Literature DB >> 34784938

Effects of levosimendan on occurrence of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a case-control study.

Antoine Trinh-Duc1,2, Marc-Antoine Labeyrie3,4, Anaïs Caillard1,2, Wagih Ben Hassen5, Alexandre Mebazaa1,2, Benjamin Glenn Chousterman6,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral vasospasm; Delayed cerebral ischemia; Levosimendan; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34784938      PMCID: PMC8597255          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03824-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor,

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a common complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) contributing to poor prognosis [1]. Macro-vascular dysfunction related to cerebral vasospasm (CVS) remains the main pathophysiological hypothesis and therapeutic target of DCI [2]. No preventive treatment for CVS has yet proven to be effective [3]. Levosimendan, a non-adrenergic calcium-sensitizing inotrope, has been used to treat neurogenic stress-induced cardiomyopathy (NSIC) related to aSAH. Only few cases of patients treated with levosimendan for NSIC related to aSAH have been reported and have suggested that levosimendan could be associated with hemodynamic and neurological improvement [4]. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of levosimendan as a therapy targeting occurrence of CVS in a cohort of patients admitted in ICU for aSAH. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients admitted to the Lariboisière Hospital Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (Paris, France) for an aSAH and treated with levosimendan during the first 48 h after ICU admission in order to treat neurogenic stress-induced cardiomyopathy (NSIC) secondary to aSAH (“Levo”) defined as an elevation of circulating troponin. We matched with a 1:2 ratio all Levo patients to patients that were not treated with levosimendan. Matching was performed on age, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade, Fischer grade, need for external ventricular derivation (EVD) and severity assessed by Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II). We excluded patients who died or had treatment withholding or withdrawal within the first four days following the bleeding. Levosimendan was administered intravenously as a continuous infusion over 24 h at a 0.1 μg/kg/min dose. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of occurrence of CVS defined as vessel narrowing higher than 50% requiring angioplasty and/or associated with DCI. DCI was defined according to Vergouwen et al. [5] Secondary outcomes included occurrence of DCI, 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) and variation of the cerebral arteries diameters between days 5–7 and day 1. Between January 2018 and May 2020, a total of 652 patients were admitted for aSAH in our institution, and 18 Levo patients and 36 controls could be included in the study. The characteristics and outcomes of the 54 included patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics, management and outcome for levosimendan cases and non-levosimendan controls

Cases (“Levo”)a(n = 18)Controlsb(n = 36)P-valueOdds-Ratio
Patients characteristics
Age—median (IQR)—years61 (50–70)61,5 (52–68)0.63
Female—No (%)15 (83.3)30 (83.3)1.00
Arterial hypertension—No (%)6 (33.3)17 (47.2)0.39
Smoking—No (%)10 (55.6)10 (27.8)0.07
Diabetes—No (%)0 (0)1 (2.8)1.00
Stroke history—No (%)2 (11.1)4 (11.1)1.00
SAPS 2—median (IQR)60 (43; 65)49 (40; 57)0.15
SOFA—median (IQR)8 (7; 11)6 (2; 9)0.03
Characteristic of SAH
WFNS grade—median (IQR)5 (4; 5)4 (4; 5)0.43
Fischer grade—median (IQR)4 (4; 4)4 (4; 4)0.48
Coiling—No (%)16 (88.9)32 (88.9)1.00
External ventricular drainage—No (%)7 (38.9)23 (63.9)0.09
Decompressive craniectomy—No (%)2 (11.1)3 (8.3)1.00
Cardiac impairmentc
Cardiac troponin peak—median (IQR)—ng/L

3999

(2210; 7382)

821

(40; 4532)

0.007
BNP peak—median (IQR)—ng/L

1122

(762; 1718)

138

(65; 937)

0.001
Outcome
Cerebral vasospasm—No (%)5 (27.8)24 (66.7)0.009

0.199

[0.0443; 0.766]

Delayed cerebral ischemia—No (%)0 (0)7 (19.4)0.08NA
MRS at 3 months ≤ 3—No (%)11 (61.1)18 (50)0.57

1.558

[0.4331; 5.922]

Death at 3 months—No (%)1 (5.6)9 (25)0.14

0.181

[0.004; 1.516]

Characteristics of patients are compared with Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables

BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; MRS, modified Rankin score; NA, not available; SAPS2, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2; SOFA, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies

aNo missing data

bMissing data: arterial hypertension status for one patient, smoking status for one patient, diabetes status for one patient, stroke history for one patient, SOFA for six patients, type of aneurysmal securization for one patient, cardiac troponin peak for four patients, BNP peak for ten patients, use of norepinephrine for two patients

