Literature DB >> 34777707

Self-reported and clinically evident gingival bleeding and impact on oral health-related quality of life in young adolescents: a comparative study.

Folake B Lawal1,2,3, Elizabeth B Dosumu1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Very little is known about how self-reported gingival bleeding affects the oral health-related quality of life in adolescents compared with clinically evident bleeding. This study aimed to compare the impact of self-reported gingival bleeding and clinically evident gingival bleeding on the oral health-related quality of life in young adolescents.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 976 students (aged 10-14 years) in randomly selected primary schools in Ibadan. Data were obtained by oral examination and completion of the Child Oral Impact on Daily Performance Questionnaire. Data were analysed with SPSS version 24. The Mann Whitney U test was used to determine the association between gingival bleeding and the quality of life.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 11.4±1.3 years. Almost half (48.3%) of the participants reported gingival bleeding during tooth cleaning while the gingiva of 534 (54.7%) participants bled on examination. Pupils with self-reported bleeding suffered a significantly greater impact on their overall quality of life than those without self-reported bleeding (mean ranks: 528.1 vs. 451.6, P<0.001). For pupils with self-reported bleeding, there were higher impacts on all domains relating to quality of life than those who did not report bleeding (eating: mean ranks=521.0 vs. 458.2; speaking: 502.2 vs. 475.8; teeth cleaning: 522.7 vs. 456.7; sleeping: 497.7 vs. 456.7; showing teeth/smiling: 503.4 vs. 474.6; emotional stability: 501.1 vs. 476.8; school work: 492.4 vs. 484.9, and enjoying contact with other children: 494.0 vs. 483.4). There was no statistically significant association between clinically evident bleeding and impacts on the quality of life (P=0.272).
Conclusion: Almost half of the students reported gingival bleeding while cleaning their teeth and over 50% experienced gingival bleeding on probing. Those with self-reporting of gingival bleeding had greater impacts on oral health-related quality of life compared with those with clinically evident bleeding.
© 2021 The College of Medicine and the Medical Association of Malawi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; gingivitis; oral health; periodontal diseases; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34777707      PMCID: PMC8560349          DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v33i2.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malawi Med J        ISSN: 1995-7262            Impact factor:   0.875


