccinated, and then challenged with aerosol Mtb Erdman. The lung CFU were determined 6 weeks postinfection. Mice from two independent B6C3F1 experiments shown as circle and triangle symbols (n = 10/grp; Ctrl, PPE68 n = 14). One-Way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. f Antigen design of the H107 fusion protein. Protein modifications can be found in Table S2. g The ESAT-6-specific immune response of splenocytes taken 2 weeks after three immunizations of CB6F1 mice with 1 µg H107/CAF®01 or H107 that lacks ESAT-6 repeats H107(-E6 rep)/CAF®01 (n = 4). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.0286. h CB6F1 mice (left, n = 6) and B6C3F1 mice (right, n = 8) were either vaccinated with 2 µg H107/CAF®01, BCG-Danish, or left nonvaccinated (Control) and challenged with Mtb Erdman by the aerosol route six weeks post the final vaccination. Lung bacterial burden determined 6 weeks after challenge. Representative data of three independent experiments performed in CB6F1 mice with similar results. One-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (CB6F1: Ctrl vs. BCG p = 0.0035, Ctrl vs. H107 p = 0.0026, BCG vs. H107 p = 0.9881; B6C3F1: Ctrl vs. BCG p = 0.0032, Ctrl vs. H107 p < 0.0001, BCG vs. H107 p = 0.0754). a–h Symbols indicate individual mice or donors, (a, e, g) bars/lines indicate mean ± SEM and (d, g) box plots indicate median, interquartile range, and minimum and maximum values. p values; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, and ns (nonsignificant).
Fig. 2H107 does not induce cross-reactive immunity to BCG.
a CB6F1 mice were immunized with H4/CAF®01, H107/CAF®01, H65/CAF®01, or MOMP/CAF®01 and inoculated intradermally (i.d.) with BCG and CFUs were determined in the spleens of vaccinated animals 3.5 weeks later (n = 8, H4 vs. H107 p = 0.0034; H65 vs. H107 p = 0.0298). b CB6F1 mice were immunized with H65/CAF®01 or H107/CAF®01 and inoculated with BCG subcutaneously (s.c.) at the tail-base. BCG CFUs were determined in the inguinal lymph nodes 6 weeks after inoculation (n = 8, two-sided unpaired t test, *p = 0.0257). c, d CB6F1 mice were immunized with saline (white), H65/CAF®01 (red), H107/CAF®01 (blue), or MOMP/CAF®01 (gray) and injected intravenously (i.v.) with BCG-Danish (c) or BCG-Japan (d) 6 weeks after the last immunization. BCG CFUs were enumerated in lungs 3.5 and 9 weeks post-BCG challenge (n = 8) and p-values shown for Saline vs. H65. All data shown as mean ± SEM. (a, c, d) One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test. p values; p values; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001, and ns (nonsignificant).
Fig. 3Co-administration of BCG + H107 adjuvants both H107- and BCG-specific immune responses.
a Schematic representation of the BCG + H107 co-administration regimen. Mice were vaccinated once with BCG and H107/CAF®01 s.c. at the base of the tail and boosted twice with H107/CAF®01 s.c., at 2-weekly intervals. b Sample contour plots of gating (left) of ICS analysis to determine the percentage of total cytokine-producing (IFN-γ [PE/Cy7], IL-2 [APC/Cy7], TNF [PE] and/or IL-17A [PerCP/Cy5.5] via Boolean OR gating) CD44high CD4 T cells after ex vivo restimulation of splenocytes with H107 protein one week post final H107 vaccination and cumulative data for each vaccine group (right). H107 vs. BCG + H107 p = 0.0003. c H107-specific responses in the spleen over a time course after BCG + H107 co-administration at sites either draining to the same (blue) or distal (dark gray) lymph nodes (n = 4). Triangles indicate vaccination events, One-Way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison test, BCG + H107 vs. BCG + H107(distal), p = 0.0358. d Cytokine levels in supernatants taken after homogenization of vaccine-draining lymph nodes one week post final H107 vaccination from H107(dark blue) and BCG + H107 (light blue) immunized mice (n = 4). e Percentage of cytokine-producing (IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF, and/or IL-17A) CD44high CD4 T cells after restimulating splenocytes with recombinant TB10.4 protein in BCG (gray) and BCG + H107 (blue) vaccinated mice (n = 4, mean ± SEM). Triangles indicate vaccination events. f TB10.4-specific CD4 T cells in the spleen as determined by I-Ad:TB10.473-88 tetramer binding one week post final H107 vaccination (n = 6). I-Ad:hCLIP103-117 negative controls included in duplicates for each group (sample pooled from six animals). Two-tailed unpaired t test, p = 0.0241. g TB10.4-specific T cells 1 week postfinal MOMP vaccination measured by ICS as in (e). Mice (n = 6) were vaccinated with buffer only (naïve), CAF®01 adjuvant alone, BCG, BCG + CAF®01 or BCG + MOMP/CAF®01. CAF®01 vs. BCG p = 0.0398, BCG vs. BCG + MOMP/CAF®01 p = 0.0465. h Bacterial burden in the lungs 3.5 and 16 weeks post aerosol Mtb infection (p.i.) (n = 8). b, f, g, h Lines indicated mean ± SEM with symbols indicating individual mice. All data are plotted as mean ± SEM. b, c, g, h One-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test. p values; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, and ns (nonsignificant).
