Sergio W Guadix1, Alice J Tao1, Anjile An2, Michelle Demetres3, Umberto Tosi4, Swathi Chidambaram4, Jonathan P S Knisely5, Rohan Ramakrishna4, Susan C Pannullo4. 1. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. 2. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 3. Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in long-term outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems for vestibular schwannoma (VS) management remain unclear. To investigate differences in safety and efficacy between modalities, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies over the past decade. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for studies with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between January 2010 and April 2020, cohort size ≥30, and mean/median follow-up ≥5 years. Odds ratios (OR) compared rates of tumor control, hearing preservation, and cranial nerve toxicities before and after SRS. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were included (29 GK, 10 LINAC) with 6516 total patients. Tumor control rates were 93% (95% CI 91-94%) and 94% (95% CI 91-97%) for GK and LINAC, respectively. Both GK (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.13) and LINAC (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.76) reduced odds of serviceable hearing. Neither GK (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.22) nor LINAC (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64-2.00) impacted facial nerve function. GK decreased odds of trigeminal nerve (TN) impairment (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) while LINAC did not impact TN function (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.61). Lastly, LINAC offered decreased odds of tinnitus (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.87) not observed with GK (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: VS tumor control and hearing preservation rates are comparable between GK and LINAC SRS. GK may better preserve TN function, while LINAC decreases tinnitus rates. Future studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of GK and LINAC SRS more directly.
BACKGROUND: Differences in long-term outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems for vestibular schwannoma (VS) management remain unclear. To investigate differences in safety and efficacy between modalities, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies over the past decade. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for studies with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between January 2010 and April 2020, cohort size ≥30, and mean/median follow-up ≥5 years. Odds ratios (OR) compared rates of tumor control, hearing preservation, and cranial nerve toxicities before and after SRS. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were included (29 GK, 10 LINAC) with 6516 total patients. Tumor control rates were 93% (95% CI 91-94%) and 94% (95% CI 91-97%) for GK and LINAC, respectively. Both GK (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.13) and LINAC (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.76) reduced odds of serviceable hearing. Neither GK (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.22) nor LINAC (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64-2.00) impacted facial nerve function. GK decreased odds of trigeminal nerve (TN) impairment (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) while LINAC did not impact TN function (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.61). Lastly, LINAC offered decreased odds of tinnitus (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.87) not observed with GK (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: VS tumor control and hearing preservation rates are comparable between GK and LINAC SRS. GK may better preserve TN function, while LINAC decreases tinnitus rates. Future studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of GK and LINAC SRS more directly.
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Hossein Mahboubi; Ronald Sahyouni; Omid Moshtaghi; Kent Tadokoro; Yaser Ghavami; Kasra Ziai; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Katherine A Lees; Nicole M Tombers; Michael J Link; Colin L Driscoll; Brian A Neff; Jamie J Van Gompel; John I Lane; Christine M Lohse; Matthew L Carlson Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Bassel Bashjawish; Suat Kılıç; Soly Baredes; Jean Anderson Eloy; James K Liu; Yu-Lan Mary Ying Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Umberto Tosi; Sergio Guadix; Anjile An; Drew Wright; Paul J Christos; Susan Pannullo; Andrew Brandmaier; Jonathan P S Knisely; Philip E Stieg; Rohan Ramakrishna Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2021-02-01