Literature DB >> 34780283

Discontinued Use of the Loop Insulin Dosing System: A Mixed-Methods Investigation.

Jessie J Wong1, Sakinah C Suttiratana2, Rayhan A Lal1,3,4, John W Lum5, Monica S Lanning1, Adrienne Dunlap6, Brandon Arbiter7, Sarah J Hanes1, Ryan J Bailey5, Korey K Hood1,4, Diana Naranjo1,4.   

Abstract

Background: Loop is an open-source automated insulin dosing system that allows users unrivaled control over system settings that affect future glucose prediction. Thousands use Loop, but little is known about those who discontinue.
Methods: In a large observational study, 874 Loop participants completed surveys and provided glycemic data, 46 (5.3%) of those self-identified as discontinuing Loop use during the observation window, 45 completed a discontinued use survey, 22 provided system settings data, and 19 participated in semistructured interviews about their discontinuation. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed.
Results: Older age and not trusting Loop were associated with discontinued use, although no other demographic or clinical characteristics were significant correlates. The most endorsed reasons were "I decided to try something else" (27.8%) followed by "It just didn't help as much as I thought it would" (22.2%). Qualitative analyses revealed prominent themes centered upon mental and emotional burden and adjusting settings. Other reasons for discontinued use included fear of disapproval of Loop use from diabetes provider, barriers to acquiring component devices, a desire to try new/different technologies, concerns that Loop could not accommodate specific exercise or low insulin dose regimens, and worry about Loop use during pregnancy. It was noted that burdens might be alleviated by enhanced technical assistance and expert guidance. Conclusions: Although the majority of individuals in the Loop observational study continued use, those who discontinued reported similar challenges. Technical support and education specific to setting calculations could expand Loop benefits, alleviate burden, and support sustained use among new Loop users. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03838900).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automation; Diabetes mellitus; Insulin/administration and dosage; Type 1/drug therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34780283      PMCID: PMC9057870          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   7.337


  6 in total

1.  Assessing fear of hypoglycemia in children with Type 1 diabetes and their parents.

Authors:  Linda Gonder-Frederick; Maren Nyer; Jaclyn A Shepard; Karen Vajda; William Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Manag (Lond)       Date:  2011

2.  Real world hybrid closed-loop discontinuation: Predictors and perceptions of youth discontinuing the 670G system in the first 6 months.

Authors:  Laurel H Messer; Cari Berget; Tim Vigers; Laura Pyle; Cristy Geno; R Paul Wadwa; Kimberly A Driscoll; Gregory P Forlenza
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Psychometric properties of the hypoglycemia fear survey-ii for adults with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Linda A Gonder-Frederick; Karen M Schmidt; Karen A Vajda; Megan L Greear; Harsimran Singh; Jaclyn A Shepard; Daniel J Cox
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Diabetes Device Use in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Barriers to Uptake and Potential Intervention Targets.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Sarah J Hanes; Kellee M Miller; Diana Naranjo; Rachel Bensen; Korey K Hood
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  How Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Are Navigating the Challenges of Open-Source Artificial Pancreas Systems: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jasmine Schipp; Timothy Skinner; Edith Holloway; Renza Scibilia; Henriette Langstrup; Jane Speight; Christel Hendrieckx
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  A Real-World Prospective Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Loop Open Source Automated Insulin Delivery System.

Authors:  John W Lum; Ryan J Bailey; Victoria Barnes-Lomen; Diana Naranjo; Korey K Hood; Rayhan A Lal; Brandon Arbiter; Adam S Brown; Daniel J DeSalvo; Jeremy Pettus; Peter Calhoun; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 6.118

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Qualitative Study of User Experiences with Loop, an Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery System.

Authors:  Sakinah C Suttiratana; Jessie J Wong; Monica S Lanning; Adrienne Dunlap; Sarah J Hanes; Korey K Hood; Rayhan A Lal; Diana Naranjo
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.337

Review 2.  A scoping review of Do-It-Yourself Automated Insulin Delivery system (DIY AID) use in people with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Amy E Morrison; Kimberley Chong; Peter A Senior; Anna Lam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.