Literature DB >> 34785871

Range of Pulmonary Autograft Responses to Systemic Pressure Immediately After Ross Procedure.

Andrew D Wisneski1, Zhongjie Wang1, Yue Xuan1, Julius M Guccione1, Liang Ge1, Elaine E Tseng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary autograft dilatation after Ross operation often necessitates reoperation. To understand autograft remodeling, a biomechanical understanding of human autografts after exposure to systemic pressure is required. We previously developed an ex vivo human pulmonary autograft finite element (FE) model to predict wall stress after exposure to systemic pressure. However, autograft material properties vary significantly among individuals. Our study aim was to quantify range of wall stress changes in a human autograft after Ross operation prior to remodeling based upon normal variation in human autograft mechanical properties.
METHODS: A normal human autograft FE model was loaded to pulmonary and systemic arterial pressures. Stress-strain data of normal human autografts (n=24) were incorporated into an Ogden hyper-elastic model to describe autograft mechanical behavior. Autograft wall stresses at pulmonary vs. systemic pressures were examined. Autograft volume-based stress analysis was performed, based on percentage of autograft element volume exceeding 1 standard deviation (SD) above group mean stress at systemic systole.
RESULTS: Mean first principal wall stresses (FPS) at systole of systemic versus pulmonary pressures were 129.29±17.47kPa versus 24.42±3.85kPa (p<0.001) at the annulus, 187.53±20.06kPa versus 35.98±2.15kPa at sinuses (p<0.001), and 268.68±23.40kPa versus 50.15±5.90kPa (p<0.001) at sinotubuluar junction (STJ). The percentage of autograft element volume that exceeded one SD above the group mean was 14.3±5.6% for FPS and 12.6±10.1% for second principal stresses.
CONCLUSION: We quantified normal human autograft biomechanical responses to systemic pressure based on patient-specific material properties. Regions of peak stresses were observed in autograft sinuses and STJ regions, which corresponded clinically to locations of autograft dilation. Our results provide valuable information on predicting variations in patient-specific ex vivo FE models when population-based material properties are used in settings where patient-specific properties are unknown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ross procedure; autograft dilatation; finite element analysis; pulmonary autograft

Year:  2019        PMID: 34785871      PMCID: PMC8592523     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  34 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Zeynep Eryigit; Louis-Mathieu Stevens; Zubair Sarang; Robert George; Lucy Clark; Giovanni Melina; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Finite element modeling of the pulmonary autograft at systemic pressure before remodeling.

Authors:  Peter B Matthews; Choon-Sik Jhun; Stephanie Yaung; Ali N Azadani; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2011-01

3.  Introducing bioresorbable scaffolds into the show. A potential adjunct to resuscitate Ross procedure.

Authors:  Cristiano Spadaccio; Stefania Montagnani; Christophe Acar; Francesco Nappi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  The Ross procedure: biomechanical properties of the pulmonary artery according to aortic valve phenotype.

Authors:  Pierre Olivier Dionne; Evan Wener; Alexander Emmott; Raymond Cartier; Rosaire Mongrain; Richard Leask; Ismail El-Hamamsy
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-30

5.  Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure in adults with severe aortic stenosis: single-centre experience with 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  David Kalfa; Siamak Mohammadi; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis; Mounir Kharroubi; Daniel Doyle; Mohamed Marzouk; Jacques Metras; Jean Perron
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Longitudinal strain of canine and porcine aortas.

Authors:  H C Han; Y C Fung
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The Ross procedure using autologous support of the pulmonary autograft: techniques and late results.

Authors:  Peter D Skillington; M Mostafa Mokhles; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Marco Larobina; Michael O'Keefe; Rochelle Wynne; James Tatoulis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  The Ross procedure: time for a hard look at current practices and a reexamination of the guidelines.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Ismail Bouhout
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

9.  Impact of Patient-Specific Material Properties on Aneurysm Wall Stress: Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Zhongjie Wang; Yue Xuan; Julius M Guccione; Elaine E Tseng; Liang Ge
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2018

10.  Results of the Ross procedure in adults: a single-centre experience of 741 operations.

Authors:  Alexander Karaskov; Ravil Sharifulin; Sergey Zheleznev; Igor Demin; Evgeny Lenko; Alexander Bogachev-Prokophiev
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.