Alexander J Sundermann1,2,3, Jieshi Chen4, Praveen Kumar5, Ashley M Ayres6, Shu Ting Cho2, Chinelo Ezeonwuka1,2, Marissa P Griffith1,2, James K Miller4, Mustapha M Mustapha1,2, A William Pasculle7, Melissa I Saul8, Kathleen A Shutt1,2, Vatsala Srinivasa1,2, Kady Waggle1,2, Daniel J Snyder9, Vaughn S Cooper9, Daria Van Tyne2, Graham M Snyder2,6, Jane W Marsh1,2, Artur Dubrawski4, Mark S Roberts5,8, Lee H Harrison1,2,3. 1. Microbial Genomic Epidemiology Laboratory, Center for Genomic Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Auton Lab, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, UPMC Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 7. Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USAand. 9. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and Center for Evolutionary Biology and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most hospitals use traditional infection prevention (IP) methods for outbreak detection. We developed the Enhanced Detection System for Healthcare-Associated Transmission (EDS-HAT), which combines whole-genome sequencing (WGS) surveillance and machine learning (ML) of the electronic health record (EHR) to identify undetected outbreaks and the responsible transmission routes, respectively. METHODS: We performed WGS surveillance of healthcare-associated bacterial pathogens from November 2016 to November 2018. EHR ML was used to identify the transmission routes for WGS-detected outbreaks, which were investigated by an IP expert. Potential infections prevented were estimated and compared with traditional IP practice during the same period. RESULTS: Of 3165 isolates, there were 2752 unique patient isolates in 99 clusters involving 297 (10.8%) patient isolates identified by WGS; clusters ranged from 2-14 patients. At least 1 transmission route was detected for 65.7% of clusters. During the same time, traditional IP investigation prompted WGS for 15 suspected outbreaks involving 133 patients, for which transmission events were identified for 5 (3.8%). If EDS-HAT had been running in real time, 25-63 transmissions could have been prevented. EDS-HAT was found to be cost-saving and more effective than traditional IP practice, with overall savings of $192 408-$692 532. CONCLUSIONS: EDS-HAT detected multiple outbreaks not identified using traditional IP methods, correctly identified the transmission routes for most outbreaks, and would save the hospital substantial costs. Traditional IP practice misidentified outbreaks for which transmission did not occur. WGS surveillance combined with EHR ML has the potential to save costs and enhance patient safety.
BACKGROUND: Most hospitals use traditional infection prevention (IP) methods for outbreak detection. We developed the Enhanced Detection System for Healthcare-Associated Transmission (EDS-HAT), which combines whole-genome sequencing (WGS) surveillance and machine learning (ML) of the electronic health record (EHR) to identify undetected outbreaks and the responsible transmission routes, respectively. METHODS: We performed WGS surveillance of healthcare-associated bacterial pathogens from November 2016 to November 2018. EHR ML was used to identify the transmission routes for WGS-detected outbreaks, which were investigated by an IP expert. Potential infections prevented were estimated and compared with traditional IP practice during the same period. RESULTS: Of 3165 isolates, there were 2752 unique patient isolates in 99 clusters involving 297 (10.8%) patient isolates identified by WGS; clusters ranged from 2-14 patients. At least 1 transmission route was detected for 65.7% of clusters. During the same time, traditional IP investigation prompted WGS for 15 suspected outbreaks involving 133 patients, for which transmission events were identified for 5 (3.8%). If EDS-HAT had been running in real time, 25-63 transmissions could have been prevented. EDS-HAT was found to be cost-saving and more effective than traditional IP practice, with overall savings of $192 408-$692 532. CONCLUSIONS: EDS-HAT detected multiple outbreaks not identified using traditional IP methods, correctly identified the transmission routes for most outbreaks, and would save the hospital substantial costs. Traditional IP practice misidentified outbreaks for which transmission did not occur. WGS surveillance combined with EHR ML has the potential to save costs and enhance patient safety.
Authors: Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner Journal: J Comput Biol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Robyn S Lee; Benjamin P Howden; M Lindsay Grayson; Norelle L Sherry; Claire L Gorrie; Jason C Kwong; Rhonda L Stuart; Tony M Korman; Caroline Marshall; Charlie Higgs; Hiu Tat Chan; Maryza Graham; Paul D R Johnson; Marcel J Leroi; Caroline Reed; Michael J Richards; Monica A Slavin; Leon J Worth Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Alexander J Sundermann; James K Miller; Jane W Marsh; Melissa I Saul; Kathleen A Shutt; Marissa Pacey; Mustapha M Mustapha; Ashley Ayres; A William Pasculle; Jieshi Chen; Graham M Snyder; Artur W Dubrawski; Lee H Harrison Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Alexander J Sundermann; Ahmed Babiker; Jane W Marsh; Kathleen A Shutt; Mustapha M Mustapha; Anthony W Pasculle; Chinelo Ezeonwuka; Melissa I Saul; Marissa P Pacey; Daria Van Tyne; Ashley M Ayres; Vaughn S Cooper; Graham M Snyder; Lee H Harrison Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Doyle V Ward; Andrew G Hoss; Raivo Kolde; Helen C van Aggelen; Joshua Loving; Stephen A Smith; Deborah A Mack; Raja Kathirvel; Jeffery A Halperin; Douglas J Buell; Brian E Wong; Judy L Ashworth; Mary M Fortunato-Habib; Liyi Xu; Bruce A Barton; Peter Lazar; Juan J Carmona; Jomol Mathew; Ivan S Salgo; Brian D Gross; Richard T Ellison Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Alison L Galdys; Jane W Marsh; Edgar Delgado; A William Pasculle; Marissa Pacey; Ashley M Ayres; Amy Metzger; Lee H Harrison; Carlene A Muto Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Mustapha M Mustapha; Vatsala R Srinivasa; Marissa P Griffith; Shu-Ting Cho; Daniel R Evans; Kady Waggle; Chinelo Ezeonwuka; Daniel J Snyder; Jane W Marsh; Lee H Harrison; Vaughn S Cooper; Daria Van Tyne Journal: mSystems Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Johanna Koehler; Barbara Ritzer; Simon Weidlich; Friedemann Gebhardt; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Jens Gempt; Christiane Querbach; Dieter Hoffmann; Bernhard Haller; Roland M Schmid; Jochen Schneider; Christoph D Spinner; Roman Iakoubov Journal: Infection Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.553