Literature DB >> 34077542

Exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation and beyond: why and how: a position statement from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology.

Dominique Hansen1,2, Ana Abreu3, Marco Ambrosetti4, Veronique Cornelissen5, Andreas Gevaert6,7, Hareld Kemps8,9,10, Jari A Laukkanen11,12, Roberto Pedretti13, Maria Simonenko14, Matthias Wilhelm15, Constantinos H Davos16, Wolfram Doehner17,18, Marie-Christine Iliou19, Nicolle Kränkel18,20, Heinz Völler21,22, Massimo Piepoli22.   

Abstract

A proper determination of the exercise intensity is important for the rehabilitation of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) since it affects the effectiveness and medical safety of exercise training. In 2013, the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), together with the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, published a position statement on aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR). Since this publication, many subsequent papers were published concerning the determination of the exercise intensity in CR, in which some controversies were revealed and some of the commonly applied concepts were further refined. Moreover, how to determine the exercise intensity during resistance training was not covered in this position paper. In light of these new findings, an update on how to determine the exercise intensity for patients with CVD is mandatory, both for aerobic and resistance exercises. In this EAPC position paper, it will be explained in detail which objective and subjective methods for CR exercise intensity determination exist for aerobic and resistance training, together with their (dis)advantages and practical applications.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic training; Exercise intensity; Resistance training;  Cardiovascular rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34077542     DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  13 in total

1.  Efficacy, efficiency and safety of a cardiac telerehabilitation programme using wearable sensors in patients with coronary heart disease: the TELEWEAR-CR study protocol.

Authors:  Varsamo Antoniou; Andrew Xanthopoulos; Gregory Giamouzis; Constantinos Davos; Ladislav Batalik; Vasileios Stavrou; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis; Eleni Kapreli; John Skoularigis; Garyfallia Pepera
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Aerobic, Strength and Flexibility Exercise Training Program in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Squeo; Barbara Di Giacinto; Marco Alfonso Perrone; Massimo Santini; Maria Luisa Sette; Emanuele Fabrizi; Antonia Vaquer; Attilio Parisi; Antonio Spataro; Alessandro Biffi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Beneficial Role of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Heart Disease and Heart Failure Using the Muscle Hypothesis of Chronic Heart Failure and a Growing Literature.

Authors:  Lawrence P Cahalin; Magno F Formiga; Johnny Owens; Brady Anderson; Luke Hughes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Optimizing Outcomes in Cardiac Rehabilitation: The Importance of Exercise Intensity.

Authors:  Jenna L Taylor; Amanda R Bonikowske; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-09-03

Review 5.  Exercise Dose Equalization in High-Intensity Interval Training: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Tom Normand-Gravier; Florian Britto; Thierry Launay; Andrew Renfree; Jean-François Toussaint; François-Denis Desgorces
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Current role and future perspectives of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Eduardo M Vilela; Ricardo Ladeiras-Lopes; Ana Joao; Joana Braga; Susana Torres; Sofia Viamonte; José Ribeiro; Madalena Teixeira; José P Nunes; Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-26

Review 7.  Moving Together While Staying Apart: Practical Recommendations for 24-Hour Home-Based Movement Behaviours for Those With Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Carley D O'Neill; Sol Vidal-Almela; Tasuku Terada; Kimberley L Way; Kentaro Kamiya; Billy Sperlich; Peter Duking; Jean-Phillipe Chaput; Stephanie A Prince; Andrew L Pipe; Jennifer L Reed
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-08-28

8.  Exercise training for cardiovascular patients: Push me across the threshold!

Authors:  Marco Ambrosetti; Dominique Hansen
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev       Date:  2022-05-18

9.  High-Load and Low-Load Resistance Exercise in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Feasibility and Safety of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Tim Kambic; Nejc Šarabon; Vedran Hadžić; Mitja Lainscak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Benefits of a Balance Exercise Assist Robot in the Cardiac Rehabilitation of Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Kakeru Hashimoto; Akihiro Hirashiki; Kenichi Ozaki; Koki Kawamura; Junpei Sugioka; Shunya Tanioku; Kenji Sato; Ikue Ueda; Naoki Itoh; Kenichiro Nomoto; Manabu Kokubo; Atsuya Shimizu; Izumi Kondo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.