OBJECTIVE: It is reasonable to believe that the alcohol policy environment can impact the suicide mortality rates in a given country, considering the well-known link between alcohol use and death by suicide. The current literature, albeit limited, suggests that an increase in alcohol taxation may result in a decrease in deaths by suicide and that the effect is sex-specific. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to test the impact of three alcohol control policy enactments (in 2008, 2017 and 2018) on suicide mortality among adults 25-74 years of age in Lithuania, by sex. METHODS: To estimate the unique impact of three alcohol control policies, we conducted interrupted time-series analyses by employing a generalized additive mixed model on monthly sex-specific age-standardized suicide mortality rates from January 2001 to December 2018. RESULTS: Analyses showed a significant impact of the 2017 (p = 0.016) alcohol control policy on suicide mortality for men only. Specifically, we estimated that in the year following the 2017 policy enactment, approximately 57 (95% CI: 9-107) deaths by suicide were prevented among men, 25-74 years of age. The three policy enactments tested were not found to significantly impact the suicide mortality rate among women. CONCLUSION: Alcohol control policies involving pricing, which result in a notable decrease in alcohol affordability, could be a cost-effective indirect suicide prevention mechanism in not only countries of the former Soviet Union, but in other high-income countries with a comparable health care system to that in Lithuania. HIGHLIGHTSIncreasing excise tax on alcohol was found to have a sex-specific impact on suicide mortalityThe 2017 alcohol policy prevented 57 deaths by suicide among men, 25-74 years of age, in the following yearAlcohol pricing policies may be a cost-effective indirect suicide prevention mechanism.
OBJECTIVE: It is reasonable to believe that the alcohol policy environment can impact the suicide mortality rates in a given country, considering the well-known link between alcohol use and death by suicide. The current literature, albeit limited, suggests that an increase in alcohol taxation may result in a decrease in deaths by suicide and that the effect is sex-specific. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to test the impact of three alcohol control policy enactments (in 2008, 2017 and 2018) on suicide mortality among adults 25-74 years of age in Lithuania, by sex. METHODS: To estimate the unique impact of three alcohol control policies, we conducted interrupted time-series analyses by employing a generalized additive mixed model on monthly sex-specific age-standardized suicide mortality rates from January 2001 to December 2018. RESULTS: Analyses showed a significant impact of the 2017 (p = 0.016) alcohol control policy on suicide mortality for men only. Specifically, we estimated that in the year following the 2017 policy enactment, approximately 57 (95% CI: 9-107) deaths by suicide were prevented among men, 25-74 years of age. The three policy enactments tested were not found to significantly impact the suicide mortality rate among women. CONCLUSION: Alcohol control policies involving pricing, which result in a notable decrease in alcohol affordability, could be a cost-effective indirect suicide prevention mechanism in not only countries of the former Soviet Union, but in other high-income countries with a comparable health care system to that in Lithuania. HIGHLIGHTSIncreasing excise tax on alcohol was found to have a sex-specific impact on suicide mortalityThe 2017 alcohol policy prevented 57 deaths by suicide among men, 25-74 years of age, in the following yearAlcohol pricing policies may be a cost-effective indirect suicide prevention mechanism.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol control policy; death by suicide; suicide mortality; taxation; time-series analysis
Authors: Emma Beard; John Marsden; Jamie Brown; Ildiko Tombor; John Stapleton; Susan Michie; Robert West Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Robyn Burton; Clive Henn; Don Lavoie; Rosanna O'Connor; Clare Perkins; Kate Sweeney; Felix Greaves; Brian Ferguson; Caryl Beynon; Annalisa Belloni; Virginia Musto; John Marsden; Nick Sheron Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jakob Manthey; Kevin D Shield; Margaret Rylett; Omer S M Hasan; Charlotte Probst; Jürgen Rehm Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ziming Xuan; Timothy S Naimi; Mark S Kaplan; Courtney L Bagge; Lauren R Few; Stephen Maisto; Richard Saitz; Robert Freeman Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Kairi Kõlves; Kate M Chitty; Rachmania Wardhani; Airi Värnik; Diego de Leo; Katrina Witt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jürgen Rehm; Mindaugas Štelemėkas; Carina Ferreira-Borges; Huan Jiang; Shannon Lange; Maria Neufeld; Robin Room; Sally Casswell; Alexander Tran; Jakob Manthey Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shannon Lange; Jürgen Rehm; Alexander Tran; Courtney L Bagge; Domantas Jasilionis; Mark S Kaplan; Olga Meščeriakova-Veliulienė; Mindaugas Štelemėkas; Charlotte Probst Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 3.630