| Literature DB >> 34783311 |
Shatha Alharazy1, M Denise Robertson2, Susan Lanham-New2, Muhammad Imran Naseer3,4, Adeel G Chaudhary3,4,5, Eman Alissa6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measurement of free 25-hydroyvitamin D (25(OH)D) status has been suggested as a more representative marker of vitamin D status than that of total 25(OH)D. Previously, free 25(OH)D could only be calculated indirectly; however, a newly developed direct assay for the measurement of free 25(OH)D is now available. The aim of this study therefore was to investigate directly measured total and free vitamin D levels association with metabolic health in postmenopausal healthy women living in Saudi Arabia.Entities:
Keywords: Saudi Arabia; free 25-hydroxyvitamin D; free vitamin D; postmenopausal; vitamin D
Year: 2021 PMID: 34783311 PMCID: PMC8679882 DOI: 10.1530/EC-21-0445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocr Connect ISSN: 2049-3614 Impact factor: 3.335
Figure 1Flowchart of the study participants.
General characteristics of the participants. Numerical data are described as mean ± s.d. with normal distribution and as median (IQR) with non-normal distribution. Descriptive data are presented as n (%). % is percentage out of the total number of subjects.
| Variables | Results ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Mean | |||
| Age (years) | 58 | 53–63 | |||
| Age at menopause (years) | 50 | 48–53 | |||
| Years since menopause | 7 | 3–14 | |||
| Weight (kg) | 75.2 | 16 | |||
| Height (cm) | 154.3 | 6.5 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.5 | 7 | |||
| Waist circumference (cm) | 90 | 84–99 | |||
| Hip circumference (cm) | 110 | 102–119 | |||
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.82 | 0.78–0.86 | |||
| Obesity classes* | |||||
| Normal (BMI: 18.5–24.9 kg/m2) | 42 (14%) | ||||
| Overweight (BMI: 25–29.9 kg/m2) | 85 (28%) | ||||
| Obese-class 1 (BMI: 30–34.9 kg/m2) | 103 (34%) | ||||
| Obese-class 2 (BMI: 35–39.9 kg/m2) | 45 (15%) | ||||
| Obese-class 3 (BMI: ≥40 kg/m2) | 27 (9%) | ||||
| Central obesity (Waist-hip ratio ≥0.8) | 187 (62%) | ||||
| Ethnicity† | |||||
| White (Arabic) | 263 (87%) | ||||
| Black (African) | 28 (9%) | ||||
| South Asian (Pakistani) | 11 (4%) | ||||
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 15 (5%) | ||||
| Married | 166 (55%) | ||||
| Divorced | 30 (10%) | ||||
| Widow | 91 (30%) | ||||
| Education | |||||
| Illiterate | 82 (27%) | ||||
| Elementary | 73 (24%) | ||||
| Intermediate | 45 (15%) | ||||
| Secondary | 54 (18%) | ||||
| University | 36 (12%) | ||||
| Postgraduate | 12 (4%) | ||||
| Occupation | |||||
| Housewife | 263 (87%) | ||||
| Governmental employed | 12 (4%) | ||||
| Privately employed | 3 (1%) | ||||
| Retired | 24 (8%) | ||||
| Physical activity | |||||
| Yes | 97 (32%) | ||||
| No | 205 (68%) | ||||
| Smoking | |||||
| Yes | 21 (7%) | ||||
| No | 281 (93%) | ||||
| Hypertensive (according to their medical records) | |||||
| Yes | 103 (34%) | ||||
| No | 199 (66%) | ||||
| Use of sunscreen | 0 (0%) | ||||
| Dietary vitamin D intake (IU/day) | 110 | 60–169 | |||
| Subjects consuming dietary vitamin D above estimated average requirement‡ | 0 (0%) | ||||
| Vitamin D status§ | |||||
| Optimal | 121 (40%) | ||||
| Insufficient | 94 (31%) | ||||
| Deficient | 87 (29%) | ||||
*Obesity classifications are based on the World Health Organization obesity definitions (36, 37). †Ethnicity was self-reported. ‡Estimated average requirement for women aged 50 years and over based on Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendation (600–800 IU/day) (30). §Vitamin D staus is classified according to 25(OH)D cut-off levels of IOM (30) (serum total 25(OH) <12 ng/mL deficiency, 12–19 ng/mL insufficiency, and 20–50 ng/mL optimal level).
