Literature DB >> 34776698

Piezotome Versus Surgical Bur: Which is More Effective in Reducing the Postoperative Pain and Edema Following Open Sinus Lift Surgery?

Reza Shahakbari1, Ali Labafchi1, Saba Salami1, Sahand Samieirad1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the piezotome versus surgical bur on postoperative edema and pain following open sinus lift surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double-blinded split mouth randomized clinical trial. The subjects who were candidates for bilateral open sinus lifting in the posterior maxilla were included in this experiment. Each maxillary side was assigned randomly to one group, piezosurgery or surgical diamond bur for sinus lifting. Postoperative pain and edema were evaluated on the second and seventh days after the surgery, using the VAS scale. Data were analyzed by SPSS software.
RESULTS: In this study, 20 subjects including 10 females (50%) and 10 males (50%) with a mean age of 50.87 ± 9.04 years participated. The mean duration of surgery in piezosurgery (240.13 ± 49.5 s) was significantly higher than the surgical bur technique (135.07 ± 43.53 s) (P < 0.001). Pain and edema were significantly decreased on the seventh day postoperatively compared to the second day in both group (P < 0.05). Pain and edema were similar between the two study groups on the second and seventh days after surgery.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study depicted that the piezosurgery clinical outcomes were similar to surgical bur following open sinus lift surgery. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Edema; Open sinus lift; Pain; Piezosurgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 34776698      PMCID: PMC8555008          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-020-01391-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  22 in total

Review 1.  Sinus lift procedures: an overview of current techniques.

Authors:  Avichai Stern; James Green
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2012-01

Review 2.  Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  G Pavlíková; R Foltán; M Horká; T Hanzelka; H Borunská; J Sedý
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Pasqualini; N Cocero; A Castella; L Mela; P Bracco
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 4.  Maxillary sinus lift surgery-with or without graft material? A systematic review.

Authors:  L deF Silva; V N de Lima; L P Faverani; M R de Mendonça; R Okamoto; E P Pellizzer
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 5.  Piezosurgery applied to implant dentistry: clinical and biological aspects.

Authors:  Cassiano Costa Silva Pereira; Walter Cristiano Gealh; Lamis Meorin-Nogueira; Idelmo Rangel Garcia-Júnior; Roberta Okamoto
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 6.  Piezolelectric surgery in dentistry: a review.

Authors:  F Carini; V Saggese; G Porcaro; M Baldoni
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

7.  Critical evaluation of piezoelectric osteotomy in orthognathic surgery: operative technique, blood loss, time requirement, nerve and vessel integrity.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Stefan Stübinger; Jörg Rieger; Babett Williger; Thi Khanh Linh Ha; Robert Sader
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Hydrodynamic ultrasonic maxillary sinus lift: review of a new technique and presentation of a clinical case.

Authors:  R Velázquez-Cayón; M-M Romero-Ruiz; D Torres-Lagares; B Pérez-Dorao; M Wainwright; C Abalos-Labruzzi; J-L Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 9.  Open Sinus Lift Surgery and the Importance of Preoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan: A Review.

Authors:  Amin Rahpeyma; Saeedeh Khajehahmadi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-09

Review 10.  Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Qian Jiang; Yating Qiu; Chi Yang; Jingyun Yang; Minjie Chen; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of a Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Index for Evaluating Surgical Sites Prior to Sinus Lift Procedures-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shishir Ram Shetty; Satyavrat Arya; Vinayak Kamath; Saad Al-Bayatti; Hesham Marei; Hossam Abdelmagyd; Mohamed El-Kishawi; Saaid Al Shehadat; Sausan Al Kawas; Raghavendra Shetty
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.