Characteristics, management and outcome for levosimendan cases and non-levosimendan controls 3999 (2210; 7382) 821 (40; 4532) 1122 (762; 1718) 138 (65; 937) 0.199 [0.0443; 0.766] 1.558 [0.4331; 5.922] 0.181 [0.004; 1.516] Characteristics of patients are compared with Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; MRS, modified Rankin score; NA, not available; SAPS2, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2; SOFA, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies aNo missing data bMissing data: arterial hypertension status for one patient, smoking status for one patient, diabetes status for one patient, stroke history for one patient, SOFA for six patients, type of aneurysmal securization for one patient, cardiac troponin peak for four patients, BNP peak for ten patients, use of norepinephrine for two patients Considering the primary outcome of the study, the rate of CVS was lower in patients treated with levosimendan compared to the control group (5/18 (28%) vs 24/36 (67%), respectively, p = 0.009). There was no brain infarction related to CVS in the Levo group, but the difference with the control did not reach statistical significance (0/18 (0%) vs 7/36 (19%) for the Levo vs control groups, respectively, p = 0.08). There was no association between levosimendan administration and mRS at 3 months (OR 1.56 [0.43;5.92]; p = 0.56) neither for mortality at 3 months (OR 0.18 [0.00; 1.52]; p = 0.14). Regarding evolution of vessels diameters, we observed a slight increase in the median cerebral arteries diameters between D0 and D5–7 (0.03 mm (IQR [− 0.01; 0.06])) in the Levo group, while cerebral arteries showed signs of vasospasm with a decreasing diameter in the control group (− 0.47 mm (IQR [− 0.51; − 0.24]) (p = 0.002; Fig. 1). Characteristics of the patients included in this analysis did not differ.
Fig. 1

Mean vessels diameters variations between day 1 and days 5–7 in levosimendan treated vs control patients. Quantitative analysis of cerebral arteries diameters in patients who had vessel imaging (CT or angiography) at admission and at days 5–7 in nine levosimendan-treated patients and 18 controls. Vessels narrowing was more pronounced in controls compared to levosimendan-treated patients (P = 0.004)

Mean vessels diameters variations between day 1 and days 5–7 in levosimendan treated vs control patients. Quantitative analysis of cerebral arteries diameters in patients who had vessel imaging (CT or angiography) at admission and at days 5–7 in nine levosimendan-treated patients and 18 controls. Vessels narrowing was more pronounced in controls compared to levosimendan-treated patients (P = 0.004) We found an association between the administration of levosimendan and a reduced incidence of CVS. Our study presents several limitations including its retrospective and non-randomized design that may induce several biases. Cardiac impairment was more frequent in the Levo group, since NSIC is associated with occurrence of CVS [6]; this argues in favor of a positive impact of levosimendan. Our results suggest that levosimendan could represent a therapeutic candidate for early prevention of cerebral vasospasm secondary to aSAH.
  6 in total

1.  Levosimendan in cardiac failure after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Stefano Busani; Laura Rinaldi; Claudia Severino; Milena Cobelli; Alberto Pasetto; Massimo Girardis
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-05

Review 2.  A Review of the Management of Cerebral Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Kenny Li; Christen D Barras; Ronil V Chandra; Hong K Kok; Julian T Maingard; Nicole S Carter; Jeremy H Russell; Leon Lai; Mark Brooks; Hamed Asadi
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 3.  Impact of echocardiographic wall motion abnormality and cardiac biomarker elevation on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Limin Zhang; Bing Zhang; Sihua Qi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group.

Authors:  Mervyn D I Vergouwen; Marinus Vermeulen; Jan van Gijn; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Eelco F Wijdicks; J Paul Muizelaar; A David Mendelow; Seppo Juvela; Howard Yonas; Karel G Terbrugge; R Loch Macdonald; Michael N Diringer; Joseph P Broderick; Jens P Dreier; Yvo B W E M Roos
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Delayed neurological deterioration after subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Delayed Cerebral Infarction is Systematically Associated with a Cerebral Vasospasm of Large Intracranial Arteries.

Authors:  Jonathan Brami; Benjamin Chousterman; Grégoire Boulouis; Matthieu Le Dorze; Melinda Majlath; Jean-Pierre Saint-Maurice; Vittorio Civelli; Sébastien Froelich; Emmanuel Houdart; Marc-Antoine Labeyrie
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.