V Paul Poteat1, Jessica N Fish2, Ryan J Watson3. 1. Boston College, Department of Counseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology, Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Campion Hall 307, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA. Electronic address: PoteatP@bc.edu. 2. University of Maryland, College Park, Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, 1142 Valley Drive, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Electronic address: jnfish@umd.edu. 3. University of Connecticut, Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, 348 Mansfield Road, U-1058, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. Electronic address: ryan.j.watson@uconn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Victimization and depression are major stressors underlying drinking behavior among LGBTQ+ youth. There remains limited attention to setting-level factors that buffer their effects. Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) are school clubs that could promote the health of LGBTQ+ youth. We consider whether their presence in schools moderates associations between victimization, depressive symptoms, and recent alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking. METHODS: LGBTQ+ youth (n = 5776) ages 13-17 in all 50 U.S. states with any prior history of alcohol use reported past 30-day alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking, victimization, depressive symptoms, and covariates including recent mental health counseling, perceived school safety, and demographics. Logistic regression models predicted youth's likelihood of any recent drinking and any heavy episodic drinking, with attention to GSA × victimization and GSA × depressive symptoms interaction effects. FINDINGS: GSA presence moderated the extent to which victimization and depressive symptoms were associated with greater odds of recent heavy episodic drinking. GSA presence did not moderate these associations for lower thresholds of drinking (i.e., any drinking). CONCLUSION: For LGBTQ+ youth with any lifetime history of alcohol use, GSAs could protect against heavy alcohol use, particularly when they face victimization and depression. GSAs may provide them with social-emotional support or educate school health professionals on ways to support LGBTQ+ youth facing victimization or mental health concerns. GSAs may not protect against all drinking behavior because youth may view some levels as normative. Our findings begin to suggest for whom GSA presence could be most protective.
BACKGROUND: Victimization and depression are major stressors underlying drinking behavior among LGBTQ+ youth. There remains limited attention to setting-level factors that buffer their effects. Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) are school clubs that could promote the health of LGBTQ+ youth. We consider whether their presence in schools moderates associations between victimization, depressive symptoms, and recent alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking. METHODS: LGBTQ+ youth (n = 5776) ages 13-17 in all 50 U.S. states with any prior history of alcohol use reported past 30-day alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking, victimization, depressive symptoms, and covariates including recent mental health counseling, perceived school safety, and demographics. Logistic regression models predicted youth's likelihood of any recent drinking and any heavy episodic drinking, with attention to GSA × victimization and GSA × depressive symptoms interaction effects. FINDINGS: GSA presence moderated the extent to which victimization and depressive symptoms were associated with greater odds of recent heavy episodic drinking. GSA presence did not moderate these associations for lower thresholds of drinking (i.e., any drinking). CONCLUSION: For LGBTQ+ youth with any lifetime history of alcohol use, GSAs could protect against heavy alcohol use, particularly when they face victimization and depression. GSAs may provide them with social-emotional support or educate school health professionals on ways to support LGBTQ+ youth facing victimization or mental health concerns. GSAs may not protect against all drinking behavior because youth may view some levels as normative. Our findings begin to suggest for whom GSA presence could be most protective.
Authors: V Paul Poteat; Jerel P Calzo; Hirokazu Yoshikawa; Arthur Lipkin; Christopher J Ceccolini; Sarah B Rosenbach; Michael D O'Brien; Robert A Marx; Gabriel R Murchison; Esther Burson Journal: Child Dev Date: 2019-11-25
Authors: Louise Carton; Baptiste Pignon; Alexandre Baguet; Imane Benradia; Jean-Luc Roelandt; Guillaume Vaiva; Pierre Thomas; Ali Amad; Philippe De Timary; Mickaël Naassila; Pierre A Geoffroy; Benjamin Rolland Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sandra A Brown; Matthew McGue; Jennifer Maggs; John Schulenberg; Ralph Hingson; Scott Swartzwelder; Christopher Martin; Tammy Chung; Susan F Tapert; Kenneth Sher; Ken C Winters; Cherry Lowman; Stacia Murphy Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jack K Day; Jessica N Fish; Amaya Perez-Brumer; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Stephen T Russell Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: John E Schulenberg; Megan E Patrick; Deborah D Kloska; Julie Maslowsky; Jennifer L Maggs; Patrick M O'Malley Journal: Subst Abuse Date: 2016-05-25
Authors: Michelle M Johns; Richard Lowry; Jack Andrzejewski; Lisa C Barrios; Zewditu Demissie; Timothy McManus; Catherine N Rasberry; Leah Robin; J Michael Underwood Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 17.586