Literature DB >> 21176870

Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

G Pavlíková1, R Foltán, M Horká, T Hanzelka, H Borunská, J Sedý.   

Abstract

This review summarizes current knowledge and experience with piezosurgery, a promising, meticulous and soft tissue-sparing system for bone cutting, based on ultrasonic microvibrations. The main advantages of piezosurgery include soft tissue protection, optimal visibility in the surgical field, decreased blood loss, less vibration and noise, increased comfort for the patient and protection of tooth structure. To date it has been indicationed for use in oral and maxillofacial surgery, otorhinolaryngology, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, traumatology and orthopaedics. The main indications in oral surgery are sinus lift, bone graft harvesting, osteogenic distraction, ridge expansion, endodontic surgery, periodontal surgery, inferior alveolar nerve decompression, cyst removal, dental extraction and impacted tooth removal. In conclusion, piezosurgery is a promising technical modality for different aspects of bone surgery with a rapidly increasing number of indications throughout the whole field of surgery.
Copyright © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21176870     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  37 in total

1.  Reduced somatosensory impairment by piezosurgery during orthognathic surgery of the mandible.

Authors:  Phillipp Brockmeyer; Wolfram Hahn; Stefan Fenge; Norman Moser; Henning Schliephake; Rudolf Matthias Gruber
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

Review 2.  Role of ultrasonography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of literature.

Authors:  Kodali Rama Mohan; Nadella Koteswara Rao; Guttikonda Leela Krishna; Vedati Santosh Kumar; Nallamothu Ranganath; Uppaluru Vijaya Lakshmi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-03-14

3.  Bone Micromorphology and Material Attrition After Sonic, Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ashkan Rashad; Stefan Schwan; Alireza Nasirpour; Inge Schmitz; Henning Hanken; Reinhard E Friedrich; Martin Gosau
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Bone microRNA-21 as surgical stress parameter is associated with third molar postoperative discomfort.

Authors:  Milan Vucetic; Jelena Roganovic; Martin Freilich; David Shafer; Marija Milic; Ljiljana DJukic; Nina Petrovic; Evgenija Markovic; Aleksa Markovic; Bozidar Brkovic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Custom-made, selective laser sintering (SLS) blade implants as a non-conventional solution for the prosthetic rehabilitation of extremely atrophied posterior mandible.

Authors:  F Mangano; M Bazzoli; L Tettamanti; D Farronato; M Maineri; A Macchi; C Mangano
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  [Advantages of piezoelectric technology in rhinoplasty].

Authors:  M San Nicoló; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Combined Approach to Treat Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws.

Authors:  Elisabetta Merigo; Luigi Cella; Aldo Oppici; Maria Cristina Arbasi; Fabio Clini; Matteo Fontana; Carlo Fornaini
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

8.  Direct Sinus Lift and Immediate Implant Placement Using Piezosurgical Approach- A Case Report.

Authors:  Sahana Purushotham; Arjun Machingal Raveendran; Bekal Kavitha Kripalani; Melba Lisa D'Souza
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

9.  Characterisation of bone following ultrasonic cutting.

Authors:  Sunil Claire; Simon C Lea; A Damien Walmsley
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  [Comparison of piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty : A systematic review].

Authors:  M Wähmann; F Riedel; M Kovacevic; A Hopf; A E Albers
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.