| Literature DB >> 34790065 |
Jonathan R Olsen1, Kevin Y K Leung2, Natalie Nicholls1, Becky P Y Loo2.
Abstract
Many studies have explored the influence of individual and neighbourhood factors on active school travel (AST), this novel study is the first to examine how AST and formal extracurricular activities are associated with children's active lifestyles. The aims of this study were to (a) create an active lifestyle variable (ALIFE) measured in terms of total weekly minutes of AST and extracurricular activities, and (b) explore how ALIFE is associated with different attributes at the individual, household and neighbourhood levels, and how these relationships differ for children aged 10 and 11 years old across the three cities: Glasgow, Edinburgh and Hong Kong. We found environmental factors to be important indicators of lower AST, for example greater parking facility density. The most substantial contribution to children's overall ALIFE was household income, those from the lowest household group having almost 2 h less ALIFE per-week than those from the highest income.Entities:
Keywords: After-school activities; children; everyday life; inequality; international
Year: 2020 PMID: 34790065 PMCID: PMC7611993 DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2020.1828826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Child Geogr ISSN: 1473-3277
Figure 1A multi-scale environment-people conceptual framework to understand children’s active lifestyles (adapted from (Loo et al. 2017b, 2017c).
Participant characteristics by city, main children’s active lifestyles (ALIFE) and secondary Active School Travel (AST) study outcome.
| Participant characteristics | Glasgow | Edinburgh | Hong Kong | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % | ALIFE (mean minutes) | % AST |
| % | ALIFE (mean minutes) | % AST |
| % | ALIFE (mean minutes) | % AST | ||
| Sample size | City | 93 | 20.7 | 422.7 | 39.8 | 70 | 15.6 | 401.3 | 47.1 | 286 | 63.7 | 321.9 | 34.3 |
| Sex | Male | 49 | 52.7 | 367.8 | 28.6 | 29 | 41.4 | 375.2 | 55.2 | 159 | 55.6 | 349.7 | 37.7 |
| Female | 44 | 47.3 | 483.9 | 52.3 | 41 | 58.6 | 419.8 | 41.5 | 127 | 44.4 | 286.5 | 29.9 | |
| Age | 10 | 33 | 35.5 | 406.1 | 27.3 | 25 | 35.7 | 336 | 36.0 | 130 | 45.5 | 342.8 | 35.4 |
| 11 | 60 | 64.5 | 431.8 | 46.7 | 45 | 64.3 | 437.6 | 53.3 | 156 | 54.5 | 304.0 | 33.3 | |
| Household Income (GBP) | <19,999 | 10 | 10.8 | 458.7 | 70 | - | - | 238.6 | 44.4 | 32 | 11.2 | 229.9 | 40.6 |
| 20,000–37,999 | 22 | 23.7 | 353.6 | 31.8 | - | - | 317.6 | 56.3 | 69 | 24.1 | 318.2 | 40.6 | |
| ≥38,000 | 53 | 57.0 | 464.6 | 39.6 | - | - | 467.0 | 46.5 | 167 | 58.4 | 347.9 | 31.1 | |
| Missing |
| - |
| ||||||||||
| Car ownership | Yes | - | - | 425.4 | 38.5 | - | - | 420.6 | 44.4 | 148 | 51.7 | 329.2 | 23.4 |
| No | - | - | 301.2 | 100.0 | - | - | 227.9 | 71.4 | 138 | 48.3 | 313.6 | 40.6 | |
| Overweight/Obese | Yes | 17 | 18.3 | 444.0 | 35.3 | 24 | 34.3 | 411.1 | 58.3 | 79 | 27.6 | 342.0 | 39.2 |
| No | 75 | 80.6 | 416.3 | 40 | 45 | 64.3 | 392.8 | 40 | 201 | 70.3 | 316.0 | 32.8 | |
| Number of other children in household | 0 | - | - | 454.2 | 31.3 | - | - | 384.3 | 41.7 | 12 | 4.2 | 375.6 | 50.0 |
| 1 | - | - | 425.0 | 40.4 | - | - | 417.2 | 41.0 | 122 | 42.7 | 340.5 | 28.7 | |
| 2 | - | - | 422.3 | 42.9 | - | - | 383.1 | 58.8 | 124 | 43.4 | 302.5 | 37.1 | |
| >3 | - | - | 355.6 | 44.4 | - | - | 347.9 | 100.0 | 28 | 9.8 | 301.3 | 39.3 | |
| Employment status (both parents work) | Yes | - | - | 414.2 | 36.1 | - | - | 421.4 | 46.0 | 195 | 68.2 | 341 | 32.8 |
| No | - | - | 498.8 | 66.7 | - | - | 220.6 | 57.1 | 88 | 30.8 | 280.3 | 37.5 | |
| Distance (home to school, network distance (km)) | <0.5 km | - | - | 414.8 | 75.0 | - | - | 371.2 | 60.0 | - | - | 276.9 | 63.4 |
| 0.5 to 1 km | - | - | 370.8 | 55.2 | - | - | 338.3 | 48.2 | - | - | 346.8 | 47.4 | |
| 1 to 1.5 km | - | - | 416.4 | 29.6 | - | - | 344.2 | 35.3 | - | - | 327.6 | 7.7 | |
| 1.5 to 2 km | - | - | 444.5 | 10.0 | - | - | 476.9 | 42.9 | - | - | 344.9 | 2.6 | |
| >2 km | - | - | 526.3 | 20.0 | - | - | 672.9 | 47.1 | - | - | 340.6 | 12.5 | |
Notes: The annual household income categories in the Scottish survey correspond with the categories of <180,000, 180,000 HKD to 455,999 and >456,000 HKD in the Hong Kong survey. No narrower categories were appropriate, the GBP-HKD currency conversion corresponded with the exchange rate at the time of the survey (in late 2015 to early 2016). – numbers below 10 suppressed across all categories to avoid potential disclosable information.
