Literature DB >> 34776025

Development and evaluation of a diet quality screener to assess adherence to the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines.

Mariëlle G de Rijk1, Anne I Slotegraaf1, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma1, Corine W M Perenboom1, Edith J M Feskens1, Jeanne H M de Vries1.   

Abstract

The Eetscore FFQ was developed to score the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 (DHD2015-index) representing the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines of 2015. This paper describes the development of the Eetscore FFQ, a short screener assessing diet quality, examines associations between diet quality and participants' characteristics, and evaluates the relative validity and reproducibility of the Eetscore FFQ in a cross-sectional study with Dutch adults. The study sample consisted of 751 participants, aged 19-91 years, recruited from the EetMeetWeet research panel. The mean DHD2015-index score based on the Eetscore FFQ of the total sample was 111 (sd 17·5) out of a maximum score of 160 points and was significantly higher in women than in men, positively associated with age and education level, and inversely associated with BMI. The Kendall's tau-b coefficient of the DHD2015-index between the Eetscore FFQ and the full-length FFQ (on average 1·7-month interval, n 565) was 0·51 (95 % CI 0·47, 0·55), indicating an acceptable ranking ability. The intraclass correlation coefficient between DHD2015-index scores derived from two repeated Eetscore FFQ (on average 3·8-month interval, n 343) was 0·91 (95 % CI 0·89, 0·93) suggesting a very good reproducibility. In conclusion, the Eetscore FFQ was considered acceptable in ranking participants according to their diet quality compared with the full-length FFQ and showed good to excellent reproducibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DHD15-index; Diet quality; Dutch dietary guidelines; Reproducibility; Screener

Year:  2021        PMID: 34776025      PMCID: PMC9557209          DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521004499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   4.125


  47 in total

Review 1.  Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review.

Authors:  P K Newby; Katherine L Tucker
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 2.  Diet quality--what is it and does it matter?

Authors:  Annika Wirt; Clare E Collins
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Combining traditional dietary assessment methods with novel metabolomics techniques: present efforts by the Food Biomarker Alliance.

Authors:  Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma; Lorraine Brennan; Christian A Drevon; Henk van Kranen; Claudine Manach; Lars Ove Dragsted; Helen M Roche; Cristina Andres-Lacueva; Stephan J L Bakker; Jildau Bouwman; Francesco Capozzi; Sarah De Saeger; Thomas E Gundersen; Marjukka Kolehmainen; Sabine E Kulling; Rikard Landberg; Jakob Linseisen; Fulvio Mattivi; Ronald P Mensink; Cristina Scaccini; Thomas Skurk; Inge Tetens; Guy Vergeres; David S Wishart; Augustin Scalbert; Edith J M Feskens
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.297

5.  Diet quality of Americans differs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, and education level.

Authors:  Hazel A B Hiza; Kellie O Casavale; Patricia M Guenther; Carole A Davis
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Self-reported energy intake by FFQ compared with actual energy intake to maintain body weight in 516 adults.

Authors:  Els Siebelink; Anouk Geelen; Jeanne H M de Vries
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Relative validity and reproducibility of dietary quality scores from a short diet screener in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

Authors:  Clare Whitton; Jolene Chien Yee Ho; Salome A Rebello; Rob M van Dam
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Does a better adherence to dietary guidelines reduce mortality risk and environmental impact in the Dutch sub-cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition?

Authors:  Sander Biesbroek; W M Monique Verschuren; Jolanda M A Boer; Mirjam E van de Kamp; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Anouk Geelen; Moniek Looman; Elisabeth H M Temme
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Validation of the English Version of the 14-Item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener of the PREDIMED Study, in People at High Cardiovascular Risk in the UK.

Authors:  Angeliki Papadaki; Laura Johnson; Zoi Toumpakari; Clare England; Manmita Rai; Stu Toms; Chris Penfold; Itziar Zazpe; Miguel A Martínez-González; Gene Feder
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  The 2015 Dutch food-based dietary guidelines.

Authors:  D Kromhout; C J K Spaaij; J de Goede; R M Weggemans
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence to estimate wine volume from single-view images.

Authors:  Miriam Cobo; Ignacio Heredia; Fernando Aguilar; Lara Lloret Iglesias; Daniel García; Begoña Bartolomé; M Victoria Moreno-Arribas; Silvia Yuste; Patricia Pérez-Matute; Maria-Jose Motilva
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-06

2.  DIetary ASSessment (DIASS) Study: Design of an Evaluation Study to Assess Validity, Usability and Perceived Burden of an Innovative Dietary Assessment Methodology.

Authors:  Desiree A Lucassen; Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma; Anne I Slotegraaf; Esther Kok; Edith J M Feskens
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.