| Literature DB >> 34785690 |
Angela Capaccio1, Antonio Sasso1,2, Giulia Rusciano3,4.
Abstract
The fabrication of plasmonic nanostructures with a reliable, low cost and easy approach has become a crucial and urgent challenge in many fields, including surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) based applications. In this frame, nanoporous metal films are quite attractive, due to their intrinsic large surface area and high density of metal nanogaps, acting as hot-spots for Raman signal enhancement. In this paper, we report a detailed study on the fabrication of nanoporous silver-based SERS substrates, obtained by the application of two successive treatments with an Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) system, using synthetic air and Ar as feeding gases. The obtained substrates exhibit a quite broad plasmonic response, covering the Vis-NIR range, and an enhancement factor reaching 6.5 [Formula: see text], estimated by using 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) as probe molecule at 532 nm. Moreover, the substrates exhibit a quite good spatial reproducibility on a centimeter scale, which assures a good signal stability for analytical measurements. Globally, the developed protocol is easy and cost effective, potentially usable also for mass production thanks to the remarkable inter-batches reproducibility. As such, it holds promise for its use in SERS-based sensing platforms for sensitive detection of targets molecules.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34785690 PMCID: PMC8595463 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01727-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Emission spectrum of the air-based plasma used to induce the silver layer nanostructuring, obtained at an air pressure = 0.4 Torr and a RF power = 18 W. The peak highlighted by the pink bar is due to atomic oxygen and it was used for monitoring the formation of this species. The inset reports a picture of the plasma discharge, exhibiting a pink-orange color following atomic oxygen production optimization. (b) Intensity of the O peak at 844.6 nm vs , obtained at = 18 W. (c) Raman spectrum of a 30 nm Ag layer treated in air-plasma for 90 s; it was obtained by using a power of P = 70 W and an integration time of 100 s. The inset shows the Raman map corresponding to the integrated intensity of the peak at 423 cm (highlighted in the spectrum by the pink bar) acquired over a 20 20 m region with a 1 m step. The Raman probe power and the integration time were 0.5 mW and 2 s, respectively. (d) Emission spectrum of the plasma, obtained by using Ar as feeding gas at a pressure = 0.4 Torr and = 18 W. The inset shows a picture of such plasma. (e) Intensity of the Ar peak at 811.5 nm vs , obtained at = 18 W. (f) Evolution of the AgO peak at 423 cm at different .
Figure 2SEM images of SERS substrates covered by a (a) 10 nm, (b) 30 nm, (c) 50 nm and (d) 200 nm Ag layer and treated for 90 s with the air-based plasma and for 50 s with the Ar-based plasma (scale bar = 1 m). The insets in the upper right corners show the magnification of the SEM image (scale bar = 500 nm), whereas, the insets in the lower left corners show the PSD.
Surface parameters obtained by varying at fixed = 90 s (left part) and by varying at fixed = 30 nm (right part).
| Ag thickness (nm) | Exposure time (s) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||||||
| 10 | 30 | 50 | 200 | 90 | 120 | 180 | |
| 88 (64, 118) | 109 (71, 141) | 135 (92, 168) | 168 (92, 219) | 109 (71, 141) | 111 (84, 131) | 126 (81, 163) | |
*Errors on result from the fitting with a Lorentzian function.
**Median (lower quartile, upper quartile).
Figure 3(a) Comparison between the spontaneous Raman and SERS spectrum of 4-MBA. The first signal was obtained at a 0.1 M concentration, while the Raman probe power and the integration time were = 15 mW and = 2 s, respectively. SERS spectrum is the average of 400 signals obtained in a raster scan of a 10 m 10 m region. Each spectrum of the scan was acquired by using a probe power = 10 W and an integration time = 1 s. The pink bar highlights the spectral band used to estimate the EF. It is worth noticing that the 4-MBA peak selected for the EF estimation is free from interferences from the solvent. (b) Diffuse reflectance curve relative to the substrate obtained by using = 30 nm and = 90 s.
EF values obtained with = 30 nm and different .
| EF | |
|---|---|
| 60 | ( |
| 90 | ( |
| 120 | ( |
| 150 | ( |
| 180 | ( |
The standard deviations correspond to repeated measurements on substrates from 5 different production batches.
Figure 4(a) Percentage variability / observed in 36.50 m 50 m maps uniformly distributed in a 6.25 mm square area . (b) Distribution of values obtained from 36 maps, together with the data fitting with a Gaussian curve.
Figure 5(a) SERS signal intensity vs the substrate storage time. The signals were normalized to the value observed at t = 0. The graph also reports a fit of the data with an exponential decay curve. (b) SERS signals from an initially clean substrate, following exposure to room environment. The exposure times are indicated by the labels. (c) SCA values vs the exposure time to room air. The insets show images of a 2 L drop deposited on the substrate, from which the SCA was obtained.