Literature DB >> 28320707

Total Center Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume and 30-Day Mortality: A Contemporary National Cohort Study of 427 467 Elective, Urgent, and Emergency Cases.

Darragh O'Neill1, Owen Nicholas2, Chris P Gale2, Peter Ludman2, Mark A de Belder2, Adam Timmis2, Keith A A Fox2, Iain A Simpson2, Simon Redwood2, Simon G Ray2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between procedural volume and prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with some studies finding in favor of an inverse association and some against. This UK study provides a contemporary reassessment in one of the few countries in the world with a nationally representative PCI registry. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A nationwide cohort study was performed using the national British Cardiovascular Intervention Society registry. All adult patients undergoing PCI in 93 English and Welsh NHS hospitals between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed using hierarchical modeling with adjustment for patient risk. Of 427 467 procedures (22.0% primary PCI) in 93 hospitals, 30-day mortality was 1.9% (4.8% primary PCI). 87.1% of centers undertook between 200 and 2000 procedures annually. Case mix varied with center volume. In centers with 200 to 399 PCI cases per year, a smaller proportion were PCI for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (8.4%) than in centers with 1500 to 1999 PCI cases per year (24.2%), but proportionally more were for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (8.4% versus 4.3%). For the overall PCI cohort, after risk adjustment, there was no significant evidence of worse, or better, outcomes in lower volume centers from our own study, or in combination with results from other studies. For primary PCI, there was also no evidence for increased or decreased mortality in lower volume centers.
CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for differences in case mix and clinical presentation, this study supports the conclusion of no trend for increased mortality in lower volume centers for PCI in the UK healthcare system. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02184949.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angioplasty; cardiology; mortality; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28320707     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  8 in total

1.  Role of Hospital Volumes in Identifying Low-Performing and High-Performing Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgical Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Ambarish Pandey; Thomas Koshy; Colby Ayers; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Sandeep R Das; Mark H Drazner; Michael E Jessen; Ajay J Kirtane; Timothy J Gardner; James A de Lemos; Deepak L Bhatt; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Impact of Operator Volumes and Experience on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.

Authors:  Christopher P Kovach; Colin I O'Donnell; Stanley Swat; Jacob A Doll; Mary E Plomondon; Richard Schofield; Javier A Valle; Stephen W Waldo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2021-11-06

3.  Current Practices of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Korea between 2011 and 2015.

Authors:  Han Saem Jeong; Soon Jun Hong
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Kerala, India: Report of the Cardiological Society of India-Kerala Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.

Authors:  Abdullakutty Jabir; Anoop Mathew; Yinggan Zheng; Cynthia Westerhout; Sunitha Viswanathan; Placid Sebastian; Prasanna Kumar; Sripal Bangalore; Kevin R Bainey; Robert Welsh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  The relationship between procedural volume and patient outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Harrington; Máirín Ryan; Kieran A Walsh; Thomas Plunkett; Kirsty K O'Brien; Conor Teljeur; Susan M Smith
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-01-28

6.  Volume-Outcome Relationships for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yuichi Saito; Kazuya Tateishi; Masato Kanda; Yuki Shiko; Yohei Kawasaki; Yoshio Kobayashi; Takahiro Inoue
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Association between operator volume and mortality in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Arvindra Krishnamurthy; Claire M Keeble; Michelle Anderson; Natalie Burton-Wood; Kathryn Somers; Charlotte Harland; Paul D Baxter; Jim M McLenachan; Jonathan M Blaxill; Daniel J Blackman; Christopher J Malkin; Stephen B Wheatcroft; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-10

8.  Risk prediction in multicentre studies when there is confounding by cluster or informative cluster size.

Authors:  Menelaos Pavlou; Gareth Ambler; Rumana Z Omar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.