Literature DB >> 34786738

RIF1 and KAP1 differentially regulate the choice of inactive versus active X chromosomes.

Elin Enervald1,2, Lynn Marie Powell1, Lora Boteva1, Rossana Foti2, Nerea Blanes Ruiz3, Gözde Kibar4, Agnieszka Piszczek2, Fatima Cavaleri2, Martin Vingron4, Andrea Cerase3, Sara B C Buonomo1,2.   

Abstract

The onset of random X chromosome inactivation in mouse requires the switch from a symmetric to an asymmetric state, where the identities of the future inactive and active X chromosomes are assigned. This process is known as X chromosome choice. Here, we show that RIF1 and KAP1 are two fundamental factors for the definition of this transcriptional asymmetry. We found that at the onset of differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), biallelic up-regulation of the long non-coding RNA Tsix weakens the symmetric association of RIF1 with the Xist promoter. The Xist allele maintaining the association with RIF1 goes on to up-regulate Xist RNA expression in a RIF1-dependent manner. Conversely, the promoter that loses RIF1 gains binding of KAP1, and KAP1 is required for the increase in Tsix levels preceding the choice. We propose that the mutual exclusion of Tsix and RIF1, and of RIF1 and KAP1, at the Xist promoters establish a self-sustaining loop that transforms an initially stochastic event into a stably inherited asymmetric X-chromosome state.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KAP1; RIF1; Tsix; X chromosome inactivation; Xist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34786738      PMCID: PMC8672179          DOI: 10.15252/embj.2020105862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  94 in total

1.  Establishment of expression-state boundaries by Rif1 and Taz1 in fission yeast.

Authors:  Tea Toteva; Bethany Mason; Yutaka Kanoh; Peter Brøgger; Daniel Green; Janne Verhein-Hansen; Hisao Masai; Geneviève Thon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A transcription factor-based mechanism for mouse heterochromatin formation.

Authors:  Aydan Bulut-Karslioglu; Valentina Perrera; Manuela Scaranaro; Inti Alberto de la Rosa-Velazquez; Suzanne van de Nobelen; Nicholas Shukeir; Johannes Popow; Borbala Gerle; Susanne Opravil; Michaela Pagani; Simone Meidhof; Thomas Brabletz; Thomas Manke; Monika Lachner; Thomas Jenuwein
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  Primary non-random X inactivation associated with disruption of Xist promoter regulation.

Authors:  A E Newall; S Duthie; E Formstone; T Nesterova; M Alexiou; C Johnston; M L Caparros; N Brockdorff
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Dosage Sensing, Threshold Responses, and Epigenetic Memory: A Systems Biology Perspective on Random X-Chromosome Inactivation.

Authors:  Verena Mutzel; Edda G Schulz
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  RNF12 is an X-Encoded dose-dependent activator of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Iris Jonkers; Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Eskeatnaf Mulugeta Achame; Kim Monkhorst; Annegien Kenter; Eveline Rentmeester; Frank Grosveld; J Anton Grootegoed; Joost Gribnau
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Phosphorylation at Ser473 regulates heterochromatin protein 1 binding and corepressor function of TIF1beta/KAP1.

Authors:  Chiung-Wen Chang; Han-Yi Chou; Yu-Sheng Lin; Kuo-Hsiang Huang; Ching-Jin Chang; Tsui-Chun Hsu; Sheng-Chung Lee
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.946

7.  Rif1 promotes a repressive chromatin state to safeguard against endogenous retrovirus activation.

Authors:  Pishun Li; Li Wang; Brian D Bennett; Jiajia Wang; Jialun Li; Yufeng Qin; Motoki Takaku; Paul A Wade; Jiemin Wong; Guang Hu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Rif1 controls DNA replication by directing Protein Phosphatase 1 to reverse Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation of the MCM complex.

Authors:  Shin-Ichiro Hiraga; Gina M Alvino; Fujung Chang; Hui-Yong Lian; Akila Sridhar; Takashi Kubota; Bonita J Brewer; Michael Weinreich; M K Raghuraman; Anne D Donaldson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  RLIM is dispensable for X-chromosome inactivation in the mouse embryonic epiblast.

Authors:  JongDae Shin; Mary C Wallingford; Judith Gallant; Chelsea Marcho; Baowei Jiao; Meg Byron; Michael Bossenz; Jeanne B Lawrence; Stephen N Jones; Jesse Mager; Ingolf Bach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Individual retrotransposon integrants are differentially controlled by KZFP/KAP1-dependent histone methylation, DNA methylation and TET-mediated hydroxymethylation in naïve embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Andrea Coluccio; Gabriela Ecco; Julien Duc; Sandra Offner; Priscilla Turelli; Didier Trono
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.954

View more
  2 in total

1.  RIF1 and KAP1 differentially regulate the choice of inactive versus active X chromosomes.

Authors:  Elin Enervald; Lynn Marie Powell; Lora Boteva; Rossana Foti; Nerea Blanes Ruiz; Gözde Kibar; Agnieszka Piszczek; Fatima Cavaleri; Martin Vingron; Andrea Cerase; Sara B C Buonomo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Mechanisms of Choice in X-Chromosome Inactivation.

Authors:  Giulia Furlan; Rafael Galupa
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.