Reza N Sahlan1, Ani C Keshishian2, Caroline Christian2, Cheri A Levinson3. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. 3. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. cheri.levinson@louisville.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Network studies of eating disorder (ED) symptoms have identified central and bridge symptoms in Western samples, yet few network models of ED symptoms have been tested in non-Western samples, especially among preadolescents. The current study tested a network model of ED symptoms in Iranian preadolescents (ages 9 to 13), as well as a model of co-occurring social anxiety disorder (SAD) and ED symptoms. METHOD: Preadolescent boys (n = 405) and girls (n = 325) completed the Children Eating Attitudes Test-20 and Social Anxiety Scale for Children. We estimated two network models (ED and ED/SAD networks) and identified central and bridge symptoms, as well as tested if these models differed by sex. RESULTS: We found that discomfort eating sweets were the most central symptoms in ED networks. Concern over being judged was central in networks including both ED and SAD symptoms. Additionally, concern over being judged was the strongest bridge symptoms. Networks did not differ by sex. CONCLUSION: Future research is needed to test if interventions focused on bridge symptoms (i.e., concern over being judged) as primary intervention points target comorbid ED-SAD pathology in preadolescents at risk for ED and SAD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Evidence obtained from well-designed observational study, including case-control design for relevant aspects of the study.
PURPOSE: Network studies of eating disorder (ED) symptoms have identified central and bridge symptoms in Western samples, yet few network models of ED symptoms have been tested in non-Western samples, especially among preadolescents. The current study tested a network model of ED symptoms in Iranian preadolescents (ages 9 to 13), as well as a model of co-occurring social anxiety disorder (SAD) and ED symptoms. METHOD: Preadolescent boys (n = 405) and girls (n = 325) completed the Children Eating Attitudes Test-20 and Social Anxiety Scale for Children. We estimated two network models (ED and ED/SAD networks) and identified central and bridge symptoms, as well as tested if these models differed by sex. RESULTS: We found that discomfort eating sweets were the most central symptoms in ED networks. Concern over being judged was central in networks including both ED and SAD symptoms. Additionally, concern over being judged was the strongest bridge symptoms. Networks did not differ by sex. CONCLUSION: Future research is needed to test if interventions focused on bridge symptoms (i.e., concern over being judged) as primary intervention points target comorbid ED-SAD pathology in preadolescents at risk for ED and SAD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Evidence obtained from well-designed observational study, including case-control design for relevant aspects of the study.
Authors: Susan M Sawyer; Rima A Afifi; Linda H Bearinger; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Bruce Dick; Alex C Ezeh; George C Patton Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: K Bühren; R Schwarte; F Fluck; N Timmesfeld; M Krei; K Egberts; E Pfeiffer; C Fleischhaker; C Wewetzer; B Herpertz-Dahlmann Journal: Eur Eat Disord Rev Date: 2013-09-12
Authors: Jessica Swinbourne; Caroline Hunt; Maree Abbott; Janice Russell; Tamsen St Clare; Stephen Touyz Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Klaus Ranta; Juha Väänänen; Sari Fröjd; Rasmus Isomaa; Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino; Mauri Marttunen Journal: Nord J Psychiatry Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 2.202
Authors: Kathryn E Smith; Tyler B Mason; Rachel C Leonard; Chad T Wetterneck; Brad E R Smith; Nicholas R Farrell; Brad C Riemann Journal: Eat Disord Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.222