Shashi Kant1, Khanh-Van Tran2, Miroslava Kvandova3, Amada D Caliz1, Hyung-Jin Yoo1, Heather Learnard2, Ana C Dolan1, Siobhan M Craige4, Joshua D Hall5, Juan M Jiménez5, Cynthia St Hilaire6, Eberhard Schulz7, Swenja Kröller-Schön3, John F Keaney1. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (S.K., A.D.C., H.-J.Y., A.C.D., J.F.K.). 2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (K.-V.T., H.L.). 3. Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany (M.K., S.K.-S.). 4. Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blackburg, VA (S.M.C.). 5. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (J.D.H., J.M.J.). 6. Division of Cardiology, Departments of Medicine and Bioengineering, Pittsburgh Heart, Lung, and Blood Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, PA (C.S.H.). 7. Department of Cardiology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Celle, Germany (E.S.).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Fluid shear stress (FSS) is known to mediate multiple phenotypic changes in the endothelium. Laminar FSS (undisturbed flow) is known to promote endothelial alignment to flow, which is key to stabilizing the endothelium and rendering it resistant to atherosclerosis and thrombosis. The molecular pathways responsible for endothelial responses to FSS are only partially understood. In this study, we determine the role of PGC1α (peroxisome proliferator gamma coactivator-1α)-TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase)-HMOX1 (heme oxygenase-1) during shear stress in vitro and in vivo. Approach and Results: Here, we have identified PGC1α as a flow-responsive gene required for endothelial flow alignment in vitro and in vivo. Compared with oscillatory FSS (disturbed flow) or static conditions, laminar FSS (undisturbed flow) showed increased PGC1α expression and its transcriptional coactivation. PGC1α was required for laminar FSS-induced expression of TERT in vitro and in vivo via its association with ERRα(estrogen-related receptor alpha) and KLF (Kruppel-like factor)-4 on the TERT promoter. We found that TERT inhibition attenuated endothelial flow alignment, elongation, and nuclear polarization in response to laminar FSS in vitro and in vivo. Among the flow-responsive genes sensitive to TERT status, HMOX1 was required for endothelial alignment to laminar FSS. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest an important role for a PGC1α-TERT-HMOX1 axis in the endothelial stabilization response to laminar FSS.
OBJECTIVE: Fluid shear stress (FSS) is known to mediate multiple phenotypic changes in the endothelium. Laminar FSS (undisturbed flow) is known to promote endothelial alignment to flow, which is key to stabilizing the endothelium and rendering it resistant to atherosclerosis and thrombosis. The molecular pathways responsible for endothelial responses to FSS are only partially understood. In this study, we determine the role of PGC1α (peroxisome proliferator gamma coactivator-1α)-TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase)-HMOX1 (heme oxygenase-1) during shear stress in vitro and in vivo. Approach and Results: Here, we have identified PGC1α as a flow-responsive gene required for endothelial flow alignment in vitro and in vivo. Compared with oscillatory FSS (disturbed flow) or static conditions, laminar FSS (undisturbed flow) showed increased PGC1α expression and its transcriptional coactivation. PGC1α was required for laminar FSS-induced expression of TERT in vitro and in vivo via its association with ERRα(estrogen-related receptor alpha) and KLF (Kruppel-like factor)-4 on the TERT promoter. We found that TERT inhibition attenuated endothelial flow alignment, elongation, and nuclear polarization in response to laminar FSS in vitro and in vivo. Among the flow-responsive genes sensitive to TERT status, HMOX1 was required for endothelial alignment to laminar FSS. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest an important role for a PGC1α-TERT-HMOX1 axis in the endothelial stabilization response to laminar FSS.
Authors: Shiqin Xiong; Nikolay Patrushev; Farshad Forouzandeh; Lula Hilenski; R Wayne Alexander Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Aruna Poduri; Andrew H Chang; Brian Raftrey; Siyeon Rhee; Mike Van; Kristy Red-Horse Journal: Development Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Brian G Coon; Nicolas Baeyens; Jinah Han; Madhusudhan Budatha; Tyler D Ross; Jennifer S Fang; Sanguk Yun; Jeon-Leon Thomas; Martin A Schwartz Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Andreas M Beyer; Julie K Freed; Matthew J Durand; Michael Riedel; Karima Ait-Aissa; Paula Green; Joseph C Hockenberry; R Garret Morgan; Anthony J Donato; Refael Peleg; Mario Gasparri; Chris K Rokkas; Janine H Santos; Esther Priel; David D Gutterman Journal: Circ Res Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Brian G Coon; Sushma Timalsina; Matteo Astone; Zhen W Zhuang; Jennifer Fang; Jinah Han; Jurgen Themen; Minhwan Chung; Young Joo Yang-Klingler; Mukesh Jain; Karen K Hirschi; Ai Yamamato; Louis-Eric Trudeau; Massimo Santoro; Martin A Schwartz Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 8.077