| Literature DB >> 34778736 |
Carley D O'Neill1, Sol Vidal-Almela1,2,3, Tasuku Terada1, Kimberley L Way1,4, Kentaro Kamiya5, Billy Sperlich6, Peter Duking6, Jean-Phillipe Chaput3,7,8, Stephanie A Prince7,9, Andrew L Pipe1,10, Jennifer L Reed1,3,7.
Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 is a global public health crisis that disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and many key CVD risk factors are modifiable (e.g., physical inactivity, sedentary behaviour, obesity). To limit the spread of coronavirus 2019, most governments have implemented restrictions and recommended staying at home, reducing social contact to a select and exclusive few, and limiting large gatherings. Such public health constraints may have unintended, negative health consequences on 24-hour movement behaviours. The primary purpose of this review is to provide practical at-home recommendations for sedentary time, sleep, and physical activity in those living with CVD. Adults with CVD will benefit from practical recommendations to reduce sedentary time, increase purposeful exercise, and maintain optimal sleep patterns while being at home and adhering to public health restrictions. Our recommendations include the following: (i) self-monitoring sitting time; (ii) engaging in 2-3 days per week of purposeful exercise for those with low exercise capacity and > 3 days per week for those with moderate-to-high exercise capacity; (iii) self-monitoring exercise intensity through the use of scales or wearable devices; (iv) maintaining a regular sleep schedule; and (v) moving daily. Clinicians should be aware that clear communication of the importance of limiting prolonged sedentary time, engaging in regular physical activity and exercise, and ensuring optimal sleep in association with the provision of clear, comprehensible, and practical advice is fundamental to ensuring that those living with CVD respond optimally to the challenges posed by the pandemic.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34778736 PMCID: PMC8573736 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.08.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CJC Open ISSN: 2589-790X
Figure 1The interconnectedness of the 24-hour movement behaviours and exercise amid the pandemic is shown. PA, physical activity; RPE, Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion.
24-hour movement behaviour recommendations
| Sedentary behaviour | Physical activity | Sleep | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendations | ≤ 8 h/d, including ≤ 3 h recreational screen time Breaking up long periods of sitting as often as possible | 150 min moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week Muscle- strengthening activities using major muscle groups at least twice a week Several hours of light physical activities, including standing | 7-9 h optimal sleep per night, with consistent bed and wake-up times |
Symptoms to self-monitor during exercise
| Symptoms | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Dizziness or lightheadedness | Reduce intensity; hydrate with water or a sports drink; sit or lie down |
| Excessive shortness of breath | Reduce intensity; remain calm |
| Nausea | Reduce intensity; cool down |
| Chest pain | Reduce intensity; remain calm; call or have a family member/friend call 911 |
Prescribing and monitoring exercise intensity among patients with stable cardiovascular disease in an unsupervised setting
| Tool | Exercise intensity level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Moderate | Vigorous | |
| Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion | 9–11 | 12–13 | 14–17 |
| Gellish equation, % heart rate peak | < 57–63 | 64–75 | 76–95 |
| Talk test | Able to sing | Unable to sing but can maintain conversation | Conversation is not possible |
Heart rate prediction equations for monitoring exercise intensity
| Equation | Population/method used to develop equation | Number of men/women in study | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gellish et al. | Middle-aged participants with a good level of fitness (n = 132) | 100/32 | No sex differences | Not validated among patients with CVD |
| Fox et al. | Men, age < 65 years | Men only | Easy to use | Overestimates heart rate peak among older adults age ± 40 years |
| Tanaka et al. | Meta-analysis (n = 18,712 healthy adults) along with a prospective study (514 healthy adults) | Not reported | Can predict heart rate peak among older adults regardless of sex | Not validated among patients with CVD |
| Karvonen et al. | Males, age 20 to 23 years (n = 6) | 6/0 | Helped establish exercise training intensities: | Can over- or underestimate exercise intensity in certain patients |
CVD, cardiovascular disease; HRR, heart rate reserve.