Daniele Belvisi1,2, Marco Canevelli1,3, Matteo Costanzo1, Margherita Giangrosso1, Andrea Fabbrini1, Andrea Borraccino1, Giuseppe Bruno1, Alfredo Berardelli1,2, Giovanni Fabbrini4,5. 1. Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. 2. IRCCS Neuromed, via Atinense 18, 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. 3. National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. giovanni.fabbrini@uniroma1.it. 5. IRCCS Neuromed, via Atinense 18, 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. giovanni.fabbrini@uniroma1.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Frailty is an age-related state of increased risk for health-related adverse outcomes that reflects multisystem physiological changes and likely influences the clinical expression and disease progression of neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of the present study was to assess the potential relationship between frailty, as assessed by a frailty index (FI), and motor symptom severity, motor subtypes, and non-motor domains in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 150 PD patients. We administered an FI specifically designed for PD that included 50 age-related multidimensional biological deficits. Patients underwent a clinical assessment that evaluated motor and non-motor manifestations of PD. Using the FI score, we classified PD patients as relatively fit (FI ≤ 0.10), less fit (0.10 < FI ≤ 0.21), or frail (FI > 0.21). A linear regression model was designed to explore possible associations between frailty level and PD motor and non-motor manifestations. RESULTS: Frail patients showed greater motor symptom severity and motor complications than fitter patients. A trend towards a higher prevalence of the postural instability/gait disorder subtype was also observed in frail versus relatively fit and less fit patients. The global burden of non-motor symptoms was higher in frail patients. Increased frailty was associated with more severe motor and non-motor symptoms, as well as with more pronounced cognitive deficits. These associations remained significant even when "traditional" predictors of PD severity (age, disease duration, and levodopa equivalent daily dose) were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that the FI is associated with both motor and non-motor features of PD.
BACKGROUND: Frailty is an age-related state of increased risk for health-related adverse outcomes that reflects multisystem physiological changes and likely influences the clinical expression and disease progression of neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of the present study was to assess the potential relationship between frailty, as assessed by a frailty index (FI), and motor symptom severity, motor subtypes, and non-motor domains in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 150 PD patients. We administered an FI specifically designed for PD that included 50 age-related multidimensional biological deficits. Patients underwent a clinical assessment that evaluated motor and non-motor manifestations of PD. Using the FI score, we classified PD patients as relatively fit (FI ≤ 0.10), less fit (0.10 < FI ≤ 0.21), or frail (FI > 0.21). A linear regression model was designed to explore possible associations between frailty level and PD motor and non-motor manifestations. RESULTS: Frail patients showed greater motor symptom severity and motor complications than fitter patients. A trend towards a higher prevalence of the postural instability/gait disorder subtype was also observed in frail versus relatively fit and less fit patients. The global burden of non-motor symptoms was higher in frail patients. Increased frailty was associated with more severe motor and non-motor symptoms, as well as with more pronounced cognitive deficits. These associations remained significant even when "traditional" predictors of PD severity (age, disease duration, and levodopa equivalent daily dose) were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that the FI is associated with both motor and non-motor features of PD.
Authors: Jeremy Walston; Evan C Hadley; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski; William B Ershler; Tamara Harris; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: J A Obeso; M Stamelou; C G Goetz; W Poewe; A E Lang; D Weintraub; D Burn; G M Halliday; E Bezard; S Przedborski; S Lehericy; D J Brooks; J C Rothwell; M Hallett; M R DeLong; C Marras; C M Tanner; G W Ross; J W Langston; C Klein; V Bonifati; J Jankovic; A M Lozano; G Deuschl; H Bergman; E Tolosa; M Rodriguez-Violante; S Fahn; R B Postuma; D Berg; K Marek; D G Standaert; D J Surmeier; C W Olanow; J H Kordower; P Calabresi; A H V Schapira; A J Stoessl Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Emiel O Hoogendijk; Jonathan Afilalo; Kristine E Ensrud; Paul Kowal; Graziano Onder; Linda P Fried Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Silvia Rios Romenets; Julius B M Anang; Véronique Latreille; Jean-François Gagnon; Ronald B Postuma Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: S J G Lewis; T Foltynie; A D Blackwell; T W Robbins; A M Owen; R A Barker Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.154