Fig. 4H107 induces novel T cell clones in BCG memory mice.
a Experimental setup in which CB6F1 mice were immunized s.c. with BCG and rested eight-nine months to create memory mice (BCGmem). BCGmem mice were then boosted by immunizing three times with H65/CAF®01 or H107/CAF®01 at 2-week intervals and analyzed 8–10 days after final immunization for CD4 T cell response magnitude via intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and clonal expansion versus nonboosted BCGmem controls via TCR mRNA sequence analysis. b Percentage of cytokine-producing (IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF, and/or IL-17A) CD44high CD4 T cells after ex vivo restimulation of splenocytes with recombinant H65 or H107 protein 8 days after final subunit immunization. Line, meam±SEM; symbols, individual mice (n = 4/grp). One-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test, BCGmem vs. H65-boost p = 0.0307. c The number of new T cell clones defined by comparison of TCR-β V-J pairings identified in purified Tmem/Teff CD4 T cells from BCGmem animals with 5 µg H65- or H107-boosted mice. d Average expansion of identified new clones relative to BCGmem control for each subsample comparison in which a significantly expanded novel clonal cluster was identified. c, d Symbols indicate individual subsampled TCR-β sequence data comparison (n = 200), box plots indicate median, interquartile range, and minimum and maximum values, p values determined by two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction.
Fig. 5Vaccine-specific T cells induced by BCG + H107 co-administration preferentially acquire a less-differentiated profile and Th17 functionality.
a–e CB6F1 mice were immunized s.c. with BCG (gray), BCG + H65/CAF®01 co-administration (red), or BCG + H107/CAF®01 co-administration (blue). Five to seven weeks post final immunization, splenocytes were restimulated ex vivo with either H65 (BCG, BCG + H65) or H107 (BCG + H107) for intracellular cytokine staining (ICS). a Frequency of antigen-specific CD4 T cells producing TNF, IFN-γ, IL-2, or IL-17 after restimulation assessed six weeks after immunization (n = 5/grp). BCG vs. BCG + H65 p = 0.0015. b Principal component analysis (PCA) of vaccine-specific CD4 T cells from (a) for TNF/ IFN-γ/IL-2, IL-17, RORγT, T-bet, KLRG1, and CCR7 expression. Percentages on axes indicate variance explained by each PC. c Boolean gating analysis of TNFα/IFN-γ/IL-2 expression of antigen-specific CD4 T cells analyzed independently 5–7 weeks post immunization. Pies indicate the average proportion of antigen-specific T cells with each combination of cytokine expression. The dotted arches illustrate the fraction of specific CD4 T cells that produced IFN-γ. d The Functional differentiation score (FDS) was calculated as the ratio of [IFN-γ producers]:[IFN-γ nonproducers] for individual mice 5 (up triangles), 6 (squares), and 7 (down triangles) weeks postimmunization. e Percentage of antigen-specific CD4 T cells expressing IL-17 after ex vivo antigen restimulation from mice analyzed independently at 5 (up triangles)), 6 (squares), and 7 (down triangles) weeks postimmunization (d, e: BCG, BCG + H65 n = 15, BCG + H107 n = 14). f–j CB6F1 mice were immunized s.c. by co-administration of BCG and H65 + H107 simultaneously in CAF®01 (BCG + H65 + H107) or left unimmunized (No Vacc), rested for 6 weeks, and infected with aerosolized Mtb Erdman. Lung mononuclear cells were isolated at 27 (up triangles) and 33 (circles) days after Mtb infection and assessed by (f–h) ex vivo restimulated with H65 (red), H107 (blue), TB10.471-88 (red), or ESAT-61-15 (blue), followed by ICS or (I, j) class II MHC tetramer staining. f Frequency of antigen-specific lung CD4 T cells producing TNF, IFN-γ, IL-2, or IL-17 after protein restimulation, calculated after subtraction of background (media-only stimulated cells). g FDS of cells from (f). h Proportion of antigen-specific lung CD4 T cells expressing IL-17 after (left) whole vaccine protein stimulation (**p = 0.0034) or (right) individual antigenic peptide epitope stimulation. i A representative contour plot from a BCG + H65 + H107 animal 27 days post-Mtb infection showing identification of antigen-specific lung CD4 T cells by I-Ad:TB10.473-88 (red) or I-Ab:ESAT-64-17 (blue) tetramer staining, and (j) the proportion of tetramer-binding cell expressing (left) surface KLRG1 (**p = 0.0010) or (right) intracellular RORγT (**p = 0.0056) at 27 (up triangles) and 33 (circles) days post Mtb infection. f–h, j No Vacc. n = 6, BCG + H65 + H107 n = 12. a–j Symbols indicate individual animals. Line mean ± SEM. p values; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, and ns (nonsignificant) based on (a, d, e) one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test and (g, h, j) paired two-tailed t test. Pie slices represent the average relative proportion of each T cell subset of normalized values from individual animals.
Fig. 6H107 and BCG co-administration induces synergistic protection.
CB6F1 mice were immunized once s.c. with BCG, three times s.c. with saline or 1 µg H107/CAF®01, or co-administered BCG with H65/CAF®01 or H107/CAF®01 followed by two subunit boosts(n = 8). The bacterial burden was determined in the lungs 4 and 18 weeks postinfection (p.i.). Symbols indicate individual mice with lines indicating mean ± SEM. One-Way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. p values; **p < 0.01 (wk4 p = 0.0012, wk18 p = 0.0056), ****p < 0.0001, and ns (nonsignificant).