| Literature DB >> 28387329 |
Morten Ruhwald1, Lena de Thurah1,2, Davis Kuchaka3, Mostafa Rafaat Zaher4,5, Ahmed M Salman6, Abdel-Rahman Abdel-Ghaffar6, Faten Aly Shoukry7, Sascha Wilk Michelsen1, Bolette Soborg1, Thomas Blauenfeldt1, Stellah Mpagama8, Søren T Hoff1, Else Marie Agger1, Ida Rosenkrands1, Claus Aagard2, Gibson Kibiki3, Nabila El-Sheikh4, Peter Andersen1.
Abstract
There is a need for an improved vaccine for tuberculosis. ESAT-6 is a cardinal vaccine antigen with unique properties and is included in several vaccine candidates in development. ESAT-6 is also the core antigen in the IFN-γ release assays (IGRA) used to diagnose latent infection, rendering IGRA tests unspecific after vaccination. This challenge has prompted the development of a companion diagnostic for ESAT-6 based vaccines, an ESAT-6 free IGRA. We screened a panel of seven potential new diagnostic antigens not recognized in BCG vaccinated individuals. Three highly recognized antigens EspC, EspF and Rv2348c were identified and combined with CFP10 in an ESAT-6 free antigen cocktail. The cocktail was prepared in a field-friendly format, lyophilized with heparin in ready-to-use vacutainer tubes. The diagnostic performance of the ESAT-6 free IGRA was determined in a cross-validation study. Compared IGRA, the ESAT-6 free IGRA induced a comparable magnitude of IFN-γ release, and the diagnostic performance was on par with Quantiferon (sensitivity 84% vs 79%; specificity 99% vs 97%). The comparable performance of the ESAT-6 free IGRA to IGRA suggests potential as companion diagnostic for ESAT-6 containing vaccines and as adjunct test for latent infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28387329 PMCID: PMC5384086 DOI: 10.1038/srep45969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Overview of screened antigens and peptides.
| Name | Rv No | Function | Protein length | Fraction assessed | No. of peptides | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESAT-6 | Rv3875 | RD1, ESX1 substrate | 95 | 1–95 | 7 | |
| CFP10 | Rv3874 | RD1, ESX1 substrate | 100 | 1–100 | 6 | |
| TB7.7 | Rv2654c | RD11, unknown | 81 | 1–81 | 6 | |
| PPE68 | Rv3873 | RD1, PPE family | 368 | 147–204 | 5 | |
| EspJ | Rv3878 | RD1, ESX1 associated protein | 280 | 122–189 | 5 | |
| EspC | Rv3615c | ESX1 substrate | 103 | 54–103 | 4 | |
| EspF | Rv3865 | ESX1 associated protein | 103 | 9–44 | 3 | |
| EccD1-A | Rv3877 | RD1, ESX1 protein (predicted surface regions) | 511 | 218–282 | 5 | |
| EccD1-B | 442–511 | 5 | ||||
| PE35-A | Rv3872 | RD1, PE family | 99 | 1–59 | 4 | |
| PE35-B | 53–99 | 3 | ||||
| Rv2348-A | Rv2348c | RD7, unknown | 108 | 1–64 | 5 | |
| Rv2348-B | 55–108 | 5 |
Figure 1IFN-γ release to QFT antigens, 10 screened Mtb specific antigens and selected regions within antigens.
Diluted whole blood from 48 patients with TB (A) 34 Egyptian and 14 from Greenland), 18 Mtb infected controls from Greenland (B) and 56 uninfected controls from Egypt (C) was stimulated 24 hours with overlapping peptides (as described in Table 1) in 200 ul volume. IFN-γ release was determined using in-house ELISA and presented following subtraction of IFN-γ release in an unstimulated control well. Median values are indicated in red.
Responder rates in TB patients, LTBI and controls. A responder is defined as antigen-specific release >50 pg/ml IFN-γ.
| Antigen, n (%) | TB (n = 48) | LTBI (n = 18) | Ctrl (n = 56) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESAT-6 | 19 (40) | 9 (50) | 0 (0) |
| CFP1 | 27 (56) | 11 (61) | 0 (0) |
| TB7.7 | 3 (6) | 1 (6) | 1 (2) |
| PPE68 | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 3 (5) |
| EspJ | 5 (10) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) |
| EspC | 22 (46) | 8 (44) | 1 (2) |
| EspF | 11 (23) | 6 (33) | 2 (4) |
| EccD1-A | 6 (13) | 4 (22) | 2 (4) |
| EccD1-B | 2 (4) | 4 (22) | 1 (2) |
| PE35-A | 2 (4) | 1 (6) | 1 (2) |
| PE35-B | 3 (6) | 3 (17) | 1 (2) |
| Rv2348-A | 5 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Rv2348-B | 6 (13) | 8 (44) | 2 (4) |
Overview of antigen complementarity and recognition patterns in TB and LTBI groups and controls.