Introduction

Gingival bleeding is one of the earliest signs of gingival inflammation, a common condition among adolescents. Gingival inflammation is often considered a major symptom and clinical indicator of periodontal disease1. In its commonest form, this condition is associated with dental plaque and may be due to a wide array of systemic factors1. Plaque-induced bleeding from the gingiva is a public health concern because of the high global prevalence of periodontal diseases2. The prevalence of gingival bleeding among adolescents varies across the world and has been found to range from 37.4% to 99.0% in different populations3–7. In Nigeria, the prevalence of this condition in adolescents in an urban setting was reported to be 54.3%8. Clinically evident gingival bleeding (CGB) affects the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in adolescents6. However, it remains uncertain if this is the case among adolescents in Nigeria. This becomes important in view of the high prevalence of this condition among adolescents and the fact that this particular population exhibit poor oral health-seeking behavior8, 9. Although this is an obvious pointer for the need to promote oral health among adolescents in the country, there is, however, a paucity of information relating to the burden of this condition with regards to initiating a suitable planning process for interventions to address this public health problem. Understanding the perception of adolescents on how gingival bleeding, as reported by specific individuals, affects their daily activities is vital if we are to plan such programs. Furthermore, the self-perception of a condition and the impact of the condition on the quality of life are important epidemiological measures in describing the burden of a condition for health interventions10. In addition, gingival bleeding is often perceived as a feature of tooth cleaning by adolescents in low income countries such as Nigeria11. This is an additional indicator for the need to promote oral health; this is critical at the stage of adolescence as this practice can prevent periodontal diseases in later years12. Moreover, very little is known about how self-reported gingival bleeding (SRGB) affects the OHRQoL of adolescents compared with CGB. This study therefore compared the impact of SRGB and CGB on the OHRQoL in young adolescents in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted among adolescents in the fifth and sixth grades of randomly selected public primary schools in Ibadan, Nigeria. Ibadan is the capital city of Oyo State, Southwestern Nigeria and is the largest city in sub-Saharan Africa. The city is stratified into metropolitan areas, which are more developed, and non-metropolitan regions. A sample size of 895 was obtained for the study, calculated using a sample size formula for cross-sectional studies13 at a prevalence rate of 54.3% for CGB8 and a 3.5% degree of error. A non-response rate of 20% was added to the calculated sample size in order to accommodate for non-responders or withdrawal from the study at any stage. This resulted in a total of 973 students as the minimum sample size for the study. The study participants were recruited from 19 public primary schools that were selected using a systematic sampling technique from a list featuring 338 schools within the metropolis of Ibadan. A proportionate sample of 20–30 students was selected from each of the grade five and six classes in each school using a table of random numbers. The study aimed to address an early adolescence group aged between 10 and 14 years14. This age group was selected to address young adolescents who were still in the process of establishing autonomy in the psychosocial development stage15. In addition, adolescents in this age group are at a stage when they are beginning to shape their own behaviour, thus making them targets for oral health promotion; such strategies will last into late adolescence and adulthood14,15, particularly as the prevalence of periodontal disease increases with age. This age group is more likely seen in grades five and six in public schools of our country, hence we decided to focus on these particular grades. Permission to carry out the study was obtained from the State Ministry of Education and the State Universal Education Board before visiting each school. Ethical approval was obtained from the State Ethics Review Board (Reference: AD 13/479/649). Permission was obtained from the head teacher in each school and the purpose of the study was explained to both the head teacher and class teachers. This was followed by the selection of students from the two classes (grades five and six). The selected students were gathered together in a classroom or school hall and the purpose of the study was explained to them. We answered any questions that the students put forward. Each student was given a consent form written in both English and Yoruba languages to take home to obtain consent from their parents. The informed consent form was translated to ensure that all parents, irrespective of their educational qualifications, were informed of the purpose of the research and the processes involved. The study recruited only students that returned signed consent forms; those who did not give consent or were ill at the time that data were collected were excluded from the study. Data were obtained with a questionnaire and an oral examination; these were administered by an interviewer and a dentist, respectively. The questionnaire was translated into the local language by two independent researchers versed in both English and Yoruba languages. The Yoruba version of the questionnaire was translated back into English language by another independent scholar versed in English and Yoruba languages. The translated questionnaire was pre-tested among 50 pupils in a school that was not included in the study. The pretest was used to investigate the ease of administering the questionnaire and the comprehensibility of the questions by the students. The questionnaire comprised 13 questions under three sections. Section A assessed biodata for each participant, including age at last birthday, sex, father's occupation, and mother's occupation. The occupation was classified into skilled, unskilled, and dependent, according to a modification of the Office of Population Census and Survey16. We recorded the higher occupational class of either the father or the mother, as appropriate. In addition, SRGB was assessed by a single item question: “Does your gum bleed while brushing”; the responses were “Yes” (to include always, often and sometimes), or “No”. Section C assessed the OHRQoL of the participants using the Child Oral Impact on Daily Performances (C-OIDP) index. The C-OIDP has been validated and used previously in Nigeria17,18. This questionnaire features eight questions and a 3-point Likert scale for frequency and severity response scales. The eight daily performances that were assessed included difficulty in eating and enjoying food, speaking and pronouncing words, teeth cleaning, sleeping and relaxing, emotional stability, smiling/showing teeth, studying, and social contacts, during the three months preceding the study. The response scale consisted of a frequency scale and a severity scale from 0 (never) to 3. Each performance score was calculated by multiplying the frequency score by the severity score and a total score was generated by the summation of the eight performance scores; the performance score ranged from 0 to 72. Oral examination was conducted by two trained and calibrated dentists with the help of trained research assistants who recorded the oral examination findings into the assessment forms. Inter-examiner variability was assessed by the random examination of 50 students during the study; the inter-examiner variability was 0.9. Oral examination was conducted in a classroom with students seated upright on a chair with natural lighting serving as the source of illumination. A Sterile World Health Organization Community Periodontal Index probe and a dental mirror were used for all oral examinations. To ensure privacy, we examined one student at a time. A teacher was present as a guardian during the oral examination. Gingival bleeding was determined using the gingival index19. During gentle probing of the four surface areas of the index teeth19, the gingival index was charted as 0, absence of inflammation; 1, mild gingivitis (no bleeding, slight change in colour and little change in texture of the gingiva); 2, moderate gingivitis (bleeding on probing, moderate glazing, redness, edema, and hypertrophy); and 3, severe gingivitis (tendency for spontaneous bleeding, marked redness and hypertrophy)19. Gingival bleeding was recorded as being present if the participant had a gingival index score of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe). We also recorded the presence or absence of orthodontic appliances. Data were analysed with SPSS version 23 (IBM). Inter-examiner variability was assessed by Kappa statistics. The internal consistency of the C-OIDP was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Categorical data were summarized by frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were summarized by means and standard deviation. The Shapiro Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of the C-OIDP scores20. The association between participant biodata and gingival bleeding was conducted using the χ-square test and bivariate analysis. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis for variables that were proven to be statistically significant by bivariate analysis; unadjusted and adjusted odd ratios are presented. The Mann Whitney U test was used to evaluate the association between C-OIDP scores and gingival bleeding. The level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