Serum levels of total and free 25(OH)D in overall and as classified by ethnicity. Difference between different ethnic groups were tested by Kruskal–Wallis H test.
| Subjects | Total 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | Free 25(OH)D (pg/mL) | Percentage of free 25(OH)D out of total 25(OH)D (%)* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | Median | IQR | |
| Overall ( | 17.6 | 10.6–24.4 | 4.32 | 3.29–5.72 | 0.026 | 0.018–0.033 |
| White ( | 18 | 11.25–25.3 | 4.33 | 3.31–5.79 | 0.026 | 0.019–0.033 |
| Black ( | 11.75 | 9.27–21.65 | 4.14 | 2.83–5.45 | 0.028 | 0.021–0.038 |
| Asian ( | 17.1 | 12.3–21.6 | 4.03 | 3.62–5.27 | 0.024 | 0.017–0.032 |
| 0.131 | 0.658 | 0.588 | ||||
*Percentage of free 25(OH)D out of the total 25(OH)D was calculated by dividing free 25(OH)D levels in ng/mL over total 25(OH)D level in ng/mL then multiplied by 100.
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
Biochemical characteristics of study subjects.
| Variable | Results ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | |
| Serum intact PTH (pg/mL) | 23.7 | 14.2–42 |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 43 | 40–48 |
| Serum Ca (mmol/L) | 2.49 | 2.37–2.64 |
| Serum corrected Ca (mmol/L)* | 2.43 | 2.37–2.48 |
| Serum PO4 (mmol/L) | 1.36 | 1.24–1.51 |
| Serum magnesium (mmol/L) | 0.8 | 0.8–0.9 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.6 | 5.2–6.2 |
| Serum follicular-stimulating hormone (IU/L) | 51.9 | 39–67.8 |
| Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (mIU/L) | 2.37 | 1.39–3.7 |
| Serum free triiodothyronine (ng/dL) | 1.18 | 1.04–1.33 |
| Serum free T3 (pg/mL) | 3.72 | 3.26–4.13 |
| Serum total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.10 | 4.50–6 |
| Serum triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.27 | 0.94–1.8 |
| Serum HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.30 | 1.10–1.6 |
| Serum LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.07 | 2.62–3.8 |
| Serum VLDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.58 | 0.43–0.83 |
*Corrected Ca was calculated as serum Ca + 0.02 (40−serum albumin).
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Ca, calcium; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; PO4, phosphate; PTH, parathyroid hormone; VLDL-C, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 2The relationship (Spearman’s correlation, two-tailed) between free 25(OH)D and total 25(OH)D. (A) In all study subjects (n = 302). (B) In White subjects (n = 263). (C) in Black subjects (n = 28).
Serum total and free 25(OH)D level association with anthropometric measures, blood pressure, and bone metabolic parameters. Total and free 25(OH)D association data are presented as r (P). All correlations were obtained by two-tailed Spearman’s correlation.
| Variable | Overall ( | White ethnic group ( | Black ethnic group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total 25(OH)D | Free 25(OH)D | Total 25(OH)D | Free 25(OH)D | Total 25(OH)D | Free 25(OH)D | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.057 | −0.007 | −0.043 | −0.019 | −0.001 | 0.10 |
| (0.33) | (0.90) | (0.49) | (0.76) | (0.10) | (0.62) | |
| Waist circumference (cm) | −0.073 | 0.035 | −0.12 | 0.004 | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| (0.22) | (0.56) | (0.055) | (0.95) | (0.21) | (0.32) | |
| Hip circumference (cm) | −0.077 | 0.008 | −0.094 | −0.007 | 0.021 | 0.046 |
| (0.20) | (0.89) | (0.14) | (0.92) | (0.92) | (0.83) | |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.009 | 0.04 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.37 | 0.32 |
| (0.88) | (0.49) | (0.64) | (0.63) | (0.066) | (0.12) | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | −0.09 | −0.031 | −0.124 | −0.095 | −0.048 | −0.30 |
| (0.16) | (0.63) | (0.07) | (0.16) | (0.82) | (0.15) | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | −0.12 | −0.041 | −0.13 | −0.062 | 0.12 | −0.12 |
| (0.067) | (0.51) | (0.057) | (0.36) | (0.55) | (0.57) | |
| Serum intact PTH (pg/mL) | −0.008 | 0.047 | −0.16 | −0.02 | ||
| (−0.90) | (0.49) | (0.41) | (0.92) | |||
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 0.099 | −0.086 | −0.052 | −0.005 | 0.26 | |
| (0.091) | (0.14) | (0.41) | (0.98) | (0.20) | ||
| Serum Ca (mmol/L) | −0.006 | −0.074 | 0.035 | −0.072 | −0.069 | 0.21 |
| (0.92) | (0.20) | (0.59) | (0.25) | (0.73) | (0.29) | |
| Serum PO4 (mmol/L) | 0.078 | 0.074 | 0.17 | −0.099 | ||
| (0.18) | (0.26) | (0.39) | (0.62) | |||
| Serum magnesium (mmol/L) | −0.001 | −0.10 | 0.052 | −0.071 | −0.08 | −0.16 |
| (0.99) | (0.083) | (0.4) | (0.26) | (0.68) | (0.41) | |
*Significant correlation (P < 0.05).
