| Literature DB >> 27919442 |
Robyn Burton1, Clive Henn2, Don Lavoie3, Rosanna O'Connor3, Clare Perkins3, Kate Sweeney3, Felix Greaves4, Brian Ferguson5, Caryl Beynon3, Annalisa Belloni3, Virginia Musto3, John Marsden1, Nick Sheron6.
Abstract
This paper reviews the evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies to reduce alcohol-related harm. Policies focus on price, marketing, availability, information and education, the drinking environment, drink-driving, and brief interventions and treatment. Although there is variability in research design and measured outcomes, evidence supports the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies that address affordability and marketing. An adequate reduction in temporal availability, particularly late night on-sale availability, is effective and cost-effective. Individually-directed interventions delivered to at-risk drinkers and enforced legislative measures are also effective. Providing information and education increases awareness, but is not sufficient to produce long-lasting changes in behaviour. At best, interventions enacted in and around the drinking environment lead to small reductions in acute alcohol-related harm. Overall, there is a rich evidence base to support the decisions of policy makers in implementing the most effective and cost-effective policies to reduce alcohol-related harm.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27919442 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32420-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet ISSN: 0140-6736 Impact factor: 79.321