Literature DB >> 30835218

Joint Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Score Prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet.

Ruiming Cao, Amirhossein Mohammadian Bajgiran, Sohrab Afshari Mirak, Sepideh Shakeri, Xinran Zhong, Dieter Enzmann, Steven Raman, Kyunghyun Sung.   

Abstract

Multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI) is considered the best non-invasive imaging modality for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). However, mp-MRI for PCa diagnosis is currently limited by the qualitative or semi-quantitative interpretation criteria, leading to inter-reader variability and a suboptimal ability to assess lesion aggressiveness. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a powerful method to automatically learn the discriminative features for various tasks, including cancer detection. We propose a novel multi-class CNN, FocalNet, to jointly detect PCa lesions and predict their aggressiveness using Gleason score (GS). FocalNet characterizes lesion aggressiveness and fully utilizes distinctive knowledge from mp-MRI. We collected a prostate mp-MRI dataset from 417 patients who underwent 3T mp-MRI exams prior to robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. FocalNet was trained and evaluated in this large study cohort with fivefold cross validation. In the free-response receiver operating characteristics (FROC) analysis for lesion detection, FocalNet achieved 89.7% and 87.9% sensitivity for index lesions and clinically significant lesions at one false positive per patient, respectively. For the GS classification, evaluated by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, FocalNet received the area under the curve of 0.81 and 0.79 for the classifications of clinically significant PCa (GS ≥ 3 + 4) and PCa with GS ≥ 4 + 3, respectively. With the comparison to the prospective performance of radiologists using the current diagnostic guideline, FocalNet demonstrated comparable detection sensitivity for index lesions and clinically significant lesions, only 3.4% and 1.5% lower than highly experienced radiologists without statistical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30835218     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2901928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  30 in total

1.  How AI is improving cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Neil Savage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancers via CorrSigNIA: an MRI-pathology correlation and deep learning framework.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Arun Seetharaman; Christian Kunder; Wei Shao; Leo C Chen; Simon J C Soerensen; Jeffrey B Wang; Nikola C Teslovich; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; James D Brooks; Geoffrey A Sonn; Mirabela Rusu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Adversarial training for prostate cancer classification using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lei Hu; Da-Wei Zhou; Xiang-Yu Guo; Wen-Hao Xu; Li-Ming Wei; Jun-Gong Zhao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

5.  Performance of Deep Learning and Genitourinary Radiologists in Detection of Prostate Cancer Using 3-T Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ruiming Cao; Xinran Zhong; Sohrab Afshari; Ely Felker; Voraparee Suvannarerg; Teeravut Tubtawee; Sitaram Vangala; Fabien Scalzo; Steven Raman; Kyunghyun Sung
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in oncological imaging.

Authors:  H M C Cheung; D Rubin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.389

7.  Integrative Machine Learning Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Results From Negative Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Haoxin Zheng; Qi Miao; Yongkai Liu; Steven S Raman; Fabien Scalzo; Kyunghyun Sung
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Semi-automated PIRADS scoring via mpMRI analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil J Dhinagar; William Speier; Karthik V Sarma; Alex Raman; Adam Kinnaird; Steven S Raman; Leonard S Marks; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jasper J Twilt; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Henkjan J Huisman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maarten de Rooij
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26

10.  A Comprehensive Study of Data Augmentation Strategies for Prostate Cancer Detection in Diffusion-Weighted MRI Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Ruqian Hao; Khashayar Namdar; Lin Liu; Masoom A Haider; Farzad Khalvati
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.