Jonathan Garnier1, Jacques Ewald2, Ugo Marchese2, Anais Palen2, Djamel Mokart3, Gilles Piana4, Jean-Robert Delpero5, Olivier Turrini5. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. garnierj@ipc.unicancer.fr. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. 3. Department of Intensive Care, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. 4. Department of Interventional Radiology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology, Aix-Marseille University, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The double purse-string telescoped pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) technique has been suggested as an alternative approach to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Its efficacity in high-risk situations has not yet been explored. This study compared the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) between patients with high-risk anastomosis undergoing PG and those undergoing pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). METHODS: From 2013 to 2019, 198 consecutive patients with high-risk anastomosis, an updated alternative fistula risk score > 20%, and who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with the PJ (165) or PG (33) technique were included. Optimal mitigation strategy (external stenting/octreotide omission) was applied for all patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CR-POPF. RESULTS: The mean ua-FRS was 33%. CR-POPF (grade B/C) was found in 42 patients (21%) and postoperative hemorrhage in 30 (15%); the mortality rate was 4%. CR-POPF rates were comparable between the PJ (19%) and PG (33%) groups (P = 0.062). The PG group had a higher rate of POPF grade C (24% vs. 10%; P = 0.036), longer operative time (P = 0.019), and a higher transfusion rate (P < 0.001), even after a matching process on ua-FRS. In the multivariate analysis, the type of anastomosis (P = 0.88), body mass index (P = 0.47), or main pancreatic duct diameter (P = 0.7) did not influence CR-POPF occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with high-risk anastomosis, the double purse-string telescoped PG technique was not superior to the PJ technique for preventing CR-POPF.
PURPOSE: The double purse-string telescoped pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) technique has been suggested as an alternative approach to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Its efficacity in high-risk situations has not yet been explored. This study compared the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) between patients with high-risk anastomosis undergoing PG and those undergoing pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). METHODS: From 2013 to 2019, 198 consecutive patients with high-risk anastomosis, an updated alternative fistula risk score > 20%, and who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with the PJ (165) or PG (33) technique were included. Optimal mitigation strategy (external stenting/octreotide omission) was applied for all patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CR-POPF. RESULTS: The mean ua-FRS was 33%. CR-POPF (grade B/C) was found in 42 patients (21%) and postoperative hemorrhage in 30 (15%); the mortality rate was 4%. CR-POPF rates were comparable between the PJ (19%) and PG (33%) groups (P = 0.062). The PG group had a higher rate of POPF grade C (24% vs. 10%; P = 0.036), longer operative time (P = 0.019), and a higher transfusion rate (P < 0.001), even after a matching process on ua-FRS. In the multivariate analysis, the type of anastomosis (P = 0.88), body mass index (P = 0.47), or main pancreatic duct diameter (P = 0.7) did not influence CR-POPF occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with high-risk anastomosis, the double purse-string telescoped PG technique was not superior to the PJ technique for preventing CR-POPF.
Authors: David A Iannitti; Natalie G Coburn; Joy Somberg; Beth A Ryder; Jack Monchik; William G Cioffi Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Keith J Roberts; Robert P Sutcliffe; Ravi Marudanayagam; James Hodson; John Isaac; Paolo Muiesan; Alex Navarro; Krashna Patel; Asif Jah; Sara Napetti; Anya Adair; Stefanos Lazaridis; Andreas Prachalias; Guy Shingler; Bilal Al-Sarireh; Roland Storey; Andrew M Smith; Nehal Shah; Guiseppe Fusai; Jamil Ahmed; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Darius F Mirza Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Abhishek Mathur; Henry A Pitt; Megan Marine; Romil Saxena; C Max Schmidt; Thomas J Howard; Attila Nakeeb; Nicholas J Zyromski; Keith D Lillemoe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: George Van Buren; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Charles Vollmer; Vic Velanovich; Taylor Riall; Peter Muscarella; Jose Trevino; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Kevin Behrns; E Christopher Ellison; Omar Barakat; Kyle A Perry; Jeffrey Drebin; Michael House; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Eric J Silberfein; Steven Goldin; Kimberly Brown; Somala Mohammed; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Mehdi Issazadeh; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; William E Fisher Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Timothy H Mungroop; Sjors Klompmaker; Ulrich F Wellner; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrea Coratti; Mathieu D'Hondt; Matteo de Pastena; Safi Dokmak; Igor Khatkov; Olivier Saint-Marc; Uwe Wittel; Mohammed Abu Hilal; David Fuks; Ignasi Poves; Tobias Keck; Ugo Boggi; Marc G Besselink Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 13.787