Literature DB >> 34774419

Impact of Operator Volumes and Experience on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.

Christopher P Kovach1, Colin I O'Donnell2, Stanley Swat1, Jacob A Doll3, Mary E Plomondon2, Richard Schofield4, Javier A Valle5, Stephen W Waldo6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent analyses of the volume-outcome relationship for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have suggested a less robust association than previously reported. It is unknown if novel factors such as lifetime operator experience influence this relationship.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between annual volumes and outcomes for PCI and determine whether lifetime operator experience modulates the association.
METHODS: Annual PCI volumes for facilities and operators within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System and their relationship with 30-day mortality following PCI were described. The influence of operator lifetime experience on the volume-outcome relationship was assessed. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to adjust for patient and procedural factors.
RESULTS: 57,608 PCIs performed from 2013 to 2018 by 382 operators and 63 institutions were analyzed. Operator annualized PCI volume averaged 47.6 (standard deviation [SD] 49.1) and site annualized volume averaged 189.2 (SD 105.2). Median operator experience was 9.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-15.0). There was no independent relationship between operator annual volume, institutional volume, or operator lifetime experience with 30-day mortality (p > 0.10). However, the interaction between operator volume and lifetime experience was associated with a marginal decrease in mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.9998, 95% CI 0.9996-0.9999).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant associations between facility or operator-level procedural volume and 30-day mortality following PCI in a nationally integrated healthcare system. There was a marginal association between the interaction of operator lifetime experience, operator annual volume, and 30-day mortality that is unlikely to be clinically relevant, though does suggest an opportunity to explore novel factors that may influence the volume-outcome relationship. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experience; Mortality; Outcomes; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Quality; Volume

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34774419      PMCID: PMC9072598          DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med        ISSN: 1878-0938


  43 in total

1.  PCI Volume Benchmarks: Still Adequate for Quality Assessment in 2017?

Authors:  Dharam J Kumbhani; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  SCAI/ACC/AHA Expert Consensus Document: 2014 Update on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup.

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer; James C Blankenship; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; James G Dwyer; Dmitriy N Feldman; Timothy J Gardner; Cindy L Grines; Mandeep Singh
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Relation Between Operator and Hospital Volumes and Long-Term Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York.

Authors:  Feng Qian; Ye Zhong; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Total Center Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume and 30-Day Mortality: A Contemporary National Cohort Study of 427 467 Elective, Urgent, and Emergency Cases.

Authors:  Darragh O'Neill; Owen Nicholas; Chris P Gale; Peter Ludman; Mark A de Belder; Adam Timmis; Keith A A Fox; Iain A Simpson; Simon Redwood; Simon G Ray
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-03

Review 5.  The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Piet N Post; Michiel Kuijpers; Tjark Ebels; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Comparative Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017.

Authors:  Taku Inohara; Shun Kohsaka; John A Spertus; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; Kevin F Kennedy; Tracy Y Wang; Kyohei Yamaji; Tetsuya Amano; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Operator Volumes and In-Hospital Outcomes: An Analysis of 7,740 Rotational Atherectomy Procedures From the BCIS National Database.

Authors:  Tim Kinnaird; Sean Gallagher; Andrew Sharp; Majd Protty; Tariq Salim; Peter Ludman; Samuel Copt; Nick Curzen; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Yulanka S Castro-Dominguez; Yongfei Wang; Karl E Minges; Robert L McNamara; John A Spertus; Gregory J Dehmer; John C Messenger; Kimberly Lavin; Cornelia Anderson; Kristina Blankinship; Nestor Mercado; Julie M Clary; Anwar D Osborne; Jeptha P Curtis; Matthew A Cavender
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Who Would You Want to Do Your Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

Authors:  Marwan Saad; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease-Report From the National Clinical Data (J-PCI Registry).

Authors:  Tadao Aikawa; Kyohei Yamaji; Toshiyuki Nagai; Shun Kohsaka; Kiwamu Kamiya; Kazunori Omote; Taku Inohara; Yohei Numasawa; Kenichi Tsujita; Tetsuya Amano; Yuji Ikari; Toshihisa Anzai
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.