A total of 976 students participated in this study. The age of the participants ranged from 10 to 14 years with a mean age of 11.4±1.3 years; 45.6% were females. The parents of 92.8% of the participants were in the unskilled occupational class (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the participants

VariableFrequency%
Sex
Male53154.4
Female44545.6
Age (years)
10–1156858.2
12–1440841.8
Parent's occupational class
Skilled444.5
Unskilled90692.8
Dependent262.7
Self-reported gingival bleeding
Present47148.3
Absent50551.7
Clinically evident gingival bleeding
Present53454.7
Absent44245.2
Characteristics of the participants Almost half of the participants (48.3%) reported gingival bleeding during tooth cleaning and 54.7% of participants experienced gingival bleeding on clinical examination. None of the participants had an orthodontic appliance. Cronbach's alpha for the C-OIDP measure was 0.91. The C-OIDP score ranged from 0 to 63 with a median of 0.0 and a mean score of 2.5±7.5. Normality tests of data showed that C-OIDP scores were not normally distributed (Shapiro Wilk statistic=0.385, P<0.001). The mean C-OIDP score was 4.0±9.6 among those with SRGB compared with 1.1±4.2 for those without SRGB. The mean C-OIDP scores were 2.3±7.2 and 2.7±7.8 for those with and without gingival bleeding on probing, respectively. The was no difference between the participants distributions with respect to sociodemographic groups and SRGB (Table 2). On the other hand, differences existed in relation to sex, age, the occupational class of the parents, and CGB (Table 2). Participants aged 12–14 years were more likely to be clinically diagnosed with gingival bleeding than those aged 10–11 years (odds ratio [OR]=1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.1–1.8, P=0.013).
Table 2

Self-reported gingival bleeding, clinically evident gingival bleeding, and sociodemographic characteristics

Self-reported gingival bleedingClinically evident gingival bleeding


VariablesPresent n (%)Absent n (%)χ2P valuePresent n (%)Absent n (%)χ2P value
Sex
Male253 (47.6)278 (52.4)0.1750.676313 (58.9)218 (41.1)8.4190.004*
Female216 (49.0)227 (51.0)221 (49.7)224 (50.3)
Age (years)
10–11227 (48.8)291 (51.2)0.1410.707290 (51.1)278 (48.9)7.3330.007*
12–14194 (47.5)214 (52.5)244 (59.8)164 (40.2)
Occupational class
Skilled17 (38.6)27 (61.4)3.4710.17617 (38.6)27 (61.4)6.8500.033*
Unskilled438 (48.3)468 (51.7)499 (55.1)407 (44.9)
Dependent16 (61.5)10 (38.5)18 (69.2)8 (30.8)

Statistically significant (P<0.05).

Self-reported gingival bleeding, clinically evident gingival bleeding, and sociodemographic characteristics Statistically significant (P<0.05). Male participants were also more likely to have CGB than females, the OR was only slightly reduced (OR=1.4; 95% CI=1.1–1.8; P=0.007) after adjusting for other demographic factors (Table 3). Participants whose parents were skilled workers were less likely to have CGB than others (OR=0.3; 95% CI=0.1–0.8; P=0.015); this did not change after adjustment for other demographic variables (Table 3).
Table 3

Logistic regression of the association between clinically evident gingival bleeding and participant biodata