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; PO4, phosphate; PTH is parathyroid hormone.
Figure 3The significant relationship (Spearman’s correlation, two-tailed) between free 25(OH)D and lipid profile in all study subjects (n = 302). (A) The relationship between free 25(OH)D and serum total cholesterol. (B) The relationship between free 25(OH)D and serum LDL-C.
Differences in serum total and free 25(OH)D concentrations as classified by skin tone, veiling, parity, and sun exposure. 25(OH)D difference between different groups were tested by Kruskal–Wallis H test. % is percentage out of the total number of subjects.
| Variables | Total 25(OH)D ng/mL | Free 25(OH)D ng/mL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | ||
| Skin tone (Fitzpatrick†) | |||||
| Type I (light, pale white) | 3 (1%) | 9.5 | 9–10 | 3.51 | 3.2–3.8 |
| Type II (white, fair) | 42 (14%) | 20.45 | 10.6–31.7 | 5.6 | 4–7.6 |
| Type III (medium white to olive) | 97 (32%) | 19.75 | 12.1–24.6 | 4.4 | 3.3–5.4 |
| Type IV (olive, mid brown) | 127 (42%) | 16.6 | 11.5–24.3 | 4.1 | 3.3–5.2 |
| Type V (brown, dark brown) | 27 (9%) | 10.95 | 9.4–19.7 | 3.7 | 2.8–5.3 |
| Type VI (very dark brown, black) | 6 (2%) | 28.4 | 15.1–30.4 | 5.5 | 5.3–7.1 |
| 0.055 | |||||
| Veiling type | |||||
| Totally covered, only eyes exposed | 236 (78%) | 17.1 | 10.4–23.8 | 4.1 | 3.2–5.5 |
| Partially covered, face exposed | 66 (22%) | 19.85 | 11.8–26.9 | 4.7 | 4.0–6 |
| 0.34 | |||||
| Parity | |||||
| No children | 27 (9%) | 16.4 | 11–22.5 | 3.6 | 2.9–4.5 |
| 1–2 children | 30 (10%) | 19 | 12.9–23.5 | 4.3 | 3.5–5.1 |
| 3–4 children | 57 (19%) | 17 | 10.7–24.9 | 4.1 | 3.3–6.7 |
| 5–6 children | 97 (32%) | 16.5 | 9.6–23.8 | 4.5 | 3.7–5.7 |
| 7+ children | 91 (30%) | 18.7 | 12–27.9 | 4.5 | 3.7–5.7 |
| 0.48 | 0.17 | ||||
| Sun exposure | |||||
| < 1 h/week | 218 (72%) | 17.7 | 10.7–24.3 | 4.3 | 3.3–5.5 |
| 1–2 h/week | 42 (14%) | 13.8 | 8.9–25.5 | 4.1 | 3.3–6.2 |
| 2–3 h/week | 15 (5%) | 13.8 | 10.2–20 | 4.7 | 3–5.5 |
| >3 h/week | 27 (9%) | 20.7 | 13.5–24.6 | 5.3 | 3.5–7.1 |
| 0.18 | 0.32 | ||||
Fitzpatrick scale (25), *significant 25(OH)D difference (P < 0.05) between the groups.
IQR, inter-quartile range.
Multiple regression analysis between serum 25(OH)D (free and total) level and independent variables.
| Dependent variables | Independent variables | β | 95% CI for β | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||
| Serum total 25(OH)D | Serum intact PTH (pg/mL) | −0.045 | −0.077 | −0.012 | |
| Serum PO4 (mmol/L) | 5.644 | 0.105 | 11.183 | ||
| Total R2 = 0.049 | |||||
| Serum free 25(OH)D | Skin tone | −0.409 | −0.719 | −0.1 | |
| Total R2 = 0.022 | |||||
95% CI: confidence intervals; β, unstandardized regression coefficient; R2, percent variance explained by each variable. Variable inclusion with P < 0.05 and exclusion with P > 0.10.
*significant P-value (P < 0.05).