Contribution of AST to ALIFE, by city.
| City/Region | Mean proportion of Active School Travel (AST) within children’s active lifestyles (ALIFE) variable | Standard Deviation | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glasgow | 11.1 | 17.3 | 0–80.9 |
| Edinburgh | 18.6 | 27.6 | 0–100 |
| Hong Kong | 13.7 | 25.6 | 0–100 |
City characteristics.
| City | School environment | Home environment (500m) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home-school travel time (mins) | Network distance home-school (metres) | Duration of extra-curricular activities (mins) | Road junctions | Public transit stops | Parking facilities | Sport and play facilities (public only) | Population density (persons per sq. km) | |
| Glasgow | 19.3 | 1545.3 | 354.8 | 89.74 | 6.21 | 0.95 | 24.4 | 4346.46 |
| Edinburgh | 16.4 | 1320.1 | 322.1 | 88.9 | 6.44 | 0.89 | 36.4 | 4190.4 |
| Hong Kong | 18.5 | 3565.9 | 282.9 | 89.27 | 17.4 | 4.78 | 13.9 | 31,756.2 |
Note: Mean values are presented in the table for minutes, metres and number.
Main effects model – effect of individual and neighbourhood characteristics on children’s active lifestyles (ALIFE) (region and city as fixed effect).
| Children’s active lifestyles (ALIFE) | Coefficient |
| LL 95% CI | UL 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Region as fixed effect Region/City | Scotland | Ref | |||
| Hong Kong | −95.13 | 0.00 | −146.09 | −44.17 | |
| Sex | Male | Ref | |||
| Female | −11.09 | 0.62 | −55.18 | 33.00 | |
| Annual household income (thousand GBP) | <20,000 | Ref | |||
| 20–40 | 50.80 | 0.21 | −29.26 | 130.86 | |
| 40+ | 115.26 | 0.00 | 41.68 | 188.83 | |
| (b) City as fixed effect City | Glasgow | Ref | |||
| Edinburgh | −32.29 | 0.45 | −116.88 | 52.29 | |
| HK | −109.36 | 0.00 | −181.13 | −37.59 | |
| Sex | Male | Ref | |||
| Female | −9.85 | 0.68 | −55.93 | 36.24 | |
| Annual household income (thousand GBP) | <20,000 | Ref | |||
| 20–40 | 50.17 | 0.21 | −28.47 | 128.80 | |
| 40+ | 114.95 | 0.00 | 43.55 | 186.34 |
Effect of individual and neighbourhood characteristics on active school travel (AST) (Region as fixed effect).
| Active school travel (AST) | Odds Ratio (OR) |
| LL 95% CI | UL 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region/City | Scotland | Ref | |||
| Hong Kong | 0.52 | 0.03 | 0.29 | 0.93 | |
| Gender | Male | Ref | |||
| Female | 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.61 | 1.54 | |
| Car ownership | No | Ref | |||
| Yes | 0.40 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.76 | |
| Distance from home to school | <0.5 km | Ref | |||
| 0.5 to 1 km | 0.54 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 0.98 | |
| 1 to 1.5 km | 0.11 | <0.001 | 0.06 | 0.24 | |
| 1.5 to 2 km | 0.05 | <0.001 | 0.02 | 0.17 | |
| >2 km | 0.14 | <0.001 | 0.05 | 0.37 | |
| No. public parking facilities (500 m buffer of child residence) | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.97 | |
| Road junction density (500 m buffer of child residence) | 1.01 | <0.001 | 1.01 | 1.02 |
Figure 2Probability of active travel by home to school distance and region.
Figure 3Probability of active travel by number of parking facilities around home.