VariableCategoryUnadjustedAdjusted
ORCIP valueORCIP value
Age (years)12–141.41.1–1.80.007*1.41.1–1.80.013*
10–11
SexMale1.51.1–1.90.004*1.41.1–1.80.007*
Female
Parent occupational ClassSkilled0.30.1–0.80.015*0.30.1–0.80.017*
Unskilled0.50.2–1.30.1580.60.2–1.40.280
Dependents
Logistic regression of the association between clinically evident gingival bleeding and participant biodata Participants who had SRGB had higher mean ranks of statistically significant impacts on the overall OHRQoL compared with those who did not report gingival bleeding (528.1 vs. 451.6, P<0.001) (Table 4). Similarly, those who had SRGB had more statistically significant impacts for all of the domains of the C-OIDP (eating, speaking, teeth cleaning, showing teeth/smiling, emotional stability, sleeping, school work, and enjoying contact with other children) than others (Table 4). Tooth cleaning and eating were the daily activities that were most frequently affected by gingival bleeding (Table 4).
Table 4

Impact of self-reported gingival bleeding and clinically evident gingival bleeding on oral health-related quality of life

Self-reported gingival bleedingClinically evident gingival bleeding


C-OIDP itemMean rankUZP valueMean rankUZP value
Eating
Present521.0103603.0-5.649<0.001*484.1115672.5-0.8660.386
Absent458.2493.8
Speaking
Present502.2112487.5-3.572<0.001*485.1116191.0-1.0150.310
Absent475.75492.6
Cleaning teeth
Present522.7102836.0-6.194<0.001*482.1114619.5-1.3120.190
Absent456.7496.2
Sleeping
Present497.7114595.0-2.7390.006*486.7117043.0-0.6160.538
Absent456.7490.7
Smiling
Present503.4111903.5-4.065<0.001*484.0115615.0-1.3940.163
Absent474.6493.9
Emotional stability
Present501.1113000.5-4.301<0.001*484.8116057.5-1.4250.154
Absent476.8492.9
School work
Present492.4117106.5-2.0840.037*486.6116991.5-1.1750.240
Absent484.9490.8
Social contact
Present494.0116338.0-2.675<0.001*485.1116190.0-1.8920.059
Absent483.4492.6
Total OIDP score
Present528.1100290.5-6.207<0.001*482.4114730.0-1.0980.272
Absent451.6495.9

CGB, clinically evident gingival bleeding; C-OIDP, child oral impact on daily performances; OIDP, oral impact on daily performances; SRGB, self-reported gingival bleeding.

Statistically significant (P<0.05).

Impact of self-reported gingival bleeding and clinically evident gingival bleeding on oral health-related quality of life CGB, clinically evident gingival bleeding; C-OIDP, child oral impact on daily performances; OIDP, oral impact on daily performances; SRGB, self-reported gingival bleeding. Statistically significant (P<0.05). Participants with CGB had lower but non-significant impacts on their quality of life than those without CGB (mean ranks: 482.4 vs. 492.6, P=0.272). There were no statistically significant associations between CGB and any of the domains of the C-OIDP (Table 4).

