Literature DB >> 34784540

Selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancers via CorrSigNIA: an MRI-pathology correlation and deep learning framework.

Indrani Bhattacharya1, Arun Seetharaman2, Christian Kunder3, Wei Shao4, Leo C Chen5, Simon J C Soerensen6, Jeffrey B Wang4, Nikola C Teslovich5, Richard E Fan5, Pejman Ghanouni7, James D Brooks5, Geoffrey A Sonn8, Mirabela Rusu9.   

Abstract

Automated methods for detecting prostate cancer and distinguishing indolent from aggressive disease on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could assist in early diagnosis and treatment planning. Existing automated methods of prostate cancer detection mostly rely on ground truth labels with limited accuracy, ignore disease pathology characteristics observed on resected tissue, and cannot selectively identify aggressive (Gleason Pattern≥4) and indolent (Gleason Pattern=3) cancers when they co-exist in mixed lesions. In this paper, we present a radiology-pathology fusion approach, CorrSigNIA, for the selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancer on MRI. CorrSigNIA uses registered MRI and whole-mount histopathology images from radical prostatectomy patients to derive accurate ground truth labels and learn correlated features between radiology and pathology images. These correlated features are then used in a convolutional neural network architecture to detect and localize normal tissue, indolent cancer, and aggressive cancer on prostate MRI. CorrSigNIA was trained and validated on a dataset of 98 men, including 74 men that underwent radical prostatectomy and 24 men with normal prostate MRI. CorrSigNIA was tested on three independent test sets including 55 men that underwent radical prostatectomy, 275 men that underwent targeted biopsies, and 15 men with normal prostate MRI. CorrSigNIA achieved an accuracy of 80% in distinguishing between men with and without cancer, a lesion-level ROC-AUC of 0.81±0.31 in detecting cancers in both radical prostatectomy and biopsy cohort patients, and lesion-levels ROC-AUCs of 0.82±0.31 and 0.86±0.26 in detecting clinically significant cancers in radical prostatectomy and biopsy cohort patients respectively. CorrSigNIA consistently outperformed other methods across different evaluation metrics and cohorts. In clinical settings, CorrSigNIA may be used in prostate cancer detection as well as in selective identification of indolent and aggressive components of prostate cancer, thereby improving prostate cancer care by helping guide targeted biopsies, reducing unnecessary biopsies, and selecting and planning treatment.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnosis; Correlated feature learning; Prostate cancer; Radiology-pathology fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34784540      PMCID: PMC8678366          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  42 in total

1.  Correlational Neural Networks.

Authors:  Sarath Chandar; Mitesh M Khapra; Hugo Larochelle; Balaraman Ravindran
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Joint Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Score Prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet.

Authors:  Ruiming Cao; Amirhossein Mohammadian Bajgiran; Sohrab Afshari Mirak; Sepideh Shakeri; Xinran Zhong; Dieter Enzmann; Steven Raman; Kyunghyun Sung
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Automated prostate cancer detection using T2-weighted and high-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin Tae Kwak; Sheng Xu; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto; Shijun Wang; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.

Authors:  Wouter Bulten; Hans Pinckaers; Hester van Boven; Robert Vink; Thomas de Bel; Bram van Ginneken; Jeroen van der Laak; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Geert Litjens
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Underestimation of Prostate Cancer Geometry: Use of Patient Specific Molds to Correlate Images with Whole Mount Pathology.

Authors:  Alan Priester; Shyam Natarajan; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Daniel J Margolis; Steven S Raman; Robert E Reiter; Jiaoti Huang; Warren Grundfest; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization.

Authors:  L G Nyúl; J K Udupa; X Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  An Automated Two-step Pipeline for Aggressive Prostate Lesion Detection from Multi-parametric MR Sequence.

Authors:  Josh Sanyal; Imon Banerjee; Lewis Hahn; Daniel Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2020-05-30

8.  Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment.

Authors:  Patrick Schelb; Simon Kohl; Jan Philipp Radtke; Manuel Wiesenfarth; Philipp Kickingereder; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Tristan Anselm Kuder; Albrecht Stenzinger; Markus Hohenfellner; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Klaus H Maier-Hein; David Bonekamp
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Sadhna Verma; Harriet C Thoeny; Clare M Tempany; Faina Shtern; Anwar R Padhani; Daniel Margolis; Katarzyna J Macura; Masoom A Haider; Francois Cornud; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Automated detection of aggressive and indolent prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Arun Seetharaman; Indrani Bhattacharya; Leo C Chen; Christian A Kunder; Wei Shao; Simon J C Soerensen; Jeffrey B Wang; Nikola C Teslovich; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; James D Brooks; Katherine J Too; Geoffrey A Sonn; Mirabela Rusu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  Computational Detection of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Ştefania L Moroianu; Indrani Bhattacharya; Arun Seetharaman; Wei Shao; Christian A Kunder; Avishkar Sharma; Pejman Ghanouni; Richard E Fan; Geoffrey A Sonn; Mirabela Rusu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Predictive Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marina Triquell; Miriam Campistol; Ana Celma; Lucas Regis; Mercè Cuadras; Jacques Planas; Enrique Trilla; Juan Morote
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; David S Lim; Han Lin Aung; Xingchen Liu; Arun Seetharaman; Christian A Kunder; Wei Shao; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Katherine J To'o; James D Brooks; Geoffrey A Sonn; Mirabela Rusu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 4.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.