| Literature DB >> 34774409 |
Mohd Naushad1, Mohd Urooj2, Tasleem Ahmad2, Gulam Mohammed Husain2, Munawwar Husain Kazmi1, Mohammad Zakir3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is extensively used in treating cancers, and its primary side-effect is nephrotoxicity. It accumulates in proximal convoluted tubules where it promotes cellular damage by oxidative stress, apoptosis, and inflammation, etc. In Unani medicine, Tukhm-e-Karafs(Apium graveolens L.) (TK) is mentioned in the literature to manage various kidney ailments due to its diuretic and deobstruent activities.Entities:
Keywords: Cisplatin; KIM-1; Nephroprotective; Nephrotoxicity; Tukhm-e-Karafs; Unani
Year: 2021 PMID: 34774409 PMCID: PMC8642661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2021.06.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Fig. 1Relative organ weight of controls and TK treated animals.
Fig. 2Relative organ weight of controls and TK treated animals.
Cisplatin curative protocol.
| Parameter | Vehicle | Cisplatin | TK | TK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.61 ± 0.03 | 1.08 ± 0.11∗ | 0.81 ± 0.14 | 0.66 ± 0.04≠ |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 14.68 ± 0.79 | 53.38 ± 3.80∗ | 45.45 ± 15.99 | 15.60 ± 1.56≠ |
| Uric Acid (mg/dL) | 1.98 ± 0.13 | 2.05 ± 0.07 | 1.43 ± 0.11∗∗≠≠ | 1.567 ± 0.08∗≠ |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 143.3 ± 1.56 | 145.7 ± 1.11 | 146.5 ± 0.76 | 148.5 ± 0.92∗ |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 6.10 ± 0.32 | 6.30 ± 0.23 | 4.91 ± 0.17∗∗≠≠ | 4.51 ± 0.07∗∗∗≠≠≠ |
| Chloride (mmol/L) | 95.33 ± 0.61 | 95.50 ± 0.88 | 92.33 ± 0.66 | 94.50 ± 1.05 |
| Calcium (mmol/L) | 2.41 ± 0.01 | 2.45 ± 0.03 | 2.61 ± 0.01∗∗∗≠≠ | 2.56 ± 0.042∗∗ |
| Total Protein (g/dL) | 6.75 ± 0.07 | 6.50 ± 0.20 | 6.783 ± 0.23 | 6.80 ± 0.08 |
Values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 06; One-way ANOVA; ∗ = p < 0.05 vs control ∗∗ = p < 0.01 vs control, ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001 vs control ≠=p < 0.05 vs Cisplatin control ≠≠=p < 0.01 vs Cisplatin control, ≠≠≠=p < 0.001 vs Cisplatin control.
Cisplatin protective protocol.
| Parameter | Vehicle | Cisplatin | TK | TK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 1.183 ± 0.16∗ | 0.81 ± 0.01≠ | 0.80 ± 0.0≠ |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 14.02 ± 0.6452 | 23.02 ± 1.644∗∗ | 20.12 ± 2.53 | 15.17 ± 0.716≠ |
| Uric Acid (mg/dL) | 1.75 ± 0.10 | 1.76 ± 0.12 | 1.35 ± 0.06∗≠ | 1.48 ± 0.06 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 120.7 ± 0.84 | 118.7 ± 1.11 | 116.0 ± 1.29 | 119.0 ± 1.50 |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 13.82 ± 0.46 | 15.02 ± 0.44 | 15.55 ± 0.30 | 15.67 ± 0.75 |
| Chloride (mmol/L) | 106.7 ± 0.33 | 108.2 ± 0.47 | 108.3 ± 0.55 | 108.2 ± 0.47 |
| Calcium (mmol/L) | 1.73 ± 0.02 | 1.73 ± 0.02 | 1.85 ± 0.02 | 1.917 ± 0.122 |
| Total Protein (g/dL) | 7.08 ± 0.03 | 6.91 ± 0.18 | 7.06 ± 0.03 | 6.93 ± 0.05 |
Values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 06; One-way ANOVA; ∗ = p < 0.05 vs. control ∗∗ = p < 0.01 vs. control, ≠ = p < 0.05 vs. Cisplatin control.
Fig. 3KIM-1 level of Controls and TK treated animals. Values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 06; One-way ANOVA; ∗ = p < 0.05 vs control.
Fig. 4KIM-1 level of Controls and TK treated animals. Values presented as mean ± SEM; n = 06; One-way ANOVA; ∗∗ = p < 0.01 vs control, ∗∗∗ = p < 0.001 vs control.
Fig. 5Representative photomicrograph (40X) of kidney in the curative protocol; (A) normal control (B) Cisplatin control showing infiltration of mononuclear cells (C) TK low dose treated (D) TK high dose treated.
Fig. 6Representative photomicrograph (40X) of kidney in the protective protocol; (A) normal control (B) Cisplatin control showing haemorrhage, tubular dilation and vacuolization (C) TK low dose treated (D) TK high dose treated.