| ESAT-6 | CFP10 | EspC | EspF | Rv2348-B | EccD1-A | n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB and LTBI (n = 66) | − | − | − | − | − | − | 19 (29) |
| − | − | − | − | + | − | 2 (3) | |
| − | − | + | − | − | − | 2 (3) | |
| − | − | + | − | + | − | 1 (2) | |
| − | − | + | + | − | − | 1 (2) | |
| − | + | − | − | − | − | 8 (12) | |
| − | + | − | − | + | − | 1 (2) | |
| − | + | + | − | − | − | 2 (3) | |
| − | + | + | + | − | − | 1 (2) | |
| − | + | + | + | + | − | 1 (2) | |
| + | − | + | − | − | − | 2 (3) | |
| + | − | + | + | − | − | 1 (2) | |
| + | + | − | − | − | − | 5 (8) | |
| + | + | − | + | + | − | 1 (2) | |
| + | + | + | − | − | − | 6 (9) | |
| + | + | + | − | + | + | 1 (2) | |
| + | + | + | + | − | − | 4 (6) | |
| + | + | + | + | − | + | 1 (1) | |
| + | + | + | + | + | − | 3 (5) | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | 4 (6) | |
| n (%) | 28 (42) | 38 (58) | 30 (45) | 17 (26) | 14 (21) | 6 (9) | |
| Control (n = 56) | − | − | − | − | − | − | 52 (93) |
| − | − | − | − | + | − | 2 (4) | |
| − | − | − | + | − | + | 1 (2) | |
| − | − | + | + | − | − | 1 (2) | |
| n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 2 (4) | 2 (4) | 1 (2) |
Response patterns to ESAT-6, CFP10, EspC, EspF, Rv2348B and EccD1-A antigens pools were calculated for each individual with a responder defined as antigen-specific release >50 pg/ml IFN-γ (+). Recognition pattern is described with +/− and the number of donors with the specific antigen recognition pattern is summarized in the right column as number of volunteers with the specific pattern and % of total.
Baseline table, cases and controls used to determine cut off in cross validation study.
| TB cases | Controls | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | 100 | |
| 66 (86) | 34 (34) | |
| 35 (28–52) | 29 (24–42) | |
| Egypt | 74 (100) | 0 (0) |
| Denmark | 0 (0) | 89 (89) |
| Other low endemic | 0 (0) | 11 (11) |
| yes | 37 (50) | 58 (58) |
| no | 0 (0) | 23 (23) |
| unknown | 37 (50) | 19 (19) |
| None | 52 (70) | 97 (97) |
| Yes | 22 (30) | 2 (2) |
| unknown | 0 (0) | 1 (1) |
| 0 weeks | 52 (70) | — |
| <2 weeks | 22 (30) | — |
| positive | 71 (96) | — |
| negative | 3 (4) | — |
| n.d. | 0 (0) | — |
| positive | 64 (87) | — |
| negative | 7 (9) | — |
| n.d. | 3 (4) | — |
Figure 2Antigen specific release of IFN-γ in patients (left, n = 74) and controls (right, n = 100) stimulated with QFT and ESAT-6 free IGRA cocktails.
One ml whole blood was stimulated 18–24 h in antigen coated heparinized vacutainer tubes (in-house and QFT (Qiagen)), antigen specific IFN-γ release was determined using QFT ELISA (Qiagen) and is presented subtracting unspecific release (nil) in heparinized vacutainer tubes with no peptides (in-house and QFT (Qiagen)). Kruskal-Wallis test.
Figure 3ROC Curve analysis comparing the diagnostic potential of ESAT-6 free IGRA and QFT (Qiagen).
Analysis included samples from 74 patients and 100 controls. The Area Under the Curve reflects the antigen cocktails’ ability to differentiate between cases and controls. AUC for QFT (Qiagen) 0.96 (95% CI 0.92–0.99), ESAT-6 free IGRA (IFN-γ) 0.95 (95% CI 0.91–0.99). There was no significant difference between the ROC curves.
Test results in validation cohort, patients with confirmed active TB (n = 68) and endemic controls (n = 35) from Tanzania.
| QFT (IFN-γ) | QFT (IP-10) | ESAT-6 free IGRA (IFN-γ) | ESAT-6 free IGRA (IP-10) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n = 68) | Positive | 54 (79) | 54 (79) | 56 (84) | 50 (74) |
| Negative | 12 (20) | 12 (20) | 11 (16) | 17 (25) | |
| Indeterminate | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | |
| Endemic controls (n = 35) | Positive | 17 (49) | 15 (43) | 17 (49) | 13 (37)* |
| Negative | 18 (51) | 20 (57) | 18 (51) | 22 (63) | |
| Indeterminate | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
IFN-γ and IP-10 levels were determined using ELISA and deemed positive, negative and indeterminate using cut offs determined in a training set 0.25 IU/ml for ESAT-6 free IGRA (IFN-γ), 1.0 ng/ml for ESAT-6 free IGRA (IP-10) and 1.3 for QFT (IP-10). *p = 0.046, McNemars test compared to QFT (IFN-γ), all other comparisons to QFT (IFN-γ) were non-significant.