Literature DB >> 34773484

Opportunistic Use of Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Osteoporosis Screening.

A Kadri1, N Binkley2, D Hernando3, P A Anderson4.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a routine assessment before spine surgery. We found that the opportunistic use of MRI with the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score has good diagnostic ability, with a threshold value of VBQ > 3.0, in recognizing patients who may need further osteoporosis evaluation.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the opportunistic use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for identifying spine surgical patients who need further osteoporosis evaluation.
METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 83 thoracolumbar spine surgery patients age ≥ 50 who received T1-weighted MRI. Opportunistic MRI was evaluated with the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, VBQ (fat) score, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Each uses the median L1-L4 vertebral body signal intensities (SI) divided by either the L3 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) SI, average SI of the L1 and S1 dorsal fat, or standard deviation (SD) of the background SI dorsal to the skin. Single-level VBQ was calculated as the ratio of the L1 vertebral body and L1 CSF SIs. Receiver-operator curve analysis was performed to determine diagnostic ability.
RESULTS: The mean age was 70.10, 80% were female, and 96% were Caucasian. The mean ± SD VBQ, single-level VBQ, VBQ (fat), and SNR were 3.39 ± 0.68, 3.56 ± 0.81, 3.95 ± 1.89, and 113.18 ± 77.26, respectively. Using area under the curve, the diagnostic ability of VBQ, single-level VBQ, VBQ (fat), and SNR for clinical osteoporosis were 0.806, 0.779, 0.608, and 0.586, respectively. Diagnostic threshold values identified with optimal sensitivity and specificity were VBQ of 2.95 and single-level VBQ of 3.06.
CONCLUSION: Opportunistic use of MRI is a simple, effective tool that may help recognize patients who are at risk for complications related to bone disease. A VBQ > 3.0 can identify patients who need additional diagnostic evaluation.
© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone health optimization; Magnetic resonance imaging; Orthopedic surgery; Osteoporosis; Spine surgery; Vertebral bone quality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34773484     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06129-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

Review 1.  Automatic estimation of the noise variance from the histogram of a magnetic resonance image.

Authors:  Jan Sijbers; Dirk Poot; Arnold J den Dekker; Wouter Pintjens
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A new diagnostic score to detect osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Giovanni Di Leo; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Carmelo Messina; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management.

Authors:  Joseph J Schreiber; Paul A Anderson; Humberto G Rosas; Avery L Buchholz; Anthony G Au
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Novel MRI-based score for assessment of bone density in operative spine patients.

Authors:  Jeff Ehresman; Zach Pennington; Andrew Schilling; Daniel Lubelski; A Karim Ahmed; Ethan Cottrill; Majid Khan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Local bone quality affects the outcome of prosthetic total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chuan-Ching Huang; Ching-Chuan Jiang; Chang-Hsun Hsieh; Chia-Jung Tsai; Hongsen Chiang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Proton-density fat fraction and simultaneous R2* estimation as an MRI tool for assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Diego Hernando; Peter J Meffert; Scott Reeder; Norbert Hosten; Rene Laqua; Antje Steveling; Stephan Ender; Henry Schröder; Dirk-Thomas Pillich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Osteoporosis and orthopedic surgery: effect of bone health on total joint arthroplasty outcome.

Authors:  Linda A Russell
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  A brief history of FRAX.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  MRI-measured pelvic bone marrow adipose tissue is inversely related to DXA-measured bone mineral in younger and older adults.

Authors:  W Shen; J Chen; M Gantz; M Punyanitya; S B Heymsfield; D Gallagher; J Albu; E Engelson; D Kotler; X Pi-Sunyer; V Gilsanz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Cosman; S J de Beur; M S LeBoff; E M Lewiecki; B Tanner; S Randall; R Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.