Anna-Lena Theisen1, Michael Lassmann1, Johannes Tran-Gia2. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany Tran_J@ukw.de.
Abstract
Quantitative SPECT/CT imaging is currently the state of the art for peritherapeutic monitoring of radiopharmaceutical distributions. Because of poor resolution, however, the verification of SPECT/CT-based activity distributions is of particular importance. Because of the lack of a ground truth in patient measurements, phantoms are commonly used as a substitute for clinical validation of quantitative SPECT/CT. Because of the time-consuming and erroneous preparation of multicompartment phantoms, such as for the kidney, the usually very complex internal activity distributions are typically replaced by 1- or 2-compartment models. To provide a simplified solution for generating inhomogeneous activity distributions, this work presents a methodology for designing single-compartment phantoms that mimic inhomogeneous spatial activity distributions by using internal filling structures of different volume fractions. Methods: A series of phantoms with different filling structures was designed, 3-dimensionally printed, and measured. After assessing the feasibility of the presented approach in a simple geometry, a set of three patient-specific kidney phantoms was designed on the basis of the contrast-enhanced CT scan of a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Internal gyroid structures of different wall thicknesses were used in the renal medulla and cortex to reproduce the inhomogeneous activity distribution observed in a peritherapeutic SPECT/CT acquisition 24 h after injection of 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (apparent activity concentration ratios of 1:1, 1:3.5, and 1:7.5). After 3-dimensional printing, SPECT/CT experiments were performed and the results were compared with the patient data for different reconstruction settings (iterations, subsets, and postfiltering). Results: Good agreement was found between phantom designs and fabricated phantoms (based on high-resolution CT). No internal filling structures were visible in any of the SPECT images, indicating a sufficiently small feature size. Although good visual and quantitative agreement was achieved for certain combinations of filling structure and reconstruction, a histogram analysis indicated an even more complex activity distribution in the patient than represented by the two compartments assumed in our model. Conclusion: The proposed methodology provides patient-specific phantoms mimicking inhomogeneous activity distributions while using a single stock solution, thus simplifying the filling process and reducing uncertainties in the activity determination. This method enables an unprecedented possibility for patient-specific evaluation of radiopharmaceutical uptake, reducing uncertainties in internal dosimetry and individualized treatments.
Quantitative SPECT/CT imaging is currently the state of the art for peritherapeutic monitoring of radiopharmaceutical distributions. Because of poor resolution, however, the verification of SPECT/CT-based activity distributions is of particular importance. Because of the lack of a ground truth in patient measurements, phantoms are commonly used as a substitute for clinical validation of quantitative SPECT/CT. Because of the time-consuming and erroneous preparation of multicompartment phantoms, such as for the kidney, the usually very complex internal activity distributions are typically replaced by 1- or 2-compartment models. To provide a simplified solution for generating inhomogeneous activity distributions, this work presents a methodology for designing single-compartment phantoms that mimic inhomogeneous spatial activity distributions by using internal filling structures of different volume fractions. Methods: A series of phantoms with different filling structures was designed, 3-dimensionally printed, and measured. After assessing the feasibility of the presented approach in a simple geometry, a set of three patient-specific kidney phantoms was designed on the basis of the contrast-enhanced CT scan of a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Internal gyroid structures of different wall thicknesses were used in the renal medulla and cortex to reproduce the inhomogeneous activity distribution observed in a peritherapeutic SPECT/CT acquisition 24 h after injection of 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (apparent activity concentration ratios of 1:1, 1:3.5, and 1:7.5). After 3-dimensional printing, SPECT/CT experiments were performed and the results were compared with the patient data for different reconstruction settings (iterations, subsets, and postfiltering). Results: Good agreement was found between phantom designs and fabricated phantoms (based on high-resolution CT). No internal filling structures were visible in any of the SPECT images, indicating a sufficiently small feature size. Although good visual and quantitative agreement was achieved for certain combinations of filling structure and reconstruction, a histogram analysis indicated an even more complex activity distribution in the patient than represented by the two compartments assumed in our model. Conclusion: The proposed methodology provides patient-specific phantoms mimicking inhomogeneous activity distributions while using a single stock solution, thus simplifying the filling process and reducing uncertainties in the activity determination. This method enables an unprecedented possibility for patient-specific evaluation of radiopharmaceutical uptake, reducing uncertainties in internal dosimetry and individualized treatments.
Authors: Erik Vegt; Marion de Jong; Jack F M Wetzels; Rosalinde Masereeuw; Marleen Melis; Wim J G Oyen; Martin Gotthardt; Otto C Boerman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Dik J Kwekkeboom; Wouter W de Herder; Boen L Kam; Casper H van Eijck; Martijn van Essen; Peter P Kooij; Richard A Feelders; Maarten O van Aken; Eric P Krenning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marion De Jong; Roelf Valkema; Arthur Van Gameren; Hester Van Boven; Axel Bex; Eric Pieter Van De Weyer; Jan Dirk Burggraaf; Meike Körner; Jean-Claude Reubi; Eric P Krenning Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Johannes Tran-Gia; Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Kelley M Ferreira; Andrew P Robinson; Nicholas Calvert; Andrew J Fenwick; Domenico Finocchiaro; Federica Fioroni; Elisa Grassi; Warda Heetun; Stephanie J Jewitt; Maria Kotzassarlidou; Michael Ljungberg; Daniel R McGowan; Nathaniel Scott; James Scuffham; Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Jill Tipping; Jill Wevrett; Michael Lassmann Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2021-07-23