Discussion

The study assessed SRGB and CGB and their relative impact on OHRQoL in young adolescents in Ibadan, Nigeria. Our results showed that over 50% of the participants had CGB; these findings were similar to those reported previously for Nigeria8. However, higher proportions than that observed in this study have been reported among 12-year-olds in Brazil4, and among adolescents in Laos3, Thailand6, and Greece5. On the other hand, a lower proportion (25.9%) was previously reported among adolescents in Georgia21. Disease distribution, coupled with an awareness of oral health, may explain the different prevalence rates reported in these earlier studies. Less than 50% of the participants reported gingival bleeding while brushing. Males were more likely to have CGB. This is similar to the findings reported by other studies5,7,22,23. The more positive attitude of females to health, generally, compared with males may have contributed to this finding. A higher proportion of older participants had CGB compared with younger participants. This finding was corroborated by the fact that the prevalence of periodontal diseases increases with age12,22. Furthermore, participants whose parents belonged to lower occupational classes were also more likely to have CGB. Socioeconomic class, with its dominant effect on oral health, has been extensively discussed5,10. The poorer oral health of adolescents and individuals from lower social classes could arise from suboptimal oral practices and malnutrition, in addition to inaccessibility to dental care services. CGB was not associated with the OHRQoL of adolescents in this study. In addition, CGB had lower impacts on participants OHRQoL. Our findings are in contrast to other reports among Thai adolescents aged 12 and 15 years where gingivitis caused greater impacts on OHRQoL6. Furthermore, a higher odds of impaired OHRQoL was noted among children with CGB compared with those without gingival bleeding, as reported by other authors24–26. However, a previous study also published findings that were similar to those reported herein27. The differences across these studies may be attributed to the perception of the participants involved in these studies. Another contributor may be the chronicity of the condition, which exists without pain except in acute cases. The role of pain and oral diseases on OHRQoL has been previously documented17. Incongruous with our findings related to CGB among young adolescents, SRGB was associated with greater impacts on the overall quality of life. In addition, participants with SRGB had higher impacts on OHRQoL which affected all of the C-OIDP domains. The impact of SRGB on OHRQoL has been documented in a previous study28. However, none of the previous studies documented how daily activities could be influenced by SRGB. Tooth cleaning and eating were the daily activities that were most frequently reported to be affected by SRGB. The inflammation associated with such bleeding may be responsible for the effect on tooth cleaning and eating. Similarly, the sight of blood may also be associated with fear, which could further hinder adequate tooth cleaning, thus leading to poorer levels of oral hygiene. Maintaining social contact or performing school work were the activities that were least affected by gingival bleeding. These data showed that gingival bleeding has less impact on such activities. Social activities may not be as impaired as other activities unless they are associated with dental appearance; this factor is considered to be important among adolescents and many individuals. This study had limitations that need to be considered when interpreting our findings. First, this study featured a cross-sectional design; as such, cause-effect relationships should be interpreted with caution. However, the study has provided information relating to SRGB and CGB to further describe the burden of gingival bleeding on the OHRQoL of adolescents. Secondly, the study participants were adolescents from public secondary schools; this makes it difficult to generalize our findings to private schools. This was, however, the intention of the study due to the high prevalence of gingival bleeding among adolescents from low socioeconomic classes; these are predominantly seen in public schools. Findings from this study could be further enhanced by using quantitative methods to analyse the perception of adolescents with regards to gingival bleeding and other symptoms of plaque-related periodontal diseases.

Conclusion

Almost half of the students investigated reported gingival bleeding while cleaning their teeth and over 50% experienced gingival bleeding on probing. The self-reporting of gingival bleeding resulted in greater impacts on OHRQoL compared with clinically evident bleeding.
  20 in total

1.  PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. I. PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY.

Authors:  H LOE; J SILNESS
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life among Sudanese schoolchildren using Child-OIDP inventory.

Authors:  Nazik M Nurelhuda; Mutaz F Ahmed; Tordis A Trovik; Anne N Åstrøm
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 3.  Adolescent psychosocial, social, and cognitive development.

Authors:  Renata Arrington Sanders
Journal:  Pediatr Rev       Date:  2013-08

Review 4.  Periodontal disease in children and adolescents of Latin America.

Authors:  Javier E Botero; Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing; Andres Duque; Adriana Jaramillo; Adolfo Contreras
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.589

5.  The associations of socioeconomic status and social capital with gingival bleeding among schoolchildren.

Authors:  Fernanda Tomazoni; Mario Vianna Vettore; Fabricio Batistin Zanatta; Simone Tuchtenhagen; Carlos Heitor Cunha Moreira; Thiago Machado Ardenghi
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 1.821

6.  The influence of oral health conditions, socioeconomic status and home environment factors on schoolchildren's self-perception of quality of life.

Authors:  Janice S Paula; Isabel Cg Leite; Anderso B Almeida; Glaucia Mb Ambrosano; Antônio C Pereira; Fábio L Mialhe
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Validity and reliability of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires applied in Brazilian children.

Authors:  Taís S Barbosa; Maria Claudia M Tureli; Maria Beatriz D Gavião
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Oral health and the impact of socio-behavioural factors in a cross sectional survey of 12-year old school children in Laos.

Authors:  Nanna Jürgensen; Poul Erik Petersen
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.

Authors:  Asghar Ghasemi; Saleh Zahediasl
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-04-20

10.  Periodontal status among adolescents in Georgia. A pathfinder study.

Authors:  Liran Levin; Vladimer Margvelashvili; Leon Bilder; Manana Kalandadze; Nino Tsintsadze; Eli E Machtei
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.